[#48729] [ANN] ruby 2.0.0-preview1 released — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
Japanese later; 日本語はあとで
Hi,
Hello Vit,
2012/11/6 Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp>
[#48745] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7267][Open] Dir.glob on Mac OS X returns unexpected string encodings for unicode file names — "kennygrant (Kenny Grant)" <kennygrant@...>
[#48773] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7269][Open] Refinement doesn't work if using locate after method — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
(2012/11/03 10:11), headius (Charles Nutter) wrote:
(2012/11/03 10:36), SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#48774] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods — "shugo (Shugo Maeda)" <redmine@...>
[#48819] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
[#48820] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7271][Assigned] Refinement doesn't seem lexical — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
[#48847] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7274][Open] UnboundMethods should be bindable to any object that is_a?(owner of the UnboundMethod) — "rits (First Last)" <redmine@...>
[#48882] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
[#48964] [Backport93 - Backport #7285][Assigned] some failures on RubyInstaller CI — "usa (Usaku NAKAMURA)" <usa@...>
[#48988] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7292][Open] Enumerable#to_h — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>
[#48997] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7297][Open] map_to alias for each_with_object — "nathan.f77 (Nathan Broadbent)" <nathan.f77@...>
[#49018] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7299][Open] Ruby should not completely ignore blocks. — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>
[#49078] Re: [ruby-cvs:44714] marcandre:r37544 (ruby_1_9_3): merge revisions r33453, r37542: — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
Hello,
[#49119] ID_ALLOCATOR ? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello.
Can I see ruby-prof code?
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:14 AM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#49196] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7322][Open] Add a new operator name #>< for bit-wise "exclusive or" — "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>
[#49211] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7328][Open] Move ** operator precedence under unary + and - — "boris_stitnicky (Boris Stitnicky)" <boris@...>
[#49256] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7336][Open] Flexiable OPerator Precedence — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>
[#49267] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7340][Open] 'each_with' or 'into' alias for 'each_with_object' — "nathan.f77 (Nathan Broadbent)" <nathan.f77@...>
[#49268] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7341][Open] Enumerable#associate — "nathan.f77 (Nathan Broadbent)" <nathan.f77@...>
[#49282] Re: [ruby-cvs:44801] tenderlove:r37631 (trunk): * probes.d: add DTrace probe declarations. — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
Hello,
Hello,
2012/11/13 U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp>:
[#49298] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7346][Open] object(...) as syntax sugar for object.call(...) — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
[#49320] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
[#49328] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7349][Open] Struct#inspect needs more meaningful output — "postmodern (Hal Brodigan)" <postmodern.mod3@...>
[#49340] bugs.ruby-lang.org - 500 error — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
I've been unable to access it since morning EET (about 6 hours now).
It's almost 3am in Japan now, don't forget.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Zachary Scott <zachary@zacharyscott.net> w=
[#49354] review open pull requests on github — Zachary Scott <zachary@...>
Could we get a review on any open pull requests on github before the
2012/11/15 Zachary Scott <zachary@zacharyscott.net>:
Ok, I was hoping one of the maintainers might want to.
I could add my eyes to monitor the github issues/pull requests, if only to
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Marc-Andre Lafortune
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Zachary Scott <zachary@zacharyscott.net>
[#49370] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7358][Open] Wrong fd redirection on fork — "felipec (Felipe Contreras)" <felipe.contreras@...>
[#49416] make check: missing psych — Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...>
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
Luis Lavena wrote:
[#49463] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7375][Open] embedding libyaml in psych for Ruby 2.0 — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 03:05:50AM +0900, vo.x (Vit Ondruch) wrote:
Dne 17.11.2012 21:19, Aaron Patterson napsal(a):
On 17 November 2012 21:34, V=EDt Ondruch <v.ondruch@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
[#49468] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7378][Open] Adding Pathname#write — "aef (Alexander E. Fischer)" <aef@...>
[#49479] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7379][Open] Unexpected result of Kernel#gets on Windows 8 — "phasis68 (Heesob Park)" <phasis@...>
[#49518] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7383][Open] Use stricter cache check in load.c — "funny_falcon (Yura Sokolov)" <funny.falcon@...>
[#49536] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7388][Open] Object#embed — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <zachary@...>
[#49543] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7390][Open] Funny Falcon Threads — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <zachary@...>
[#49558] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7395][Open] Negative numbers can't be primes by definition — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <zachary@...>
[#49868] How to stop spam from ruby-core — Heesob Park <phasis@...>
Hi,
[#49949] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7426][Assigned] Update Rdoc — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...>
(2012/11/27 13:33), drbrain (Eric Hodel) wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:57 AM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On Nov 26, 2012, at 10:09 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#50092] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7434][Open] Allow caller_locations and backtrace_locations to receive negative params — "sam.saffron (Sam Saffron)" <sam.saffron@...>
[#50264] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7457][Open] GC.stat to return "allocated object count" and "freed object count" — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
[#50306] Towards a better process for changing Ruby — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
Hey folks,
What I'd like to see is primarily better communication and release
Hello Magnus,
Endoh-san,
[#50312] How to stop spam message from redmine.ruby-lang.org — Heesob Park <phasis@...>
HI,
Hi,
[#50372] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7476][Open] missing "IP_TRANSPARENT" constant for IP sockets. — "elico (Eliezer Croitoru)" <eliezer@...>
2013/2/24 ko1 (Koichi Sasada) <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
[ruby-core:50406] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods
> Since there still remain undefined corner case behavior in refinements, and the time is running out, I decided not to introduce full refinement for Ruby 2.0. The limited Ruby 2.0 refinement spec will be: > > * refinements are file scope > * only top-level "using" is available > * no module scope refinement > * no refinement inheritance > * module_eval do not introduce refinement (even for string args) While this removes a number of potential causes of problems we're now stuck with a feature-set that can not cover many of the originally discussed use-cases. And to support the restricted feature set we already have disagreements where refinements should be injected in the method hierarchy. What is labled as a "design decision" aren't even edge cases anymore. They're essential behavior of a new feature decided without much discussion or analysis in the context of potential uses. For DSLs we already have BasicObject + method_missing + instance_eval, so only ruby literals may need some sugar added to make the DSL really fluent. But if you already have all the instance_eval magic going then you don't really want to require people to pepper their code with "using" just so they can use your magical DSL. For patching broken/incompatible code Module.prepend is much better anyway since the breakage may occur in 3rd party code where you can't use "using" anyway. So with what does this leave us? String.camelize and 2.days.ago? Those are supposed to be convenience methods. If your files end up with a header of using "EnumeratorExtensions", "ActiveSupport::ClassNameConversions", "MyApplication::DateHelpers", "SomeGem::HashExtensions", "MyApplication::ActiveRecordExtensions", ....... That's not convenient at all anymore. Personally I wouldn't want to use refinements as they are now. I would love to have a powerful tool like pointcuts or Module.prepend in my toolbox. Refinements wouldn't really qualify. I'm getting the impression that refinements are getting rushed despite being supposed to bring a completely new axis to the language along which we can compose our applications. This shouldn't be happening in a mature language. The whole way this is going right now feels wrong to me. So I'm asking for two things: a) please consider removing refinements from ruby 2.0. b) rethink how such big features should be designed in the future.