[#48745] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7267][Open] Dir.glob on Mac OS X returns unexpected string encodings for unicode file names — "kennygrant (Kenny Grant)" <kennygrant@...>

17 messages 2012/11/02

[#48773] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7269][Open] Refinement doesn't work if using locate after method — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>

12 messages 2012/11/03

[#48847] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7274][Open] UnboundMethods should be bindable to any object that is_a?(owner of the UnboundMethod) — "rits (First Last)" <redmine@...>

21 messages 2012/11/04

[#48854] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7276][Open] TestFile#test_utime failure — "jonforums (Jon Forums)" <redmine@...>

14 messages 2012/11/04

[#48988] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7292][Open] Enumerable#to_h — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>

40 messages 2012/11/06

[#48997] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7297][Open] map_to alias for each_with_object — "nathan.f77 (Nathan Broadbent)" <nathan.f77@...>

19 messages 2012/11/06

[#49001] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7298][Open] Behavior of Enumerator.new different between 1.9.3 and 2.0.0 — "ayumin (Ayumu AIZAWA)" <ayumu.aizawa@...>

12 messages 2012/11/06

[#49018] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7299][Open] Ruby should not completely ignore blocks. — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>

13 messages 2012/11/07

[#49044] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7304][Open] Random test failures around test_autoclose_true_closed_by_finalizer — "luislavena (Luis Lavena)" <luislavena@...>

11 messages 2012/11/07

[#49196] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7322][Open] Add a new operator name #>< for bit-wise "exclusive or" — "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>

18 messages 2012/11/10

[#49211] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7328][Open] Move ** operator precedence under unary + and - — "boris_stitnicky (Boris Stitnicky)" <boris@...>

20 messages 2012/11/11

[#49229] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7331][Open] Set the precedence of unary `-` equal to the precedence `-`, same for `+` — "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>

17 messages 2012/11/11

[#49256] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7336][Open] Flexiable OPerator Precedence — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>

18 messages 2012/11/12

[#49354] review open pull requests on github — Zachary Scott <zachary@...>

Could we get a review on any open pull requests on github before the

12 messages 2012/11/15
[#49355] Re: review open pull requests on github — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2012/11/15

2012/11/15 Zachary Scott <zachary@zacharyscott.net>:

[#49356] Re: review open pull requests on github — Zachary Scott <zachary@...> 2012/11/15

Ok, I was hoping one of the maintainers might want to.

[#49451] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7374][Open] File.expand_path resolving to first file/dir instead of absolute path — mdube@... (Martin Dubé) <mdube@...>

12 messages 2012/11/16

[#49463] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7375][Open] embedding libyaml in psych for Ruby 2.0 — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>

21 messages 2012/11/16
[#49494] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7375] embedding libyaml in psych for Ruby 2.0 — "vo.x (Vit Ondruch)" <v.ondruch@...> 2012/11/17

[#49467] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7377][Open] #indetical? as an alias for #equal? — "aef (Alexander E. Fischer)" <aef@...>

13 messages 2012/11/17

[#49558] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7395][Open] Negative numbers can't be primes by definition — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <zachary@...>

10 messages 2012/11/19

[#49566] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7400][Open] Incorporate OpenSSL tests from JRuby. — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <zachary@...>

11 messages 2012/11/19

[#49770] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7414][Open] Now that const_get supports "Foo::Bar" syntax, so should const_defined?. — "robertgleeson (Robert Gleeson)" <rob@...>

9 messages 2012/11/20

[#49950] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7427][Assigned] Update Rubygems — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...>

17 messages 2012/11/24

[#50043] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7429][Open] Provide options for core collections to customize behavior — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>

10 messages 2012/11/24

[#50092] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7434][Open] Allow caller_locations and backtrace_locations to receive negative params — "sam.saffron (Sam Saffron)" <sam.saffron@...>

21 messages 2012/11/25

[#50094] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7436][Open] Allow for a "granularity" flag for backtrace_locations — "sam.saffron (Sam Saffron)" <sam.saffron@...>

11 messages 2012/11/25

[#50207] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7445][Open] strptime('%s %z') doesn't work — "felipec (Felipe Contreras)" <felipe.contreras@...>

19 messages 2012/11/27

[#50424] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7485][Open] ruby cannot build on mingw32 due to missing __sync_val_compare_and_swap — "drbrain (Eric Hodel)" <drbrain@...7.net>

15 messages 2012/11/30

[#50429] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7487][Open] Cutting through the issues with Refinements — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>

13 messages 2012/11/30

[ruby-core:50406] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods

From: The 8472 <the8472@...>
Date: 2012-11-30 18:59:09 UTC
List: ruby-core #50406
> Since there still remain undefined corner case behavior in refinements, and the time is running out, I decided not to introduce full refinement for Ruby 2.0. The limited Ruby 2.0 refinement spec will be:
>
> * refinements are file scope
> * only top-level "using" is available
> * no module scope refinement
> * no refinement inheritance
> * module_eval do not introduce refinement (even for string args)

While this removes a number of potential causes of problems we're now 
stuck with a feature-set that can not cover many of the originally 
discussed use-cases.

And to support the restricted feature set we already have disagreements 
where refinements should be injected in the method hierarchy. What is 
labled as a "design decision" aren't even edge cases anymore. They're 
essential behavior of a new feature decided without much discussion or 
analysis in the context of potential uses.

For DSLs we already have BasicObject + method_missing + instance_eval, 
so only ruby literals may need some sugar added to make the DSL really 
fluent. But if you already have all the instance_eval magic going then 
you don't really want to require people to pepper their code with 
"using" just so they can use your magical DSL.

For patching broken/incompatible code Module.prepend is much better 
anyway since the breakage may occur in 3rd party code where you can't 
use "using" anyway.

So with what does this leave us? String.camelize and 2.days.ago? Those 
are supposed to be convenience methods.

If your files end up with a header of

   using "EnumeratorExtensions", "ActiveSupport::ClassNameConversions", 
"MyApplication::DateHelpers", "SomeGem::HashExtensions", 
"MyApplication::ActiveRecordExtensions", .......

That's not convenient at all anymore.


Personally I wouldn't want to use refinements as they are now. I would 
love to have a powerful tool like pointcuts or Module.prepend in my 
toolbox. Refinements wouldn't really qualify.


I'm getting the impression that refinements are getting rushed despite 
being supposed to bring a completely new axis to the language along 
which we can compose our applications. This shouldn't be happening in a 
mature language. The whole way this is going right now feels wrong to me.

So I'm asking for two things: a) please consider removing refinements 
from ruby 2.0. b) rethink how such big features should be designed in 
the future.

In This Thread

Prev Next