[#4595] New block syntax — Daniel Amelang <daniel.amelang@...>

I'm really sorry if this isn't the place to talk about this. I've

25 messages 2005/03/21
[#4606] Re: New block syntax — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/03/21

Hi --

[#4629] Re: New block syntax — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2005/03/30

On Monday 21 March 2005 16:17, David A. Black wrote:

[#4648] about REXML::Encoding — speakillof <speakillof@...>

Hi.

15 messages 2005/03/31
[#4659] Re: about REXML::Encoding — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2005/04/04

On Thursday 31 March 2005 09:44, speakillof wrote:

Re: New block syntax

From: Florian Gro<florgro@...>
Date: 2005-03-22 17:11:24 UTC
List: ruby-core #4610
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

> Could you please tell us what makes the new syntax more Perly, and the
> old syntax not Perly? Especially, please comment on the following
> examples:
> 
> Perl:       sub{ my($a,$b,$c)=@_; ... }
> Ruby(old): proc{|a,b,c| ... }
> Ruby(new):     {|a,b,c| ... }
> Self:          [|:a.:b.:c| ... ]
> Smalltalk:     [ :a :b :c| ... ]

Joy:             [ ... ]


In This Thread