[#4654] signleton_methods / methods / public_methods - weirdness? — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>
[#4666] Getting a hex representation for a Numeric — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...>
Hello,
[#4670] ruby 1.8.3 preview1 plan — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
[#4690] test failures for stable-snapshot 09/04/2005 — noreply@...
Bugs item #1762, was opened at 10-04-2005 20:46
Hello.
[#4709] BNF-like grammar specified DIRECTLY in Ruby — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
Hello everybody,
[#4712] Segfault in zlib? — Nathaniel Talbott <ntalbott@...>
I'm using rubyzip (latest gem version) and zlib (1.2.2) to do a bunch
[#4736] Trivial speedup in Array#zip — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>
[#4745] Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...>
Having taken upon me the task to provide a Windows build for
On 4/20/05, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Austin,
Hi,
On 4/24/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> wrote:
Hi,
> > > Ruby is just using AC_TYPE_UID_T. So, using typedef for them,
Hi,
On 4/26/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> wrote:
As promised, I attached a patch to eliminate the compile problems
Hi,
Thanks for the quick response!
Hi,
On 5/14/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> wrote:
[#4751] Illegal regexp causes segfault — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
irb(main):058:0> a = /\[([^]]*)\]/
Andrew Walrond, April 22:
In article <200504221210.38231.andrew@walrond.org>,
>>>>> "T" == Tanaka Akira <akr@m17n.org> writes:
[#4774] enhanced $0 modification — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...>
The attached patch allows for ruby to use more of the available stack
Hi,
[#4775] profiler.rb Schroedinbug — C Erler <erlercw@...>
A ruby program with the single instruction "require 'profile'"
>A ruby program with the single instruction "require 'profile'"
[#4807] Re: -Wall — Vincent Isambart <vincent.isambart@...>
> Why does ruby build without -Wall in CFLAGS by default? -Wall can help to
[#4815] Re: -Wall — nobu.nokada@...
Hi,
Re: New block syntax
Florian Gro<florgro@gmail.com> writes: > David A. Black wrote: > >> Ruby variables are untyped, so there's no ground for comparison. At >> *no* point does one see what type a Ruby variable is. > > There's some weird guys who like to use different constant styles > based on what they contain: > > MyClass > MY_NUMBER > > (I still dislike the latter.) Ok, I must be weird then :-9 I use CamelCaps for classes and modules only, and use LOUD_SCREAMING_C_NAMES for other kinds of constants. Makes perfect sense to me, but then maybe ETOOMUCHC in my youth. *g* -- Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@gmail.com> http://chneukirchen.org