[#4745] Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...>

Having taken upon me the task to provide a Windows build for

24 messages 2005/04/20
[#4746] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/04/20

On 4/20/05, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> wrote:

[#4747] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...> 2005/04/20

Hi Austin,

[#4762] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — nobu.nokada@... 2005/04/24

Hi,

[#4783] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...> 2005/04/25

On 4/24/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> wrote:

[#4787] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — nobu.nokada@... 2005/04/25

Hi,

[#4794] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...> 2005/04/25

> > > Ruby is just using AC_TYPE_UID_T. So, using typedef for them,

[#4751] Illegal regexp causes segfault — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>

irb(main):058:0> a = /\[([^]]*)\]/

13 messages 2005/04/22

Re: -Wall

From: "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Date: 2005-04-28 14:58:24 UTC
List: ruby-core #4809
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vincent Isambart [mailto:vincent.isambart@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:52 AM
> To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
> Subject: Re: -Wall
> 
> 
> > Why does ruby build without -Wall in CFLAGS by default? 
> -Wall can help 
> > to resolve some potential problem.
> I think it's because there may still be warnings on not well 
> tested systems, and I think the person who compiles it to use 
> it does not have to see the warnings. -Wall is only useful 
> for developers...
> 
> Cheers,
> Vincent Isambart

There "may still be warnings"?  No, there *are* warnings.  Quite a few,
in fact.  I've been harping on this for a long time now, to no avail.
See:

ruby-talk: 76910
ruby-core: 1914

etc, etc.

Regards,

Dan


In This Thread

Prev Next