[#4745] Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...>

Having taken upon me the task to provide a Windows build for

24 messages 2005/04/20
[#4746] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/04/20

On 4/20/05, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> wrote:

[#4747] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...> 2005/04/20

Hi Austin,

[#4762] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — nobu.nokada@... 2005/04/24

Hi,

[#4783] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...> 2005/04/25

On 4/24/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> wrote:

[#4787] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — nobu.nokada@... 2005/04/25

Hi,

[#4794] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...> 2005/04/25

> > > Ruby is just using AC_TYPE_UID_T. So, using typedef for them,

[#4751] Illegal regexp causes segfault — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>

irb(main):058:0> a = /\[([^]]*)\]/

13 messages 2005/04/22

Re: -Wall

From: Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...>
Date: 2005-04-29 13:39:12 UTC
List: ruby-core #4818
nobu.nokada@softhome.net, April 29:

> > I have some additional warnings(gcc-3.4, i586):
> >   * eval.c: In function `rb_exec_recursive':
> >     eval.c:13185: warning: 'result' might be used uninitialized in this
> >       function
> >   * io.c: In function `rb_io_initialize':
> >     io.c:4007: warning: 'flags' might be used uninitialized in this function
> >   * process.c:1541: warning: 'hfunc' might be used uninitialized in this 
> >       function
> >     process.c:1541: warning: 'qfunc' might be used uninitialized in this
> >       function
> >     process.c:1541: warning: 'ifunc' might be used uninitialized in this
> >       function
> >   * util.c: In function `ruby_strtod':
> >     util.c:755: warning: 'pMant' might be used uninitialized in this
> >       function

> I know, and they're all OK.

Well, why not initialize them to values that make sense?

> >   * parse.y:6585: warning: 'nodetype' defined but not used
> >     parse.y:6592: warning: 'nodeline' defined but not used
> >     
> >     I don't know how resolve it...

> They are for debug use.  Don't remove.

Perhaps they should be wrapped within #ifdef's?,
        nikolai

-- 
Nikolai Weibull: now available free of charge at http://bitwi.se/!
Born in Chicago, IL USA; currently residing in Gothenburg, Sweden.
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}

In This Thread