[#4745] Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...>

Having taken upon me the task to provide a Windows build for

24 messages 2005/04/20
[#4746] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/04/20

On 4/20/05, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> wrote:

[#4747] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...> 2005/04/20

Hi Austin,

[#4762] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — nobu.nokada@... 2005/04/24

Hi,

[#4783] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...> 2005/04/25

On 4/24/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> wrote:

[#4787] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — nobu.nokada@... 2005/04/25

Hi,

[#4794] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...> 2005/04/25

> > > Ruby is just using AC_TYPE_UID_T. So, using typedef for them,

[#4751] Illegal regexp causes segfault — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>

irb(main):058:0> a = /\[([^]]*)\]/

13 messages 2005/04/22

Re: Switching to Subversion [Was: Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings]

From: Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...>
Date: 2005-04-26 15:09:51 UTC
List: ruby-core #4798
On 4/25/05, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
> On 25 Apr 2005, at 02:38, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> 
> > BTW: The fact that public CVS has been shut down does not really help
> > getting to the sources :-)  What's the ETA for CVS to come up again?
> 
> As soon as the debian packages are updated.
> 
> > PS: Have you considered switching to Subversion? It has fewer issues
> > than CVS :-)
> 
> I would have to say that the Subversion CHANGES file disagrees with
> you.  At least one working-copy corruption bug gets fixed per release.

Heh, yes ofcourse: doesn't ruby get fixes?

> (Yes, I've wedged my working copy on numerous occasions.)  IMO, it
> still needs a good deal of polish.

Yes, I meant the server side though, as with CVS, that's a major issue
(even after all these years...)


bye,

Erik.


In This Thread