[#4745] Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...>

Having taken upon me the task to provide a Windows build for

24 messages 2005/04/20
[#4746] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/04/20

On 4/20/05, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> wrote:

[#4747] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...> 2005/04/20

Hi Austin,

[#4762] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — nobu.nokada@... 2005/04/24

Hi,

[#4783] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...> 2005/04/25

On 4/24/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> wrote:

[#4787] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — nobu.nokada@... 2005/04/25

Hi,

[#4794] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...> 2005/04/25

> > > Ruby is just using AC_TYPE_UID_T. So, using typedef for them,

[#4751] Illegal regexp causes segfault — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>

irb(main):058:0> a = /\[([^]]*)\]/

13 messages 2005/04/22

Re: -Wall

From: Vincent Isambart <vincent.isambart@...>
Date: 2005-04-28 15:59:39 UTC
List: ruby-core #4814
> > I never said that warnings are a bad thing. It's a good tool for
> > developers.
> 
> (I wasn't confroning you personally, if that's how you interpreted it.)
No problem :)

> > I just said that end users do not necessarily have to see them. A
> > developer might not mind but an end user might wonder that these
> > strange warnings are, whether Ruby will work fine or not...
> 
> How often do end users actually see these errors?  And if they
> do, they're probably curious enough to actually want to see them and
> perhaps they'll even report them to the developers, when they do.
Not very often, that's true :).
But it's not up to me to take the decision. I was just trying to
defend the current default, and the possible reasons I saw for it.
For the real reasons and the final answer I think we will have to wait
for some Japanese people to wake up tomorrow morning ;).

Cheers,
Vincent Isambart


In This Thread