[#4654] signleton_methods / methods / public_methods - weirdness? — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...>
[#4666] Getting a hex representation for a Numeric — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...>
Hello,
[#4670] ruby 1.8.3 preview1 plan — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Hi,
[#4690] test failures for stable-snapshot 09/04/2005 — noreply@...
Bugs item #1762, was opened at 10-04-2005 20:46
Hello.
[#4709] BNF-like grammar specified DIRECTLY in Ruby — Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin@...>
Hello everybody,
[#4712] Segfault in zlib? — Nathaniel Talbott <ntalbott@...>
I'm using rubyzip (latest gem version) and zlib (1.2.2) to do a bunch
[#4736] Trivial speedup in Array#zip — Mauricio Fern疣dez <batsman.geo@...>
[#4745] Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...>
Having taken upon me the task to provide a Windows build for
On 4/20/05, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Austin,
Hi,
On 4/24/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> wrote:
Hi,
> > > Ruby is just using AC_TYPE_UID_T. So, using typedef for them,
Hi,
On 4/26/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> wrote:
As promised, I attached a patch to eliminate the compile problems
Hi,
Thanks for the quick response!
Hi,
On 5/14/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> wrote:
[#4751] Illegal regexp causes segfault — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>
irb(main):058:0> a = /\[([^]]*)\]/
Andrew Walrond, April 22:
In article <200504221210.38231.andrew@walrond.org>,
>>>>> "T" == Tanaka Akira <akr@m17n.org> writes:
[#4774] enhanced $0 modification — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...>
The attached patch allows for ruby to use more of the available stack
Hi,
[#4775] profiler.rb Schroedinbug — C Erler <erlercw@...>
A ruby program with the single instruction "require 'profile'"
>A ruby program with the single instruction "require 'profile'"
[#4807] Re: -Wall — Vincent Isambart <vincent.isambart@...>
> Why does ruby build without -Wall in CFLAGS by default? -Wall can help to
[#4815] Re: -Wall — nobu.nokada@...
Hi,
Re: ICONV.rb and other encodings (about REXML::Encoding)
> > By the way, I have one proposal. > > REXML::Encoding accords ICONV.rb priority over other encodings, > > for example, EUC-JP.rb, ASCII.rb and so on. > > > > If Iconv works well, this implementation is reasonable. > > But, in some encodings, Iconv(libiconv) raises error and > > REXML stops when parsing. > This is strange, iconv works quite well. It only raises an error > when > the encoding given is wrong... And I think iconv is well tested... > Are you sure the encoding of the file is really correct? I should have explained the problem more precisely. At least in Japanese encodings, libiconv uses useless encoding table. (The word, 'useless', may be inappropriate. But, if we encode/decode Japanese string with libiconv, we sometimes meet error. ) This problem is caused by the differnce between CP932 and Unicode table of Microsoft and that of libiconv. So, in Japan, patch for libiconv is provieded and widely used. http://www2d.biglobe.ne.jp/~msyk/software/libiconv-patch.html (Sorry, this page is written in Japanese.) As I said in the previous mail, this problem should be solved in libiconv. But, the author of the patch for libiconv said that he couldn't merge his patch to libiconv. If we can't use the patch for libiconv, for example In ISP, it is difficult to use REXML because of libiconv error. In order to avoid this problem, I would like to add the option. __________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Upgrade Your Life http://bb.yahoo.co.jp/