[#4595] New block syntax — Daniel Amelang <daniel.amelang@...>

I'm really sorry if this isn't the place to talk about this. I've

25 messages 2005/03/21
[#4606] Re: New block syntax — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/03/21

Hi --

[#4629] Re: New block syntax — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2005/03/30

On Monday 21 March 2005 16:17, David A. Black wrote:

[#4648] about REXML::Encoding — speakillof <speakillof@...>

Hi.

15 messages 2005/03/31
[#4659] Re: about REXML::Encoding — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2005/04/04

On Thursday 31 March 2005 09:44, speakillof wrote:

Re: want_object? - possible?

From: Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>
Date: 2005-03-24 17:32:34 UTC
List: ruby-core #4616
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:38:54 +0900, Berger, Daniel
<Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
> I suppose there's the danger of the slippery slope, where we start
> adding more and more context checking methods, like want_lvalue?,
> want_rvalue?, etc, and things get out of control.

Um. I oppose this for the sole reason that it looks, smells, sounds,
and feels far too much like wantarray from Perl. I think that is one
of Perl's nastiest features.

-austin
-- 
Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com
               * Alternate: austin@halostatue.ca

In This Thread