[#4595] New block syntax — Daniel Amelang <daniel.amelang@...>

I'm really sorry if this isn't the place to talk about this. I've

25 messages 2005/03/21
[#4606] Re: New block syntax — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/03/21

Hi --

[#4629] Re: New block syntax — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2005/03/30

On Monday 21 March 2005 16:17, David A. Black wrote:

[#4648] about REXML::Encoding — speakillof <speakillof@...>

Hi.

15 messages 2005/03/31
[#4659] Re: about REXML::Encoding — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2005/04/04

On Thursday 31 March 2005 09:44, speakillof wrote:

Re: New block syntax

From: Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...>
Date: 2005-03-21 21:02:00 UTC
List: ruby-core #4605
On Mar 21, 2005, at 9:49 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:
> There's a fine line between terse and obfuscated, and I fear we're
> slouching towards the latter.

blah proc { preproc }, proc { postproc }

looks just plain ugly imo
anything brought in that improves
that is nice therefore :)


In This Thread