[#4522] Undefined Errno::EPROTO and the like raises NameError — "Florian Frank" <flori@...>
Hi,
[#4533] giving acces readline to rl_line_buffer — "Cs. Henk" <csaba-ml@...>
Hi!
[#4548] Ruby 1.8.2 array of hash entries functions incorrectly — noreply@...
Bugs item #1613, was opened at 2005-03-09 19:49
[#4561] rb_reg_quote weirdness — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...>
(Two weirdnesses in one day.)
Hi,
[#4567] Immutable Ropes — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...>
Note how I didn't write "Immutable Strings" in the subject.
[#4575] Allowing "?" in struct members — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#4587] 0**0==1? — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
[#4595] New block syntax — Daniel Amelang <daniel.amelang@...>
I'm really sorry if this isn't the place to talk about this. I've
Daniel Amelang wrote:
Hi --
On Monday 21 March 2005 16:17, David A. Black wrote:
Hi --
Hey David, I think that we've had some misunderstandings due to
Hi --
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 20:55, David A. Black wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2005 21:31, Daniel Amelang wrote:
[#4601] Re: New block syntax — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
> -----Original Message-----
[#4611] want_object? - possible? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#4619] Re: want_object? - possible? — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>
--- nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
Hi --
On 3/24/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
Hi --
On 4/14/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
On 14 Apr 2005, at 22:20, Mark Hubbart wrote:
On 4/15/05, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#4622] tempfile.rb — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...>
Hi,
[#4648] about REXML::Encoding — speakillof <speakillof@...>
Hi.
On Thursday 31 March 2005 09:44, speakillof wrote:
Hi.
I've tested, applied, and committed your Encoding patch, Nobu.
Hi,
Re: [patch] logger.rb - allowing logger to be innitialized in a single line
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam Roberts [mailto:sroberts@uniserve.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 1:57 PM
> To: ruby-core
> Subject: [patch] logger.rb - allowing logger to be
> innitialized in a single line
>
>
>
> I wanted to do:
>
> SomeClass.logger = Logger.new(name, shift_age = 'weekly')
> { |l| l.level = Logger::ERROR }
>
> not
>
> alogger = Logger.new(name, shift_age = 'weekly')
> alogger.level = Logger::ERROR
> SomeClass.logger = alogger
<snip>
Hm...how about this modification?
--- logger.orig Wed Mar 9 14:03:35 2005
+++ logger.rb Wed Mar 9 14:02:32 2005
@@ -246,6 +246,8 @@
# Create an instance. See Logger::LogDevice.new for more information
if
# required.
#
+ attr_accessor :logdev, :shift_age, :shift_size
+ attr_reader :level
def initialize(logdev, shift_age = 0, shift_size = 1048576)
@logdev = nil
@progname = nil
@@ -252,6 +254,7 @@
@level = DEBUG
@datetime_format = nil
@logdev = nil
+ yield self if block_given?
if logdev
@logdev = LogDevice.new(logdev, :shift_age => shift_age,
:shift_size => shift_size)
end
This is similar, but it's a little cleaner I think. I also provides
accessors for logdev, shift_age and shift_size, as well as a reader for
level, which all appear to be missing.
Regards,
Dan