ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)

[#4510] Test Failure for test_gc(Rinda::TupleSpaceTest) — noreply@...

Bugs item #1567, was opened at 02-03-2005 09:59

1 message 2005/03/02

[#4511] Minor doc fix — Emiel van de Laar <emiel@...>

Hi all,

2 messages 2005/03/04

[#4517] Re: Minor doc fix — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/03/05

[#4512] Integer.odd?/.even? — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>

Hi,

1 message 2005/03/04

[#4515] Re: Integer.odd?/.even? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

1 message 2005/03/04

[#4516] Re: Integer.odd?/.even? — Brent Roman <brent@...>

Hi,

1 message 2005/03/04

[#4518] Patch for denial of service vulnerability in WEBrick — Dominique Brezinski <dom@...>

We built a service using WEBrick with SSL enabled, and in the process

3 messages 2005/03/05

[#4519] Re: Patch for denial of service vulnerability in WEBrick — GOTOU Yuuzou <gotoyuzo@...> 2005/03/05

Hi,

[#4521] Re: Patch for denial of service vulnerability in WEBrick — Dominique Brezinski <dom@...> 2005/03/06

The patch looks good. It catches both error cases we noticed. Thanks for

[#4522] Undefined Errno::EPROTO and the like raises NameError — "Florian Frank" <flori@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2005/03/07

[#4524] Re: Undefined Errno::EPROTO and the like raises NameError — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/03/08

Hi,

[#4525] Re: Undefined Errno::EPROTO and the like raises NameError — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/03/08

Hi,

[#4530] Re: Undefined Errno::EPROTO and the like raises NameError — "Florian Frank" <flori@...> 2005/03/08

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#4527] Re: Undefined Errno::EPROTO and the like raises NameError — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/03/08

Quoting matz@ruby-lang.org, on Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:03:16AM +0900:

[#4523] Ruby's YAML parser doesn't ignore trailing whitespace — noreply@...

Bugs item #1590, was opened at 2005-03-07 15:01

1 message 2005/03/07

[#4526] Re: Undefined Errno::EPROTO and the like raises NameError — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

2 messages 2005/03/08

[#4529] Re: Undefined Errno::EPROTO and the like raises NameError — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/03/08

Hi,

[#4531] Regex.new — George Ogata <g_ogata@...>

2 messages 2005/03/08

[#4532] Re: [DOC-PATCH] Regex.new — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/03/08

Hi,

[#4533] giving acces readline to rl_line_buffer — "Cs. Henk" <csaba-ml@...>

Hi!

1 message 2005/03/09

[#4534] Win32 Non-ASCII Filename Access — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

Matz,

3 messages 2005/03/09

[#4535] Re: Win32 Non-ASCII Filename Access — Vincent Isambart <vincent.isambart@...> 2005/03/09

Hi,

[#4536] Re: Win32 Non-ASCII Filename Access — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/03/09

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 01:18:53 +0900, Vincent Isambart

[#4537] Re: Win32 Non-ASCII Filename Access — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2005/03/09

[#4538] Re: Win32 Non-ASCII Filename Access — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/03/09

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 01:38:12 +0900, Berger, Daniel

[#4539] Re: Win32 Non-ASCII Filename Access — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2005/03/09

[#4540] Re: Win32 Non-ASCII Filename Access — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/03/09

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 02:25:45 +0900, Berger, Daniel

[#4541] Re: Win32 Non-ASCII Filename Access — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2005/03/09

[#4543] Re: Win32 Non-ASCII Filename Access — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/03/09

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 04:10:17 +0900, Berger, Daniel

[#4542] logger.rb - allowing logger to be innitialized in a single line — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

1 message 2005/03/09

[#4544] Re: [patch] logger.rb - allowing logger to be innitialized in a single line — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2005/03/09

[#4545] Re: [patch] logger.rb - allowing logger to be innitialized in a single line — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/03/09

Quoting Daniel.Berger@qwest.com, on Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:16:28AM +0900:

[#4546] Re: [patch] logger.rb - allowing logger to be innitialized in a single line — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi,

1 message 2005/03/09

[#4547] Re: Win32 Non-ASCII Filename Access — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

3 messages 2005/03/09

[#4549] Re: Win32 Non-ASCII Filename Access — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/03/10

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:18:37 +0900, Berger, Daniel

[#4550] Re: Win32 Non-ASCII Filename Access — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/03/10

I wrote:

[#4548] Ruby 1.8.2 array of hash entries functions incorrectly — noreply@...

Bugs item #1613, was opened at 2005-03-09 19:49

4 messages 2005/03/10

[#4551] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1613 ] Ruby 1.8.2 array of hash entries functions incorrectly — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/03/10

Hi,

[#4553] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1613 ] Ruby 1.8.2 array of hash entries functions incorrectly — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/03/10

Hi --

[#4554] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1613 ] Ruby 1.8.2 array of hash entries functions incorrectly — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2005/03/10

On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 23:22 +0900, David A. Black wrote:

[#4555] proc and block local variables causes a [BUG] — URABE Shyouhei <s-urabe@...>

Maybe I just don't understand what is happening to the CVS but...

2 messages 2005/03/10

[#4556] Re: proc and block local variables causes a [BUG] — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/03/10

Hi,

[#4557] Time.c on Win32 — Richard Kilmer <rich@...>

Hope this is not noise for this list, but could someone explain why we

2 messages 2005/03/10

[#4558] Re: Time.c on Win32 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/03/10

Hi,

[#4559] Segmentation Fault with cygwin on winxp while running Instiki — noreply@...

Bugs item #1615, was opened at 2005-03-10 16:50

1 message 2005/03/10

[#4560] off_t weirdness — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...>

Try this on a Linux+glibc+GCC system:

3 messages 2005/03/13

[#4562] Re: off_t weirdness — Charles Mills <cmills@...> 2005/03/13

On Mar 13, 2005, at 8:31 AM, Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#4563] Re: off_t weirdness — Charles Mills <cmills@...> 2005/03/13

On Mar 13, 2005, at 2:46 PM, Charles Mills wrote:

[#4561] rb_reg_quote weirdness — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...>

(Two weirdnesses in one day.)

5 messages 2005/03/13

[#4564] Re: rb_reg_quote weirdness — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/03/14

Hi,

[#4565] Re: rb_reg_quote weirdness — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/03/15

Quoting matz@ruby-lang.org, on Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 02:35:31AM +0900:

[#4566] Re: rb_reg_quote weirdness — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...> 2005/03/15

* Sam Roberts (Mar 15, 2005 13:00):

[#4568] Re: rb_reg_quote weirdness — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/03/15

Quoting mailing-lists.ruby-core@rawuncut.elitemail.org, on Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:26:12PM +0900:

[#4567] Immutable Ropes — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...>

Note how I didn't write "Immutable Strings" in the subject.

8 messages 2005/03/15

[#4573] Re: Immutable Ropes — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/03/15

[#4574] Re: Immutable Ropes — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...> 2005/03/15

* Mathieu Bouchard (Mar 15, 2005 19:50):

[#4607] Re: Immutable Ropes — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/03/21

[#4609] Re: Immutable Ropes — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...> 2005/03/21

* Mathieu Bouchard (Mar 21, 2005 23:50):

[#4569] Re: Immutable Ropes — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/03/15

It would be useful in decoding large files like iCalendars or .vcf

[#4571] Re: Immutable Ropes — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...> 2005/03/15

* Sam Roberts (Mar 15, 2005 14:40):

[#4570] Re: Immutable Ropes — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2005/03/15

On Mar 15, 2005, at 2:18 PM, Nikolai Weibull wrote:

[#4572] RDoc - :nodoc: and macro in C — nobu.nokada@...

Hi,

1 message 2005/03/15

[#4575] Allowing "?" in struct members — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi all,

8 messages 2005/03/16

[#4577] Re: Allowing "?" in struct members — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/03/17

Hi,

[#4578] Re: Allowing "?" in struct members — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/03/17

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#4579] Re: Allowing "?" in struct members — Nathaniel Talbott <ntalbott@...> 2005/03/17

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 23:09:56 +0900, Florian Gro<florgro@gmail.com> wrote:

[#4580] Re: Allowing "?" in struct members — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/03/17

Hi,

[#4582] Re: Allowing "?" in struct members — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/03/17

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#4585] Re: Allowing "?" in struct members — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/03/18

[#4586] Re: Allowing "?" in struct members — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/03/18

[#4576] Re: Allowing "?" in struct members — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi all,

1 message 2005/03/16

[#4581] Re: Allowing "?" in struct members — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

1 message 2005/03/17

[#4583] webrick server sometimes bus errors - sometimes hangs — noreply@...

Bugs item #1641, was opened at 2005-03-17 14:48

1 message 2005/03/17

[#4584] Re: Allowing "?" in struct members — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

1 message 2005/03/17

[#4587] 0**0==1? — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>

Hi,

6 messages 2005/03/19

[#4588] Re: 0**0==1? — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2005/03/19

Bertram Scharpf <lists@bertram-scharpf.de> writes:

[#4589] Re: 0**0==1? — Alexandru Popescu <alexandru.popescu@...> 2005/03/19

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#4615] Re: 0**0==1? — Johan Holmberg <holmberg@...> 2005/03/23

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005, Alexandru Popescu wrote:

[#4590] Re: 0**0==1? — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...> 2005/03/19

Hi,

[#4591] Re: 0**0==1? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/03/20

[#4592] soap4r and nws.noaa.gov — tsuraan <tsuraan@...>

I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask this, but has anyone

2 messages 2005/03/20

[#4593] Re: soap4r and nws.noaa.gov — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2005/03/20

Quoting tsuraan@xyons.net, on Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 10:27:58AM +0900:

[#4594] bug fixes and extensions to resolv.rb for mDNS support — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

Fyi, net-mdns-0.1 contains modified versions of resolv.rb and

1 message 2005/03/20

[#4595] New block syntax — Daniel Amelang <daniel.amelang@...>

I'm really sorry if this isn't the place to talk about this. I've

25 messages 2005/03/21

[#4597] Re: New block syntax — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/03/21

Daniel Amelang wrote:

[#4598] Re: New block syntax — Michael Walter <michael.walter@...> 2005/03/21

On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:42:01 +0900, Florian Gro<florgro@gmail.com> wrote:

[#4599] Re: New block syntax — Alexandru Popescu <alexandru.popescu@...> 2005/03/21

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[#4600] Re: New block syntax — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/03/21

Michael Walter wrote:

[#4606] Re: New block syntax — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/03/21

Hi --

[#4629] Re: New block syntax — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2005/03/30

On Monday 21 March 2005 16:17, David A. Black wrote:

[#4631] Re: New block syntax — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/03/30

Hi --

[#4633] Re: New block syntax — Daniel Amelang <daniel.amelang@...> 2005/03/31

Hey David, I think that we've had some misunderstandings due to

[#4634] Re: New block syntax — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/03/31

Hi --

[#4635] Re: New block syntax — Daniel Amelang <daniel.amelang@...> 2005/03/31

> I prefer that the constructor (and the person reading the code from

[#4639] Re: New block syntax — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2005/03/31

On Wednesday 30 March 2005 20:55, David A. Black wrote:

[#4641] Re: New block syntax — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/03/31

Hi --

[#4642] Re: New block syntax — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/03/31

David A. Black wrote:

[#4651] Re: New block syntax — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2005/04/02

Florian Gro<florgro@gmail.com> writes:

[#4658] Re: New block syntax — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/04/04

[#4660] Re: New block syntax — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2005/04/04

Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> writes:

[#4644] Re: New block syntax — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/03/31

Hi --

[#4640] Re: New block syntax — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2005/03/31

On Thursday 31 March 2005 13:53, Sean E. Russell wrote:

[#4638] Re: New block syntax — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2005/03/31

On Wednesday 30 March 2005 08:04, David A. Black wrote:

[#4628] Re: New block syntax — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2005/03/30

On Sunday 20 March 2005 21:31, Daniel Amelang wrote:

[#4630] Re: New block syntax — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/03/30

Hi --

[#4637] Re: New block syntax — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2005/03/31

On Wednesday 30 March 2005 07:55, David A. Black wrote:

[#4646] Re: New block syntax — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/03/31

On Mar 31, 2005 6:44 AM, Sean E. Russell <ser@germane-software.com> wrote:

[#4643] Re: New block syntax — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/03/31

On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Sean E. Russell wrote:

[#4596] Sorry — Daniel Amelang <daniel.amelang@...>

Whoops, I realize now that my last post should have gone to ruby-dev, sorry!

1 message 2005/03/21

[#4601] Re: New block syntax — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

5 messages 2005/03/21

[#4603] Re: New block syntax — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2005/03/21

[#4610] Re: New block syntax — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/03/22

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#4613] Re: New block syntax — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2005/03/22

[#4602] Re: New block syntax — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2005/03/21

Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#4604] Re: New block syntax — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

3 messages 2005/03/21

[#4605] Re: New block syntax — Alexander Kellett <ruby-lists@...> 2005/03/21

On Mar 21, 2005, at 9:49 PM, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#4608] Re: New block syntax — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2005/03/21

On Tuesday, March 22, 2005, 8:02:00 AM, Alexander wrote:

[#4611] want_object? - possible? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi all,

4 messages 2005/03/22

[#4616] Re: want_object? - possible? — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/03/24

On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:38:54 +0900, Berger, Daniel

[#4714] Re: want_object? - possible? — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/04/14

On 3/24/05, Austin Ziegler <halostatue@gmail.com> wrote:

[#4618] Re: want_object? - possible? — nobu.nokada@... 2005/03/24

Hi,

[#4612] URI.parse and Socket.getaddrinfo don't cooperate with IPv6 addresses — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

irb(main):002:0> URI.parse("http://[::1]").host

1 message 2005/03/22

[#4614] Re: New block syntax — Daniel Amelang <daniel.amelang@...>

I fear that my mistake in posting to the wrong list has polluted

1 message 2005/03/22

[#4617] Re: want_object? - possible? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

1 message 2005/03/24

[#4619] Re: want_object? - possible? — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

--- nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

9 messages 2005/03/25

[#4620] Re: want_object? - possible? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/03/25

Hi --

[#4711] Re: want_object? - possible? — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/04/14

On 3/24/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:

[#4717] Re: want_object? - possible? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/04/14

Hi --

[#4718] Re: want_object? - possible? — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/04/15

On 4/14/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:

[#4719] return_value? [Was: Re: want_object? - possible?] — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2005/04/15

On 14 Apr 2005, at 22:20, Mark Hubbart wrote:

[#4724] Re: return_value? [Was: Re: want_object? - possible?] — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/04/15

On 4/15/05, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:

[#4725] Re: return_value? [Was: Re: want_object? - possible?] — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2005/04/15

On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Mark Hubbart wrote:

[#4727] Re: return_value? [Was: Re: want_object? - possible?] — Mark Hubbart <discordantus@...> 2005/04/15

On 4/15/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:

[#4621] [PATCH] Bugfixes to ripper HEAD - broken depend, and regexp_literal lacks options — noreply@...

Bugs item #1688, was opened at 2005-03-25 22:01

1 message 2005/03/25

[#4622] tempfile.rb — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2005/03/26

[#4786] Re: [PATCH] tempfile.rb — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...> 2005/04/25

Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@code-monkey.de> [2005-03-27 02:49]:

[#4788] Re: [PATCH] tempfile.rb — nobu.nokada@... 2005/04/25

Hi,

[#4789] Re: [PATCH] tempfile.rb — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...> 2005/04/25

nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> [2005-04-25 23:27]:

[#4623] getRootWindow() error — noreply@...

Bugs item #1691, was opened at 2005-03-28 12:10

3 messages 2005/03/28

[#4624] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1691 ] getRootWindow() error — Lyle Johnson <lyle.johnson@...> 2005/03/28

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:15:49 +0900, noreply@rubyforge.org

[#4625] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-1691 ] getRootWindow() error — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2005/03/28

On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 22:54 +0900, Lyle Johnson wrote:

[#4626] Is there something wrong with the GC? — "Wim van den Bos" <home@...>

I tried the following script:

1 message 2005/03/28

[#4627] [drb/ssl] Undefined method verbose. — noreply@...

Bugs item #1701, was opened at 2005-03-29 23:21

1 message 2005/03/29

[#4632] net/imap + openssl hangs — noreply@...

Bugs item #1706, was opened at 30/03/2005 23:04

1 message 2005/03/30

[#4636] Minor doc fix (numeric.c) — Emiel van de Laar <emiel@...>

Hi list,

2 messages 2005/03/31

[#4645] Re: Minor doc fix (numeric.c) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2005/03/31

Hi,

[#4647] Re: New block syntax — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

1 message 2005/03/31

[#4648] about REXML::Encoding — speakillof <speakillof@...>

Hi.

15 messages 2005/03/31

[#4659] Re: about REXML::Encoding — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2005/04/04

On Thursday 31 March 2005 09:44, speakillof wrote:

[#4661] Re: about REXML::Encoding — speakillof <speakillof@...> 2005/04/04

Hi.

[#4684] Re: about REXML::Encoding — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2005/04/09

I've tested, applied, and committed your Encoding patch, Nobu.

[#4688] Re: about REXML::Encoding — nobu.nokada@... 2005/04/10

Hi,

[#4694] Re: about REXML::Encoding — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2005/04/11

On Sunday 10 April 2005 08:24, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#4696] Re: about REXML::Encoding — nobu.nokada@... 2005/04/11

Hi,

[#4700] Re: about REXML::Encoding — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2005/04/13

On Monday 11 April 2005 09:16, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#4701] Re: about REXML::Encoding — nobu.nokada@... 2005/04/13

Hi,

[#4695] Re: about REXML::Encoding — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2005/04/11

On Sunday 10 April 2005 08:24, nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:

[#4697] Re: about REXML::Encoding — nobu.nokada@... 2005/04/11

Hi,

[#4702] ICONV.rb and other encodings (about REXML::Encoding) — speakillof <speakillof@...> 2005/04/13

Thank you for adopting nobu's patch.

[#4703] Re: ICONV.rb and other encodings (about REXML::Encoding) — Vincent Isambart <vincent.isambart@...> 2005/04/13

Hi,

[#4704] Re: ICONV.rb and other encodings (about REXML::Encoding) — speakillof <speakillof@...> 2005/04/13

> > By the way, I have one proposal.

[#4705] Re: ICONV.rb and other encodings (about REXML::Encoding) — Vincent Isambart <vincent.isambart@...> 2005/04/13

Hi,

Re: New block syntax

From: "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Date: 2005-03-21 20:49:11 UTC

List: ruby-core #4604

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mathieu Bouchard [mailto:matju@sympatico.ca] 
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 1:40 PM
> To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
> Subject: Re: New block syntax
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Berger, Daniel wrote:
> 
> > I extremely DISLIKE the new proposed syntax for 
> proc/blocks.  I would 
> > rather we kept lambda/proc keyword mandatory, rather than 
> end up with 
> > goofball syntax like the above, just so we can make anonymous procs 
> > more Perly.
> 
> Could you please tell us what makes the new syntax more 
> Perly, and the old syntax not Perly? Especially, please 
> comment on the following
> examples:

I was thinking of sub references in Perl/Tk actually.  But, the "Perly"
mention is hardly the point of my jab.  My point is that the new syntax
looks bad and will cause no end of confusion with Hash syntax now and
into the future, IMHO.  I just don't understand the push to alter
existing syntax all so we can avoid typing the word "proc".

There's a fine line between terse and obfuscated, and I fear we're
slouching towards the latter.

Regards,

Dan

Thread

In This Thread

Prev Next