[#4522] Undefined Errno::EPROTO and the like raises NameError — "Florian Frank" <flori@...>
Hi,
[#4533] giving acces readline to rl_line_buffer — "Cs. Henk" <csaba-ml@...>
Hi!
[#4548] Ruby 1.8.2 array of hash entries functions incorrectly — noreply@...
Bugs item #1613, was opened at 2005-03-09 19:49
[#4561] rb_reg_quote weirdness — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...>
(Two weirdnesses in one day.)
Hi,
[#4567] Immutable Ropes — Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-core@...>
Note how I didn't write "Immutable Strings" in the subject.
[#4575] Allowing "?" in struct members — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#4587] 0**0==1? — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
[#4595] New block syntax — Daniel Amelang <daniel.amelang@...>
I'm really sorry if this isn't the place to talk about this. I've
Daniel Amelang wrote:
Hi --
On Monday 21 March 2005 16:17, David A. Black wrote:
Hi --
Hey David, I think that we've had some misunderstandings due to
Hi --
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 20:55, David A. Black wrote:
On Sunday 20 March 2005 21:31, Daniel Amelang wrote:
[#4601] Re: New block syntax — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
> -----Original Message-----
[#4611] want_object? - possible? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi all,
[#4619] Re: want_object? - possible? — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>
--- nobu.nokada@softhome.net wrote:
Hi --
On 3/24/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
Hi --
On 4/14/05, David A. Black <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
On 14 Apr 2005, at 22:20, Mark Hubbart wrote:
On 4/15/05, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#4622] tempfile.rb — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...>
Hi,
[#4648] about REXML::Encoding — speakillof <speakillof@...>
Hi.
On Thursday 31 March 2005 09:44, speakillof wrote:
Hi.
I've tested, applied, and committed your Encoding patch, Nobu.
Hi,
Re: Win32 Non-ASCII Filename Access
> -----Original Message----- > From: Austin Ziegler [mailto:halostatue@gmail.com] <snip> > > IF the UNICODE macro is set. Basically, most Windows functions look > > like this: > > I know. > > UNFORTUNATELY, to get that to work, you also have to use > TCHAR as your character type. That is, instead of: > > char* spec = "C:\\Foo\\Bar\\*.*"; > > you need: > > TCHAR* spec = "C:\\Foo\\Bar\\*.*"; > > This may cause *other* problems with Ruby, since it seemss to > be written around the assumption that a character is a single > byte wide. That isn't my understanding, though perhaps I'm not "getting it". From what I've read, TCHAR is 2 bytes wide if UNICODE is defined. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/intl/un icode_28c3.asp Or is the problem in the Ruby handling of TCHAR's and not TCHAR itself? > Ultimately, the only acceptable way to do this is to NOT use > TCHAR, but to explicitly use the wide versions of functions > and do MultibyteToWide and WideToMultibyte calls as > necessary. The best choice for this will be, of course, UTF-8 > (CP_UTF8), but if we're not in UTF-8 mode, we can always use > ANSI (CP_ACP) and get the exact same behaviour. Better, we > get to choose the mode of behaviour at run-time. Ugh. I really hope this isn't necessary. > I do NOT recommend the use of TCHAR and _TEXT; they are > Microsoftisms, and they won't be compatible with standard > Ruby, I don't think. I definitely think we should test this. Any suggestions how? Regards, Dan