[#4745] Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...>

Having taken upon me the task to provide a Windows build for

24 messages 2005/04/20
[#4746] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...> 2005/04/20

On 4/20/05, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> wrote:

[#4747] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...> 2005/04/20

Hi Austin,

[#4762] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — nobu.nokada@... 2005/04/24

Hi,

[#4783] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...> 2005/04/25

On 4/24/05, nobu.nokada@softhome.net <nobu.nokada@softhome.net> wrote:

[#4787] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — nobu.nokada@... 2005/04/25

Hi,

[#4794] Re: Win32: Ruby & APR; build problems for Ruby Subversion SWIG bindings — Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@...> 2005/04/25

> > > Ruby is just using AC_TYPE_UID_T. So, using typedef for them,

[#4751] Illegal regexp causes segfault — Andrew Walrond <andrew@...>

irb(main):058:0> a = /\[([^]]*)\]/

13 messages 2005/04/22

Re: New block syntax

From: Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...>
Date: 2005-04-04 14:01:08 UTC
List: ruby-core #4660
Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> writes:

> On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
>
>> Makes perfect sense to me, but then maybe ETOOMUCHC in my youth. *g*
>
> I already have told several people about this line you just
> wrote.

Does that mean I'm famous now?

> When was your youth again? ;-)

Hey, I'm talking about mental age. *scnr*

> You remind me of when I first entered university. I loved to joke like
> this by saying "back in my day, computers were this and that" although
> I was the youngest person in the whole department. :-}

:P

> Btw I just acquired some of the computers I've used as a kid. Those
> use 8/16-bit processors (Motorola 6809) clocked at 890 kHz. If a can
> get a hand on a C compiler for it then I could attempt to port Ruby
> there (just kidding)

It's not been too long since I developed on a Pentium 90... and I had
some random 4.77Mhz box around too.

--
Christian Neukirchen  <chneukirchen@gmail.com>  http://chneukirchen.org

In This Thread

Prev Next