[#35027] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4352][Open] [patch] Fix eval(s, b) backtrace; make eval(s, b) consistent with eval(s) — "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@...>
Bug #4352: [patch] Fix eval(s, b) backtrace; make eval(s, b) consistent with eval(s)
Issue #4352 has been updated by James M. Lawrence.
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:
Hi,
[#35036] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4354][Open] File.realdirpath is expected to test for real file. — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
Bug #4354: File.realdirpath is expected to test for real file.
[#35055] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4359][Open] regular expressions created with Regexp::FIXEDENCODING have incorrect inspect — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>
Bug #4359: regular expressions created with Regexp::FIXEDENCODING have incorrect inspect
[#35071] Bug in system()? — Anthony Wright <anthony@...>
I've just hit a problem where the system() method to call an external program failed in a fairly unpredictable way, and I couldn't get any clues from within ruby to diagnose the problem. As a result I ended up debugging process.c to work out what the problem was.
[#35100] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4370][Open] Abort trap in net/http — David Phillips <redmine@...>
Bug #4370: Abort trap in net/http
[#35114] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4373][Open] http.rb:677: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Christian Fazzini <redmine@...>
Bug #4373: http.rb:677: [BUG] Segmentation fault
[#35144] Documentation Clarifications to Array methods rotate, rotate!, index, and rindex — Loren Sands-Ramshaw <lorensr@...>
Tue Feb 8 11:47:11 2011 Loren Sands-Ramshaw <lorensr@gmail.com>
[#35146] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4383][Assigned] psych fails to parse a symbol in a flow sequence — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...>
Bug #4383: psych fails to parse a symbol in a flow sequence
[#35167] Redmine misconfigured (was Re: Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4340] Encoding of result string for String#gsub is not consistent) — mathew <meta@...>
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 16:27, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#35171] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4386][Open] encoding: directive does not affect regex expressions — mathew murphy <redmine@...>
Bug #4386: encoding: directive does not affect regex expressions
[#35202] Patch to Net::InternetMessageIO — Daniel Cormier <daniel.cormier@...>
This patch addresses an issue when sending a message with Net::SMTP
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:13, Daniel Cormier <daniel.cormier@gmail.com> wrote:
Perhaps that is a better solution, but shouldn't sending a message
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 17:08, Daniel Cormier <daniel.cormier@gmail.com> wrote:
Ok, but since the period escaping is already being done (just with
[#35237] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4400][Open] nested at_exit hooks run in strange order — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>
Bug #4400: nested at_exit hooks run in strange order
Issue #4400 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.
[#35332] [ANN] Planned maintenance of redmine.ruby-lang.org — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#35340] odd require behavior — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all.
[#35355] eval'ing large strings runs out of stack space? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all.
[#35356] suggestion: default irb to saving history — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all.
[#35376] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4447] [Open] add String#byteslice() method — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...>
string.force_encoding(ENCODING::BINARY).slice almost does what you want,
[ruby-core:35310] Re: Patch to Net::InternetMessageIO
Ok, but since the period escaping is already being done (just with this one bug), what has to happen for this patch to be applied so other people don't run into this problem in a production system like I did? It seems like waiting for BDAT support to be implemented before fixing a bug with period escaping (which is already being done and will still have to be done) for the DATA command is not the best experience for ruby users. Would you agree? On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 4:09 PM, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 17:08, Daniel Cormier <daniel.cormier@gmail.com> wrote: >> Perhaps that is a better solution, but shouldn't sending a message >> using DATA work properly whether in ESMTP mode or not? > > Yes, and the solution I proposed would work in ESMTP mode and also in > legacy SMTP mode. In ESMTP mode net/smtp would send the data verbatim; > in legacy SMTP mode it would perform the quoting as per your patch. > > Basically, I don't think it's a good idea to perform unnecessary > quoting of data when in ESMTP mode. > > > mathew > -- > <URL:http://www.pobox.com/~meta/> > >