[#35027] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4352][Open] [patch] Fix eval(s, b) backtrace; make eval(s, b) consistent with eval(s) — "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@...>

Bug #4352: [patch] Fix eval(s, b) backtrace; make eval(s, b) consistent with eval(s)

16 messages 2011/02/01

[#35114] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4373][Open] http.rb:677: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Christian Fazzini <redmine@...>

Bug #4373: http.rb:677: [BUG] Segmentation fault

59 messages 2011/02/06

[#35171] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4386][Open] encoding: directive does not affect regex expressions — mathew murphy <redmine@...>

Bug #4386: encoding: directive does not affect regex expressions

9 messages 2011/02/09

[#35237] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4400][Open] nested at_exit hooks run in strange order — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Bug #4400: nested at_exit hooks run in strange order

12 messages 2011/02/15

[ruby-core:35314] Re: Patch to Net::InternetMessageIO

From: mathew <meta@...>
Date: 2011-02-19 15:59:36 UTC
List: ruby-core #35314
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 23:41, Daniel Cormier <daniel.cormier@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems like waiting for BDAT support to be implemented before fixing
> a bug with period escaping (which is already being done and will still
> have to be done) for the DATA command is not the best experience for
> ruby users. Would you agree?

I just noticed that net/protocol.rb says

# WARNING: This file is going to remove.
# Do not rely on the implementation written in this file.

So it seems like it was never intended to be production-ready in the
first place, so I'm not sure why it got included in Ruby.


mathew
-- 
<URL:http://www.pobox.com/~meta/>

In This Thread