[#35027] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4352][Open] [patch] Fix eval(s, b) backtrace; make eval(s, b) consistent with eval(s) — "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@...>

Bug #4352: [patch] Fix eval(s, b) backtrace; make eval(s, b) consistent with eval(s)

16 messages 2011/02/01

[#35114] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4373][Open] http.rb:677: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Christian Fazzini <redmine@...>

Bug #4373: http.rb:677: [BUG] Segmentation fault

59 messages 2011/02/06

[#35171] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4386][Open] encoding: directive does not affect regex expressions — mathew murphy <redmine@...>

Bug #4386: encoding: directive does not affect regex expressions

9 messages 2011/02/09

[#35237] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4400][Open] nested at_exit hooks run in strange order — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Bug #4400: nested at_exit hooks run in strange order

12 messages 2011/02/15

[ruby-core:35260] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4402][Open] Include an "in" operator

From: Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <redmine@...>
Date: 2011-02-16 11:45:10 UTC
List: ruby-core #35260
Feature #4402: Include an "in" operator
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/4402

Author: Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
Status: Open, Priority: Normal

It would be great to support the syntax

return if result in [nil, 'exit', 'quit']

which is a more humanized way to write

return if [nil, 'exit', 'quit'].include? result

The syntax is already support in for-in loops:

for i in ['a', 'b', 'c']; puts i; end


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next