[#35027] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4352][Open] [patch] Fix eval(s, b) backtrace; make eval(s, b) consistent with eval(s) — "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@...>

Bug #4352: [patch] Fix eval(s, b) backtrace; make eval(s, b) consistent with eval(s)

16 messages 2011/02/01

[#35114] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4373][Open] http.rb:677: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Christian Fazzini <redmine@...>

Bug #4373: http.rb:677: [BUG] Segmentation fault

59 messages 2011/02/06

[#35171] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4386][Open] encoding: directive does not affect regex expressions — mathew murphy <redmine@...>

Bug #4386: encoding: directive does not affect regex expressions

9 messages 2011/02/09

[#35237] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4400][Open] nested at_exit hooks run in strange order — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Bug #4400: nested at_exit hooks run in strange order

12 messages 2011/02/15

[ruby-core:35157] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4383] psych fails to parse a symbol in a flow sequence

From: Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
Date: 2011-02-08 22:55:57 UTC
List: ruby-core #35157
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 10:07:09PM +0900, Yuki Sonoda wrote:
> Issue #4383 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
> 
> 
> According to YAML 1.1 spec. http://yaml.org/spec/1.1,  any flow node can occur as an element of a flow sequence, a ns-flow-node(n,c) can be a ns-plain-single(c) where c = flow-in, and a ns-plain-single(c) can start with ':' by definition of ns-plain-first-char(c). 
> 
> I think it is a valid YAML 1.1.  Is it wrong?

I think you are correct.  However, that means this is a bug in libyaml.
I've emailed the libyaml mailing list to find out if we're interpreting
the spec correctly.

-- 
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/

In This Thread