[#35027] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4352][Open] [patch] Fix eval(s, b) backtrace; make eval(s, b) consistent with eval(s) — "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@...>

Bug #4352: [patch] Fix eval(s, b) backtrace; make eval(s, b) consistent with eval(s)

16 messages 2011/02/01

[#35114] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4373][Open] http.rb:677: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Christian Fazzini <redmine@...>

Bug #4373: http.rb:677: [BUG] Segmentation fault

59 messages 2011/02/06

[#35171] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4386][Open] encoding: directive does not affect regex expressions — mathew murphy <redmine@...>

Bug #4386: encoding: directive does not affect regex expressions

9 messages 2011/02/09

[#35237] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4400][Open] nested at_exit hooks run in strange order — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Bug #4400: nested at_exit hooks run in strange order

12 messages 2011/02/15

[ruby-core:35107] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4363][Open] Ruby segfaults when any gem module is required

From: Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
Date: 2011-02-06 02:23:40 UTC
List: ruby-core #35107
Hi,

At Fri, 4 Feb 2011 05:16:32 +0900,
Geoff W. wrote in [ruby-core:35076]:
> ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2p136 (2010-12-25 revision 30365) [x86_64-linux]
> 
> Test file 1 (test.rb):
> # Begin
> require "mysql"
> # End
> 
> Test file 2 (test2.rb):
> # Begin
> require "active_record"
> # End

I can't reproduce it.  How did you compile and install that ruby?

-- 
Nobu Nakada

In This Thread

Prev Next