[#35027] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4352][Open] [patch] Fix eval(s, b) backtrace; make eval(s, b) consistent with eval(s) — "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@...>
Bug #4352: [patch] Fix eval(s, b) backtrace; make eval(s, b) consistent with eval(s)
Issue #4352 has been updated by James M. Lawrence.
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:
Hi,
[#35036] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4354][Open] File.realdirpath is expected to test for real file. — Luis Lavena <redmine@...>
Bug #4354: File.realdirpath is expected to test for real file.
[#35055] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4359][Open] regular expressions created with Regexp::FIXEDENCODING have incorrect inspect — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>
Bug #4359: regular expressions created with Regexp::FIXEDENCODING have incorrect inspect
[#35071] Bug in system()? — Anthony Wright <anthony@...>
I've just hit a problem where the system() method to call an external program failed in a fairly unpredictable way, and I couldn't get any clues from within ruby to diagnose the problem. As a result I ended up debugging process.c to work out what the problem was.
[#35100] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4370][Open] Abort trap in net/http — David Phillips <redmine@...>
Bug #4370: Abort trap in net/http
[#35114] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4373][Open] http.rb:677: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Christian Fazzini <redmine@...>
Bug #4373: http.rb:677: [BUG] Segmentation fault
[#35144] Documentation Clarifications to Array methods rotate, rotate!, index, and rindex — Loren Sands-Ramshaw <lorensr@...>
Tue Feb 8 11:47:11 2011 Loren Sands-Ramshaw <lorensr@gmail.com>
[#35146] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4383][Assigned] psych fails to parse a symbol in a flow sequence — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...>
Bug #4383: psych fails to parse a symbol in a flow sequence
[#35167] Redmine misconfigured (was Re: Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4340] Encoding of result string for String#gsub is not consistent) — mathew <meta@...>
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 16:27, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#35171] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4386][Open] encoding: directive does not affect regex expressions — mathew murphy <redmine@...>
Bug #4386: encoding: directive does not affect regex expressions
[#35202] Patch to Net::InternetMessageIO — Daniel Cormier <daniel.cormier@...>
This patch addresses an issue when sending a message with Net::SMTP
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:13, Daniel Cormier <daniel.cormier@gmail.com> wrote:
Perhaps that is a better solution, but shouldn't sending a message
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 17:08, Daniel Cormier <daniel.cormier@gmail.com> wrote:
Ok, but since the period escaping is already being done (just with
[#35237] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4400][Open] nested at_exit hooks run in strange order — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>
Bug #4400: nested at_exit hooks run in strange order
Issue #4400 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.
[#35332] [ANN] Planned maintenance of redmine.ruby-lang.org — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#35340] odd require behavior — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all.
[#35355] eval'ing large strings runs out of stack space? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all.
[#35356] suggestion: default irb to saving history — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all.
[#35376] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4447] [Open] add String#byteslice() method — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...>
string.force_encoding(ENCODING::BINARY).slice almost does what you want,
[ruby-core:35237] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4400][Open] nested at_exit hooks run in strange order
Bug #4400: nested at_exit hooks run in strange order
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/4400
Author: Suraj Kurapati
Status: Open, Priority: Normal
Category: core
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2p136 (2010-12-25 revision 30365) [x86_64-linux]
Hello,
The documentation for Kernel#at_exit says "If multiple [at_exit] handlers are
registered, they are executed in reverse order of registration". However, does
not seem to be true for nested at_exit hooks (registering an at_exit hook inside
another at_exit hook). For example consider this code:
at_exit { puts :outer0 }
at_exit { puts :outer1_begin; at_exit { puts :inner1 }; puts :outer1_end }
at_exit { puts :outer2_begin; at_exit { puts :inner2 }; puts :outer2_end }
at_exit { puts :outer3 }
Here is the output of running this code with two Rubies:
ruby 1.9.2p136 (2010-12-25 revision 30365) [x86_64-linux]
outer3
outer2_begin
outer2_end
outer1_begin
outer1_end
outer0
inner1
inner2
ruby 1.8.7 (2010-08-16 patchlevel 302) [x86_64-linux]
outer3
outer2_begin
outer2_end
outer1_begin
outer1_end
outer0
inner1
inner2
Observe how inner1 and inner2 are executed in registration order after all
non-nested hooks are executed in reverse registration order. This seems very
strange to me; I would expect nested at_exit hooks to be executed immediately
(as follows) because we are already inside the at_exit phase of the program:
outer3
outer2_begin
inner2
outer2_end
outer1_begin
inner1
outer1_end
outer0
What do you think? Thanks for your consideration.
----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org