[#35027] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4352][Open] [patch] Fix eval(s, b) backtrace; make eval(s, b) consistent with eval(s) — "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@...>

Bug #4352: [patch] Fix eval(s, b) backtrace; make eval(s, b) consistent with eval(s)

16 messages 2011/02/01

[#35114] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4373][Open] http.rb:677: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Christian Fazzini <redmine@...>

Bug #4373: http.rb:677: [BUG] Segmentation fault

59 messages 2011/02/06

[#35171] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4386][Open] encoding: directive does not affect regex expressions — mathew murphy <redmine@...>

Bug #4386: encoding: directive does not affect regex expressions

9 messages 2011/02/09

[#35237] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4400][Open] nested at_exit hooks run in strange order — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Bug #4400: nested at_exit hooks run in strange order

12 messages 2011/02/15

[ruby-core:35371] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4438] [Open] rescue args type check omitted

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2011-02-24 14:27:53 UTC
List: ruby-core #35371
Hi,

In message "Re: [ruby-core:35364] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4438] [Open] rescue args type check omitted"
    on Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:07:03 +0900, Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@gmail.com> writes:

|Rescue arg must be class or module in 1.8. 1.9 looks to ignore when it's not a class or module.
|Is this expected behavior?

No, it should check as 1.8 does.

							matz.

In This Thread