[#35027] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4352][Open] [patch] Fix eval(s, b) backtrace; make eval(s, b) consistent with eval(s) — "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@...>

Bug #4352: [patch] Fix eval(s, b) backtrace; make eval(s, b) consistent with eval(s)

16 messages 2011/02/01

[#35114] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4373][Open] http.rb:677: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Christian Fazzini <redmine@...>

Bug #4373: http.rb:677: [BUG] Segmentation fault

59 messages 2011/02/06

[#35171] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4386][Open] encoding: directive does not affect regex expressions — mathew murphy <redmine@...>

Bug #4386: encoding: directive does not affect regex expressions

9 messages 2011/02/09

[#35237] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4400][Open] nested at_exit hooks run in strange order — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Bug #4400: nested at_exit hooks run in strange order

12 messages 2011/02/15

[ruby-core:35140] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4352] [patch] Fix eval(s, b) backtrace; make eval(s, b) consistent with eval(s)

From: "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@...>
Date: 2011-02-07 18:22:34 UTC
List: ruby-core #35140
Issue #4352 has been updated by James M. Lawrence.


Yusuke Endoh:
> However, it might be considered a bug for Kernel#eval to ignore
> an explicitly specified "(eval)", I think.
>
> Does that answer you?

Yes, thanks. Redmine doesn't have a category for bugs that are fixed
by a feature request :). As Rocky explains there are some deeper
issues involved, but it still amounts to a feature request. I've filed
a new bug for "(eval)" [ruby-core:35139]. Sorry for the confusion.

----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/4352

----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next