[#35027] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4352][Open] [patch] Fix eval(s, b) backtrace; make eval(s, b) consistent with eval(s) — "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@...>

Bug #4352: [patch] Fix eval(s, b) backtrace; make eval(s, b) consistent with eval(s)

16 messages 2011/02/01

[#35114] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4373][Open] http.rb:677: [BUG] Segmentation fault — Christian Fazzini <redmine@...>

Bug #4373: http.rb:677: [BUG] Segmentation fault

59 messages 2011/02/06

[#35171] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4386][Open] encoding: directive does not affect regex expressions — mathew murphy <redmine@...>

Bug #4386: encoding: directive does not affect regex expressions

9 messages 2011/02/09

[#35237] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4400][Open] nested at_exit hooks run in strange order — Suraj Kurapati <redmine@...>

Bug #4400: nested at_exit hooks run in strange order

12 messages 2011/02/15

[ruby-core:35312] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4373] http.rb:677: [BUG] Segmentation fault

From: Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...>
Date: 2011-02-19 12:34:24 UTC
List: ruby-core #35312
On 19 February 2011 03:08, Christian Fazzini <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Issue #4373 has been updated by Christian Fazzini.
>
> Benoit, I'll go through those steps you suggested.
>
> By the way, is 1.9.3 safe to use in production? Any reason, why you didnt try reproducing in 1.9.2?

Probably not, it's always better to use a release, but I can't judge.

I just tested with ruby 1.9.2p136 (2010-12-25 revision 30363)
[x86_64-darwin10.5.0], and I can't reproduce either.

In This Thread