[#30545] [Ann] Contribution wanted: identify tickets for 1.9.2 release — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
Hi all --
[#30558] [Feature #3380] Minitest Runner Command — Thomas Sawyer <redmine@...>
Feature #3380: Minitest Runner Command
[#30592] [Bug #3392] Kernel.open Ignores :binmode Key in Opts Hash w.r.t Encoding — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #3392: Kernel.open Ignores :binmode Key in Opts Hash w.r.t Encoding
[#30602] The `open` Methods and Their Many Arguments — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...>
I'm documenting Kernel.open, and the related .open methods, for a book
[#30607] [Bug #3395] Ruby does not appear to build against openssl-1.0.0a — Rebecca Menessecc <redmine@...>
Bug #3395: Ruby does not appear to build against openssl-1.0.0a
[#30656] Promote RubyInstaller as better alternative in ruby-lang.org — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
[#30672] [Bug #3411] Time.local 1916,5,1 #=> 1916-04-30 23:00:00 +0100 — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>
Bug #3411: Time.local 1916,5,1 #=> 1916-04-30 23:00:00 +0100
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Benoit Daloze <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#30697] [Bug #3418] IO#putc Clobbers Multi-byte Characters — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #3418: IO#putc Clobbers Multi-byte Characters
[#30707] [Bug #3420] Module#method calling <=> causes SystemStackError — Florian Aßmann <redmine@...>
Bug #3420: Module#method calling <=> causes SystemStackError
[#30722] [Feature #3424] Source code interaction. [new ideas for ruby 2] — Eloy Esp <redmine@...>
Feature #3424: Source code interaction. [new ideas for ruby 2]
[#30734] [Bug #3428] ri outputs ansi escape sequences even when stdout is not a tty — caleb clausen <redmine@...>
Bug #3428: ri outputs ansi escape sequences even when stdout is not a tty
[#30756] [Feature #3436] Spawn the timer thread lazily — Maximilian Gass <redmine@...>
Feature #3436: Spawn the timer thread lazily
Issue #3436 has been updated by Mark Somerville.
Hi,
(2010/10/08 15:12), Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 11:12:47PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 01:27:53AM +0900, Mark Somerville wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 02:21:41AM +0900, Mark Somerville wrote:
[#30799] PATCH: ENV['key'] = non_string — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Can I commit this please? This drives me bonkers.
Hi,
[#30821] [Bug #3454] Segfault with syscall — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #3454: Segfault with syscall
[#30855] requires in 1.9 are slower... — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hi all.
[#30882] Was 1.8.7-p299 announced here? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello, tried to look for the release notes or a link, just found the
[#30891] [Feature #3478] Excruciatingly slow pathname implementation — Stephen Touset <redmine@...>
Issue #3478 has been updated by Stephen Touset.
[#30913] String#rindex is faster with Regexps than with Strings? — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...>
hi,
[#30917] [Bug #3487] fiddle pushes arguments in a wrong format — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...>
Bug #3487: fiddle pushes arguments in a wrong format
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 08:36:45PM +0900, Yuki Sonoda wrote:
[#30927] undefined reference to 'rb_encdb_declare'; ruby-1.9.2-preview3 64-bit on Windows — Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist@...>
[cross-posted to rubyinstaller ML]
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist@mac.com> wrote:
[#30968] ironruby vs ruby — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
Matz,
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:25 AM, C.E. Thornton
Note that Antonio's benchmark compares 64bit IronRuby build against 32bit 1.8.7 MRI and thus favoring MRI.
[ruby-core:30978] Re: ironruby vs ruby
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Tomas Matousek <Tomas.Matousek@microsoft.com> wrote: > Note that Antonio's benchmark compares 64bit IronRuby build against 32bit 1.8.7 MRI and thus favoring MRI. > Our 32bit build is doing better simply due to the fact that pointers are half in size. > > We have adapted versions of some of Antonio's microbenchmarks in our depo that I use for IronRuby perf analysis. The results I get on the current build are below. > As you can see we are slower in some faster in others. We know the reasons and how to speed it up for most of them. We just haven't had time to do so yet. And keep in mind these are just microbenchmarks so they don't really reflect perf thruput of real apps. If you would like to see the exact source code let me know. > > C:\Temp>rbr -X:NoAdaptiveCompilation run.rb > ./bm_app_factorial.rb > 潦uby 1.9: 2.777/2.777 > 潛ronRuby: 1.342/1.326 -> 2.094x faster What version of Ruby 1.9 are you comparing against? 1.9.1, 1.9.2, mswin or mingw builds? -- Luis Lavena AREA 17 - Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but rather when there is nothing more to take away. Antoine de Saint-Exup駻y