[#30545] [Ann] Contribution wanted: identify tickets for 1.9.2 release — Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
Hi all --
[#30558] [Feature #3380] Minitest Runner Command — Thomas Sawyer <redmine@...>
Feature #3380: Minitest Runner Command
[#30592] [Bug #3392] Kernel.open Ignores :binmode Key in Opts Hash w.r.t Encoding — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #3392: Kernel.open Ignores :binmode Key in Opts Hash w.r.t Encoding
[#30602] The `open` Methods and Their Many Arguments — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...>
I'm documenting Kernel.open, and the related .open methods, for a book
[#30607] [Bug #3395] Ruby does not appear to build against openssl-1.0.0a — Rebecca Menessecc <redmine@...>
Bug #3395: Ruby does not appear to build against openssl-1.0.0a
[#30656] Promote RubyInstaller as better alternative in ruby-lang.org — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
[#30672] [Bug #3411] Time.local 1916,5,1 #=> 1916-04-30 23:00:00 +0100 — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>
Bug #3411: Time.local 1916,5,1 #=> 1916-04-30 23:00:00 +0100
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Benoit Daloze <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#30697] [Bug #3418] IO#putc Clobbers Multi-byte Characters — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #3418: IO#putc Clobbers Multi-byte Characters
[#30707] [Bug #3420] Module#method calling <=> causes SystemStackError — Florian Aßmann <redmine@...>
Bug #3420: Module#method calling <=> causes SystemStackError
[#30722] [Feature #3424] Source code interaction. [new ideas for ruby 2] — Eloy Esp <redmine@...>
Feature #3424: Source code interaction. [new ideas for ruby 2]
[#30734] [Bug #3428] ri outputs ansi escape sequences even when stdout is not a tty — caleb clausen <redmine@...>
Bug #3428: ri outputs ansi escape sequences even when stdout is not a tty
[#30756] [Feature #3436] Spawn the timer thread lazily — Maximilian Gass <redmine@...>
Feature #3436: Spawn the timer thread lazily
Issue #3436 has been updated by Mark Somerville.
Hi,
(2010/10/08 15:12), Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 11:12:47PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 01:27:53AM +0900, Mark Somerville wrote:
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 02:21:41AM +0900, Mark Somerville wrote:
[#30799] PATCH: ENV['key'] = non_string — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Can I commit this please? This drives me bonkers.
Hi,
[#30821] [Bug #3454] Segfault with syscall — Run Paint Run Run <redmine@...>
Bug #3454: Segfault with syscall
[#30855] requires in 1.9 are slower... — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hi all.
[#30882] Was 1.8.7-p299 announced here? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello, tried to look for the release notes or a link, just found the
[#30891] [Feature #3478] Excruciatingly slow pathname implementation — Stephen Touset <redmine@...>
Issue #3478 has been updated by Stephen Touset.
[#30913] String#rindex is faster with Regexps than with Strings? — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...>
hi,
[#30917] [Bug #3487] fiddle pushes arguments in a wrong format — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...>
Bug #3487: fiddle pushes arguments in a wrong format
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 08:36:45PM +0900, Yuki Sonoda wrote:
[#30927] undefined reference to 'rb_encdb_declare'; ruby-1.9.2-preview3 64-bit on Windows — Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist@...>
[cross-posted to rubyinstaller ML]
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist@mac.com> wrote:
[#30968] ironruby vs ruby — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
Matz,
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:25 AM, C.E. Thornton
Note that Antonio's benchmark compares 64bit IronRuby build against 32bit 1.8.7 MRI and thus favoring MRI.
[ruby-core:30858] Re: requires in 1.9 are slower...
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:47, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: > On 2010/06/22 17:14, Michael Fellinger wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Roger Pack<rogerdpack2@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I've noticed that with 1.9.x, requires seem to take a bit more than >>> twice the time they did with 1.8.6 >> Rubygems? > Before Rubygems, I would suspect the bytecode (or whatever it's called in > YARV) generation. And the fact that all IO in 1.9.[12] seems to be about twice as slow (or more) than in 1.8.[67]? (Mostly due to (unoptimized) encoding handling, I suppose.)