From: Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Date: 2010-06-30T23:46:03+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:30976] Re: ironruby vs ruby

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:25 AM, C.E. Thornton
<admin@hawthorne-press.com> wrote:
> Matz,
>
> �Information Week claims that IronRuby runs two
> to four times faster than the "main implementation"
> of Ruby ...
>
> �I would really like to know how those tests were run?

That sounds unreal.

Do you have a link to the article?

Antonio Cangiano latest shootout has proven IronRuby is still par to
1.8.7, and in some tests, even slower.

http://programmingzen.com/2010/06/28/the-great-ruby-shootout-windows-edition/

Please provide a link to the article.
-- 
Luis Lavena
AREA 17
-
Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add,
but rather when there is nothing more to take away.
Antoine de Saint-Exup�ry