[#20190] Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Evan Phoenix <evan@...>

Hi everyone,

79 messages 2008/12/01
[#20200] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/02

Hi,

[#20215] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/12/02

[#20217] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/12/02

[#20301] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/04

Hi,

[#20316] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/04

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#20317] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/12/04

On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 03:25:42AM +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#20323] Leave my open classes alone (was Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/12/04

[#20325] Re: Leave my open classes alone (was Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly) — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/04

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#20328] Re: Leave my open classes alone (was Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/04

Hi,

[#20334] Re: Leave my open classes alone (was Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly) — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/04

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#20384] Re: Leave my open classes alone (was Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly) — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2008/12/05

[#20329] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — daz <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2008/12/04

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#20335] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/04

daz wrote:

[#20341] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2008/12/04

On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:58:02 +1100, Charles Oliver Nutter

[#20344] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/05

Michael Selig wrote:

[#20214] Proposal: deferred blocks — "Yehuda Katz" <wycats@...>

Several people have played around with solutions that use ParseTree or

11 messages 2008/12/02

[#20235] autoload and concurrency — "Yehuda Katz" <wycats@...>

Merb uses autoload rather extensively. We have lately observed some

31 messages 2008/12/03
[#20236] Re: autoload and concurrency — Jim Deville <jdeville@...> 2008/12/03

This seems like a strong argument in favor of Ruby-core:20225.

[#20240] Re: autoload and concurrency — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/03

Jim Deville wrote:

[#20242] Re: autoload and concurrency — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/03

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#20245] Re: autoload and concurrency — "Yehuda Katz" <wycats@...> 2008/12/03

Also, this just illustrates that it's possible. In the case of Merb, we

[#20247] Re: autoload and concurrency — Tomas Matousek <Tomas.Matousek@...> 2008/12/03

I think it has already been concluded that autoload and require are inheren=

[#20241] [Bug #814] NoMethodError: undefined method `read_nonblock' for #<OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket:0x1a64f9a0> — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>

Bug #814: NoMethodError: undefined method `read_nonblock' for #<OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket:0x1a64f9a0>

19 messages 2008/12/03
[#22538] [Bug #814] NoMethodError: undefined method `read_nonblock' for #<OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket:0x1a64f9a0> — Tony Arcieri <redmine@...> 2009/02/26

Issue #814 has been updated by Tony Arcieri.

[#20416] [Feature #839] Add code on each line of a backtrace output to the screen — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Feature #839: Add code on each line of a backtrace output to the screen

12 messages 2008/12/08

[#20483] encoding of symbols — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

If I have a source file like this:

50 messages 2008/12/11
[#20494] Re: encoding of symbols — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/11

Hi,

[#20496] Re: encoding of symbols — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/12

Hi,

[#20522] Re: encoding of symbols — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/13

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#20526] Re: encoding of symbols — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2008/12/13

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 08:33:13PM +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#20540] Re: 1.9 character encoding (was: encoding of symbols) — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2008/12/14

On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 01:01:44 +1100, Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com>

[#20545] Re: 1.9 character encoding (was: encoding of symbols) — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2008/12/14

On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:57:55 +1100, Michael Selig

[#20562] Re: 1.9 character encoding (was: encoding of symbols) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/15

Hi,

[#20619] Re: 1.9 character encoding (was: encoding of symbols) — danielcavanagh@... 2008/12/17

> You're right. When we have two strings with identical byte sequence

[#20502] [Bug #863] Openssl issues with fresh compile on Ubuntu — Brian Takita <redmine@...>

Bug #863: Openssl issues with fresh compile on Ubuntu

11 messages 2008/12/12

[#20557] [Bug #877] [win32] Ruby Standard Library (maybe smth else): Wrong Encoding in Files, Directories and Environment Variables — "Dmitry A. Ustalov" <redmine@...>

Bug #877: [win32] Ruby Standard Library (maybe smth else): Wrong Encoding in Files, Directories and Environment Variables

14 messages 2008/12/14

[#20564] [Bug #883] Failure: test_handle_special_CROSSREF_no_underscore(TestRDocMarkupToHtmlCrossref) — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...>

Bug #883: Failure: test_handle_special_CROSSREF_no_underscore(TestRDocMarkupToHtmlCrossref)

9 messages 2008/12/15

[#20576] [Bug #888] zlib 1.2.3 does not work with Rubygems 1.3.1 (in Ruby 1.9.1) on Windows — Chauk-Mean PROUM <redmine@...>

Bug #888: zlib 1.2.3 does not work with Rubygems 1.3.1 (in Ruby 1.9.1) on Windows

14 messages 2008/12/15

[#20578] [Feature #889] erb.rb should use Array and << for eoutvar and not String and concat — Thomas Enebo <redmine@...>

Feature #889: erb.rb should use Array and << for eoutvar and not String and concat

15 messages 2008/12/15

[#20668] [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>

Feature #905: Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer

60 messages 2008/12/18
[#20671] Re: [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/19

Hi

[#20674] Re: [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/19

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#20697] Re: [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/12/19

[#20703] Re: [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/19

Jim Weirich wrote:

[#20704] Re: [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/12/19

[#28461] [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/03/04

Issue #905 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#28491] [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2010/03/05

Issue #905 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.

[#20695] [Bug #907] Various system() and backticks problems on Windows — "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@...>

Bug #907: Various system() and backticks problems on Windows

13 messages 2008/12/19

[#20706] [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Michael Selig <redmine@...>

Feature #908: Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream

39 messages 2008/12/19
[#21816] [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Michael Selig <redmine@...> 2009/02/03

Issue #908 has been updated by Michael Selig.

[#21825] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/02/04

In article <4988d2fa997f8_8527a9e32018e7@redmine.ruby-lang.org>,

[#21826] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2009/02/04

Hi,

[#22100] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/02/14

In article <op.uotab6oa9245dp@kool>,

[#22125] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2009/02/15

2009/2/14 Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org>:

[#22146] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/02/15

In article <a5d587fb0902141711q780f0d24jef9be9b8bbe69b2a@mail.gmail.com>,

[#22182] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2009/02/16

2009/2/15 Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org>:

[#22213] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/02/18

In article <a5d587fb0902160252u56b50cfdv8e0fd36bb4f0b1b3@mail.gmail.com>,

[#22215] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2009/02/18

2009/2/18 Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org>:

[#22238] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2009/02/18

On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:21:21 +1100, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz>

[#22253] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/02/19

In article <op.upklh9q19245dp@kool>,

[#22281] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2009/02/20

At 19:00 09/02/19, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#22332] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/02/22

In article <6.0.0.20.2.20090220134502.0823ee98@localhost>,

[#22338] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2009/02/22

On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 03:00:41 +1100, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:

[#22356] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2009/02/23

2009/2/22 Michael Selig <michael.selig@fs.com.au>:

[#20723] [Bug #911] ArgumentError in Resolv#getaddress — Federico Builes <redmine@...>

Bug #911: ArgumentError in Resolv#getaddress

14 messages 2008/12/20

[#20797] [Bug #921] autoload is not thread-safe — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>

Bug #921: autoload is not thread-safe

15 messages 2008/12/22

[#20893] [Bug #932] incorrect case statement in "ext/dl/test/test_base.rb" causes library problems on openSUSE 11.1 64-bit — Ed Borasky <redmine@...>

Bug #932: incorrect case statement in "ext/dl/test/test_base.rb" causes library problems on openSUSE 11.1 64-bit

8 messages 2008/12/26

[#20978] Definable != is a Bad Thing™ — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

> >> class X; def == o; :great; end; def != o; :horrible; end; end

20 messages 2008/12/30
[#20979] Re: Definable != is a Bad Thing™ — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/30

Hi,

[#20994] [Bug #956] Encoding: nl_langinfo(CODESET) on cygwin 1.5 always returns US-ASCII — Tom Link <redmine@...>

Bug #956: Encoding: nl_langinfo(CODESET) on cygwin 1.5 always returns US-ASCII

10 messages 2008/12/30

[#20999] Supporting Thread.critical=with native threads — Shri Borde <Shri.Borde@...>

Hi,

27 messages 2008/12/30
[#21002] Re: Supporting Thread.critical=with native threads — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/12/31

On Dec 30, 2008, at 15:00 PM, Shri Borde wrote:

[#21010] Re: Supporting Thread.critical=with native threads — Shri Borde <Shri.Borde@...> 2008/12/31

http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Thread.html#M000461 says:

[#21245] Re: Supporting Thread.critical=with native threads — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/01/10

I'm starting come around to Shri's idea of critical= being represented

[#21353] Re: Supporting Thread.critical=with native threads — Shri Borde <Shri.Borde@...> 2009/01/14

SXMgb3BlbmluZyBhIGJ1ZyB0aGUgcmVjb21tZW5kZWQgd2F5IHRvIGdldCB0aGUgc3BlYyBjaGFu

[#21359] Re: Supporting Thread.critical=with native threads — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/01/15

[ruby-core:20940] [Bug #633] dl segfaults on x86_64-linux systems

From: Ed Borasky <redmine@...>
Date: 2008-12-28 18:03:37 UTC
List: ruby-core #20940
Issue #633 has been updated by Ed Borasky.


I'm still seeing a segfault in r21112:

which ruby
/home/znmeb/test/bin/ruby
ruby --version
ruby 1.9.1 (2008-12-28 patchlevel-5000 trunk 21112) [x86_64-linux]
cd ruby/ext/dl/test/
ruby test_all.rb 2>&1 | tee ~/Packages/ruby-segfault.log
Loaded suite test_all
Started
...........F./home/znmeb/test/lib/ruby/1.9.1/dl/func.rb:31: [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.9.1 (2008-12-28 patchlevel-5000 trunk 21112) [x86_64-linux]

-- control frame ----------
c:0015 p:---- s:0063 b:0063 l:000062 d:000062 CFUNC  :call
c:0014 p:0053 s:0059 b:0059 l:000058 d:000058 METHOD /home/znmeb/test/lib/ruby/1.9.1/dl/func.rb:31
c:0013 p:0073 s:0052 b:0052 l:000051 d:000051 METHOD /home/znmeb/Packages/ruby/ext/dl/test/test_func.rb:18
c:0012 p:0041 s:0045 b:0045 l:000044 d:000044 METHOD /home/znmeb/test/lib/ruby/1.9.1/minitest/unit.rb:436
c:0011 p:0096 s:0039 b:0039 l:000019 d:000038 BLOCK  /home/znmeb/test/lib/ruby/1.9.1/minitest/unit.rb:415
c:0010 p:---- s:0033 b:0033 l:000032 d:000032 FINISH
c:0009 p:---- s:0031 b:0031 l:000030 d:000030 CFUNC  :each
c:0008 p:0026 s:0028 b:0028 l:000019 d:000027 BLOCK  /home/znmeb/test/lib/ruby/1.9.1/minitest/unit.rb:409
c:0007 p:---- s:0025 b:0025 l:000024 d:000024 FINISH
c:0006 p:---- s:0023 b:0023 l:000022 d:000022 CFUNC  :each
c:0005 p:0080 s:0020 b:0020 l:000019 d:000019 METHOD /home/znmeb/test/lib/ruby/1.9.1/minitest/unit.rb:408
c:0004 p:0153 s:0015 b:0015 l:000014 d:000014 METHOD /home/znmeb/test/lib/ruby/1.9.1/minitest/unit.rb:388
c:0003 p:0040 s:0007 b:0007 l:000dd8 d:000006 BLOCK  /home/znmeb/test/lib/ruby/1.9.1/minitest/unit.rb:329
c:0002 p:---- s:0004 b:0004 l:000003 d:000003 FINISH
c:0001 p:0000 s:0002 b:0002 l:000bc8 d:000bc8 TOP   
---------------------------
-- Ruby level backtrace information-----------------------------------------
/home/znmeb/test/lib/ruby/1.9.1/dl/func.rb:31:in `call'
/home/znmeb/test/lib/ruby/1.9.1/dl/func.rb:31:in `call'
/home/znmeb/Packages/ruby/ext/dl/test/test_func.rb:18:in `test_isdigit'
/home/znmeb/test/lib/ruby/1.9.1/minitest/unit.rb:436:in `run'
/home/znmeb/test/lib/ruby/1.9.1/minitest/unit.rb:415:in `block (2 levels) in run_test_suites'
/home/znmeb/test/lib/ruby/1.9.1/minitest/unit.rb:409:in `each'
/home/znmeb/test/lib/ruby/1.9.1/minitest/unit.rb:409:in `block in run_test_suites'
/home/znmeb/test/lib/ruby/1.9.1/minitest/unit.rb:408:in `each'
/home/znmeb/test/lib/ruby/1.9.1/minitest/unit.rb:408:in `run_test_suites'
/home/znmeb/test/lib/ruby/1.9.1/minitest/unit.rb:388:in `run'
/home/znmeb/test/lib/ruby/1.9.1/minitest/unit.rb:329:in `block in autorun'

-- C level backtrace information -------------------------------------------
0x51ba89 ruby(rb_vm_bugreport+0x179) [0x51ba89]
0x54fb3a ruby [0x54fb3a]
0x54fc47 ruby(rb_bug+0xf1) [0x54fc47]
0x4af46b ruby [0x4af46b]
0x7f9499593a90 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 [0x7f9499593a90]
0x7f94989b75fe /lib64/libc.so.6(isdigit+0x1e) [0x7f94989b75fe]
0x7f94982d0fc3 /home/znmeb/test/lib/ruby/1.9.1/x86_64-linux/dl.so(rb_dlcfunc_call+0x3fb8) [0x7f94982d0fc3]
0x5104a5 ruby [0x5104a5]
0x5102cc ruby [0x5102cc]
0x50fa9e ruby [0x50fa9e]
0x50b382 ruby [0x50b382]
0x5186b9 ruby [0x5186b9]
0x5173f7 ruby [0x5173f7]
0x51747e ruby [0x51747e]
0x51452c ruby [0x51452c]
0x5144fd ruby(rb_yield+0x39) [0x5144fd]
0x52c46b ruby(rb_ary_each+0x8a) [0x52c46b]
0x510486 ruby [0x510486]
0x5102cc ruby [0x5102cc]
0x50fa9e ruby [0x50fa9e]
0x50b382 ruby [0x50b382]
0x5186b9 ruby [0x5186b9]
0x5173f7 ruby [0x5173f7]
0x51747e ruby [0x51747e]
0x51452c ruby [0x51452c]
0x5144fd ruby(rb_yield+0x39) [0x5144fd]
0x52c46b ruby(rb_ary_each+0x8a) [0x52c46b]
0x510486 ruby [0x510486]
0x5102cc ruby [0x5102cc]
0x50fa9e ruby [0x50fa9e]
0x50b382 ruby [0x50b382]
0x5186b9 ruby [0x5186b9]
0x5173f7 ruby [0x5173f7]
0x51758c ruby(vm_invoke_proc+0x10c) [0x51758c]
0x41de07 ruby(rb_proc_call+0x9f) [0x41de07]
0x41ac69 ruby(rb_call_end_proc+0x1d) [0x41ac69]
0x41af8c ruby(rb_exec_end_proc+0x1b3) [0x41af8c]
0x41b24f ruby [0x41b24f]
0x41b33a ruby(ruby_cleanup+0xaf) [0x41b33a]
0x41b670 ruby(ruby_run_node+0x73) [0x41b670]
0x419e7b ruby(main+0x4f) [0x419e7b]
0x7f94989aa586 /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe6) [0x7f94989aa586]
0x419d69 ruby [0x419d69]

[NOTE]
You may encounter a bug of Ruby interpreter. Bug reports are welcome.
For details: http://www.ruby-lang.org/bugreport.html

cd ~/Packages
znmeb@DreamScape:~/Packages> 


I'll do a C-level backtrace and see if it's in the same place.
----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/633

----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread