[ruby-core:21208] Re: Definable != is a Bad Thing???

Kornelius Kalnbach wrote:
> Daniel Luz wrote:
>> What I personally don't like about this is that it gives you a false
>> sense of control. We still can't handle && and ||
> the problem is short-circuit evaluation, I guess. this one should not
> run the command:
> 
>   false && `rm -rf .`
> 
> it has to be part of the AST, and can't be changed at runtime. AFAIK,
> you can't translate "a && b" into a method call in Ruby. they are more
> like "and" and "or". the ternary operator (cond ? truecase : falsecase)
> is another example - which is a shortcut for if-then-else. and you don't
> want to redefine that ^^

I was bored, so I went ahead and implemented it: 
<https://JoergWMittag.GitHub.Com/b001e/>.

There is actually absolutely nothing original or hard about this: I 
took the API straight from Smalltalk, the implementation dates all the 
way back to Lisp and the specs were pretty much cut&pasted from the 
RubySpec project.

On the subject of RubySpec: all specs still pass, with the exception 
of the ones that deal with operator precedence, of course.

This is pretty much the gist of the implementation:

	class FalseClass
	  def if; end
	  def ifelse _ = nil, else_branch = ->() {}
	    else_branch.call
	  end
	  def and; self end
	  def or; yield end
	  def not; true end
	end
	class TrueClass
	  def if
	    yield if block_given?
	  end
	  def ifelse then_branch = ->() {}, _ = nil
	    then_branch.call
	  end
	  def and; yield end
	  def or; self end
	  def not; false end
	end

Straight from the README:

B001e - A message-sending based re-implementation of Boolean operators 
in pure Ruby.

Abstract
--------

B001e is a message-sending based re-implementation of the Boolean 
operators 'and', 'or' and 'not' and the Boolean expressions 'if' and 
'unless' in pure Ruby. Lazy Evaluation / Short-circuiting is achieved 
through the use of blocks and lambda expressions.

What
====

This library contains sample re-implementations of the Boolean 
operators 'and', 'or' and 'not' and the Boolean expressions 'if' and 
'unless', in pure Ruby. The style is heavily inspired by Smalltalk and 
its relatives: the operators become messages that take block 
parameters and are sent to the conditionals.

Operator / keyword style:

	if c1 && c2
	  t
	elsif c3
	  ei
	else
	  e
	end

becomes:

	c1.and { c2 }.ifelse ->() { t }, ->() { c3.ifelse ->() { ei }, ->() { e } }

How
===

All the operators become methods. The logic is achieved through 
polymorphism: basically, 'NilClass' and 'FalseClass' get one set of 
implementations, 'Object' gets the opposite set.

Lazy Evaluation is achieved with blocks: if a block is not supposed to 
be evaluated, it is simply never 'yield'ed to.

Where
=====

At GitHub <https://GitHub.Com/JoergWMittag/B001e/>, of course!

Installation
============

	gem install JoergWMittag-b001e

Usage
=====

	begin require 'rubygems'; rescue LoadError
	else begin gem 'JoergWMittag-b001e', '~> 0.0.1'; rescue Gem::LoadError; end end
	require 'b001e'

	true.and { nil.or { 42 } }.if { puts "It's true!" }
	# Equivalent to: if true && (nil || 42) then puts "It's true!" end

	false.ifelse ->() { puts "You'll never see this." }, ->() { puts 'But this!' }
	# Equivalent to: if false then puts "You'll never see this." else
puts 'But this!' end

Acknowledgements
================

Style
-----

The API style is heavily influenced by Smalltalk.

Implementation
--------------

The implementation is literally textbook: every introductory CS text 
should have it.

Specs
-----

The Specs were directly lifted from the RubySpec project.

License
=======

My original work is licensed under the MIT X11 License.

The RubySpec license is also MIT X11.

Greetings, 
    jwm.