[#20190] Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Evan Phoenix <evan@...>

Hi everyone,

79 messages 2008/12/01
[#20200] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/02

Hi,

[#20215] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/12/02

[#20217] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/12/02

[#20301] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/04

Hi,

[#20316] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/04

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#20317] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/12/04

On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 03:25:42AM +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#20323] Leave my open classes alone (was Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/12/04

[#20325] Re: Leave my open classes alone (was Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly) — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/04

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#20328] Re: Leave my open classes alone (was Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/04

Hi,

[#20334] Re: Leave my open classes alone (was Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly) — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/04

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#20384] Re: Leave my open classes alone (was Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly) — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2008/12/05

[#20329] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — daz <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2008/12/04

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#20335] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/04

daz wrote:

[#20341] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2008/12/04

On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:58:02 +1100, Charles Oliver Nutter

[#20344] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/05

Michael Selig wrote:

[#20214] Proposal: deferred blocks — "Yehuda Katz" <wycats@...>

Several people have played around with solutions that use ParseTree or

11 messages 2008/12/02

[#20235] autoload and concurrency — "Yehuda Katz" <wycats@...>

Merb uses autoload rather extensively. We have lately observed some

31 messages 2008/12/03
[#20236] Re: autoload and concurrency — Jim Deville <jdeville@...> 2008/12/03

This seems like a strong argument in favor of Ruby-core:20225.

[#20240] Re: autoload and concurrency — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/03

Jim Deville wrote:

[#20242] Re: autoload and concurrency — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/03

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#20245] Re: autoload and concurrency — "Yehuda Katz" <wycats@...> 2008/12/03

Also, this just illustrates that it's possible. In the case of Merb, we

[#20247] Re: autoload and concurrency — Tomas Matousek <Tomas.Matousek@...> 2008/12/03

I think it has already been concluded that autoload and require are inheren=

[#20241] [Bug #814] NoMethodError: undefined method `read_nonblock' for #<OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket:0x1a64f9a0> — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>

Bug #814: NoMethodError: undefined method `read_nonblock' for #<OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket:0x1a64f9a0>

19 messages 2008/12/03
[#22538] [Bug #814] NoMethodError: undefined method `read_nonblock' for #<OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket:0x1a64f9a0> — Tony Arcieri <redmine@...> 2009/02/26

Issue #814 has been updated by Tony Arcieri.

[#20416] [Feature #839] Add code on each line of a backtrace output to the screen — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Feature #839: Add code on each line of a backtrace output to the screen

12 messages 2008/12/08

[#20483] encoding of symbols — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

If I have a source file like this:

50 messages 2008/12/11
[#20494] Re: encoding of symbols — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/11

Hi,

[#20496] Re: encoding of symbols — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/12

Hi,

[#20522] Re: encoding of symbols — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/13

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#20526] Re: encoding of symbols — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2008/12/13

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 08:33:13PM +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#20540] Re: 1.9 character encoding (was: encoding of symbols) — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2008/12/14

On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 01:01:44 +1100, Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com>

[#20545] Re: 1.9 character encoding (was: encoding of symbols) — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2008/12/14

On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:57:55 +1100, Michael Selig

[#20562] Re: 1.9 character encoding (was: encoding of symbols) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/15

Hi,

[#20619] Re: 1.9 character encoding (was: encoding of symbols) — danielcavanagh@... 2008/12/17

> You're right. When we have two strings with identical byte sequence

[#20502] [Bug #863] Openssl issues with fresh compile on Ubuntu — Brian Takita <redmine@...>

Bug #863: Openssl issues with fresh compile on Ubuntu

11 messages 2008/12/12

[#20557] [Bug #877] [win32] Ruby Standard Library (maybe smth else): Wrong Encoding in Files, Directories and Environment Variables — "Dmitry A. Ustalov" <redmine@...>

Bug #877: [win32] Ruby Standard Library (maybe smth else): Wrong Encoding in Files, Directories and Environment Variables

14 messages 2008/12/14

[#20564] [Bug #883] Failure: test_handle_special_CROSSREF_no_underscore(TestRDocMarkupToHtmlCrossref) — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...>

Bug #883: Failure: test_handle_special_CROSSREF_no_underscore(TestRDocMarkupToHtmlCrossref)

9 messages 2008/12/15

[#20576] [Bug #888] zlib 1.2.3 does not work with Rubygems 1.3.1 (in Ruby 1.9.1) on Windows — Chauk-Mean PROUM <redmine@...>

Bug #888: zlib 1.2.3 does not work with Rubygems 1.3.1 (in Ruby 1.9.1) on Windows

14 messages 2008/12/15

[#20578] [Feature #889] erb.rb should use Array and << for eoutvar and not String and concat — Thomas Enebo <redmine@...>

Feature #889: erb.rb should use Array and << for eoutvar and not String and concat

15 messages 2008/12/15

[#20668] [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>

Feature #905: Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer

60 messages 2008/12/18
[#20671] Re: [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/19

Hi

[#20674] Re: [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/19

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#20697] Re: [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/12/19

[#20703] Re: [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/19

Jim Weirich wrote:

[#20704] Re: [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/12/19

[#28461] [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/03/04

Issue #905 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#28491] [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2010/03/05

Issue #905 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.

[#20695] [Bug #907] Various system() and backticks problems on Windows — "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@...>

Bug #907: Various system() and backticks problems on Windows

13 messages 2008/12/19

[#20706] [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Michael Selig <redmine@...>

Feature #908: Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream

39 messages 2008/12/19
[#21816] [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Michael Selig <redmine@...> 2009/02/03

Issue #908 has been updated by Michael Selig.

[#21825] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/02/04

In article <4988d2fa997f8_8527a9e32018e7@redmine.ruby-lang.org>,

[#21826] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2009/02/04

Hi,

[#22100] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/02/14

In article <op.uotab6oa9245dp@kool>,

[#22125] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2009/02/15

2009/2/14 Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org>:

[#22146] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/02/15

In article <a5d587fb0902141711q780f0d24jef9be9b8bbe69b2a@mail.gmail.com>,

[#22182] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2009/02/16

2009/2/15 Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org>:

[#22213] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/02/18

In article <a5d587fb0902160252u56b50cfdv8e0fd36bb4f0b1b3@mail.gmail.com>,

[#22215] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2009/02/18

2009/2/18 Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org>:

[#22238] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2009/02/18

On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:21:21 +1100, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz>

[#22253] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/02/19

In article <op.upklh9q19245dp@kool>,

[#22281] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2009/02/20

At 19:00 09/02/19, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#22332] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/02/22

In article <6.0.0.20.2.20090220134502.0823ee98@localhost>,

[#22338] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2009/02/22

On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 03:00:41 +1100, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:

[#22356] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2009/02/23

2009/2/22 Michael Selig <michael.selig@fs.com.au>:

[#20723] [Bug #911] ArgumentError in Resolv#getaddress — Federico Builes <redmine@...>

Bug #911: ArgumentError in Resolv#getaddress

14 messages 2008/12/20

[#20797] [Bug #921] autoload is not thread-safe — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>

Bug #921: autoload is not thread-safe

15 messages 2008/12/22

[#20893] [Bug #932] incorrect case statement in "ext/dl/test/test_base.rb" causes library problems on openSUSE 11.1 64-bit — Ed Borasky <redmine@...>

Bug #932: incorrect case statement in "ext/dl/test/test_base.rb" causes library problems on openSUSE 11.1 64-bit

8 messages 2008/12/26

[#20978] Definable != is a Bad Thing™ — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

> >> class X; def == o; :great; end; def != o; :horrible; end; end

20 messages 2008/12/30
[#20979] Re: Definable != is a Bad Thing™ — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/30

Hi,

[#20994] [Bug #956] Encoding: nl_langinfo(CODESET) on cygwin 1.5 always returns US-ASCII — Tom Link <redmine@...>

Bug #956: Encoding: nl_langinfo(CODESET) on cygwin 1.5 always returns US-ASCII

10 messages 2008/12/30

[#20999] Supporting Thread.critical=with native threads — Shri Borde <Shri.Borde@...>

Hi,

27 messages 2008/12/30
[#21002] Re: Supporting Thread.critical=with native threads — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/12/31

On Dec 30, 2008, at 15:00 PM, Shri Borde wrote:

[#21010] Re: Supporting Thread.critical=with native threads — Shri Borde <Shri.Borde@...> 2008/12/31

http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Thread.html#M000461 says:

[#21245] Re: Supporting Thread.critical=with native threads — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/01/10

I'm starting come around to Shri's idea of critical= being represented

[#21353] Re: Supporting Thread.critical=with native threads — Shri Borde <Shri.Borde@...> 2009/01/14

SXMgb3BlbmluZyBhIGJ1ZyB0aGUgcmVjb21tZW5kZWQgd2F5IHRvIGdldCB0aGUgc3BlYyBjaGFu

[#21359] Re: Supporting Thread.critical=with native threads — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/01/15

[ruby-core:20794] [Bug #920] require is not thread-safe

From: Charles Nutter <redmine@...>
Date: 2008-12-22 16:50:51 UTC
List: ruby-core #20794
Bug #920: require is not thread-safe
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/920

Author: Charles Nutter
Status: Open, Priority: Normal

Currently, two threads requiring the same file may see many different results. In some versions, the second thread will immediately return false, whether the require has completed or not. In other versions, the second thread will start its own load of the file in question, possibly redefining classes, modules, constants, and reinstantiating singletons. In some recent versions of 1.9, the second thread will block. We need a consistent fix for this across all production-ready Ruby versions.

If we agree that no require call should cause a given file to load twice, we have a few options:

* Modify all require implementations to immediately return false if the requested resource has already been loaded or is in the process of being loaded. This does not guarantee the file has *completed* loading, but would ensure we do not double-initialize anything in a required file. Along with this, we would simply advise all developers to avoid concurrent requires
* Modify all require implementations to use a global lock, disallowing concurrent requires entirely. This means required files must be well-behaved; they can't start up new threads that do requires or perform long-running tasks. It would fix the concurrency problem entirely and requires from multiple threads would simply happen in serial.

Both of these require behavioral changes in at least some Ruby versions, with the latter requiring the most drastic changes (since concurrent requires will no longer run in parallel, as they do now, even if no common resources are in contention).

A third option, having a per-resource lock, is infeasible due to the strong possibility of deadlocks. If two threads require separate files with circular dependencies, deadlock is almost assured. If this mechanism has been implemented in any versions of Ruby, it should be replaced with either of the two solutions above.


----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next