[#28561] Ruby::DL vs Ruby::FFI — Aston <blackapache512-ticket@...>

Ruby.DL and FFI libraries are great for programmers like me who are not internet programmers, but are more interested in scientific and number processing etc.

11 messages 2010/03/08

[#28686] trunk (26947) build fail with msys/mingw/vista — Jon <jon.forums@...>

I get the following build failure when msysgit's "c:\git\cmd" dir is on PATH.

8 messages 2010/03/16

[#28687] [Bug #2973] rb_bug - Segmentation fault - error.c:213 — rudolf gavlas <redmine@...>

Bug #2973: rb_bug - Segmentation fault - error.c:213

10 messages 2010/03/16

[#28735] [Bug #2982] Ruby tries to link with both openssl and readline — Lucas Nussbaum <redmine@...>

Bug #2982: Ruby tries to link with both openssl and readline

16 messages 2010/03/18

[#28736] [Bug #2983] Ruby (GPLv2 only) tries to link to with readline (now GPLv3) — Lucas Nussbaum <redmine@...>

Bug #2983: Ruby (GPLv2 only) tries to link to with readline (now GPLv3)

10 messages 2010/03/18

[#28907] [Bug #3000] Open SSL Segfaults — Christian Höltje <redmine@...>

Bug #3000: Open SSL Segfaults

19 messages 2010/03/23

[#28924] [Bug #3005] Ruby core dump - [BUG] rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0 — Sebastian YEPES <redmine@...>

Bug #3005: Ruby core dump - [BUG] rb_sys_fail() - errno == 0

10 messages 2010/03/24

[#28954] [Feature #3010] slow require gems in ruby 1.9.1 — Miao Jiang <redmine@...>

Feature #3010: slow require gems in ruby 1.9.1

15 messages 2010/03/24

[#29179] [Bug #3071] Convert rubygems and rdoc to use psych — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>

Bug #3071: Convert rubygems and rdoc to use psych

10 messages 2010/03/31

[ruby-core:28515] Re: [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer

From: Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
Date: 2010-03-05 17:25:02 UTC
List: ruby-core #28515
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 17:25, Caleb Clausen <vikkous@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/5/10, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:
>> 2010/3/5 Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@rubychan.de>:

>>> How big would the buffer size have to be for this template?
>>>
>>>  <p><%= link_to @record.name, @record %></p>

>> Yes, it is generally difficult to determine the size.
>>
>> We may be able to estimate it by using domain knowledge in some cases.
>> (e.g., certain page size is empirically known as about 10KB, etc.)
>> But if the expectation is disappointed, it will cause wasteful memory
>> allocation or no speed up.

> Generally, a given template should expand to about the same size every
> time.

I’m getting the feeling thath the only real use case that we’ve got
for this so far is ERb.  Wouldn’t it make more sense to change the way
ERb (and similar “string concatenators”) creates its result?

In This Thread