[#20190] Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Evan Phoenix <evan@...>

Hi everyone,

79 messages 2008/12/01
[#20200] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/02

Hi,

[#20215] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/12/02

[#20217] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/12/02

[#20301] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/04

Hi,

[#20316] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/04

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#20317] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/12/04

On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 03:25:42AM +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#20323] Leave my open classes alone (was Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/12/04

[#20325] Re: Leave my open classes alone (was Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly) — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/04

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#20328] Re: Leave my open classes alone (was Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/04

Hi,

[#20334] Re: Leave my open classes alone (was Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly) — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/04

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#20384] Re: Leave my open classes alone (was Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly) — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2008/12/05

[#20329] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — daz <dooby@...10.karoo.co.uk> 2008/12/04

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#20335] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/04

daz wrote:

[#20341] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2008/12/04

On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:58:02 +1100, Charles Oliver Nutter

[#20344] Re: Behavior: autoload calls rb_require() directly — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/05

Michael Selig wrote:

[#20214] Proposal: deferred blocks — "Yehuda Katz" <wycats@...>

Several people have played around with solutions that use ParseTree or

11 messages 2008/12/02

[#20235] autoload and concurrency — "Yehuda Katz" <wycats@...>

Merb uses autoload rather extensively. We have lately observed some

31 messages 2008/12/03
[#20236] Re: autoload and concurrency — Jim Deville <jdeville@...> 2008/12/03

This seems like a strong argument in favor of Ruby-core:20225.

[#20240] Re: autoload and concurrency — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/03

Jim Deville wrote:

[#20242] Re: autoload and concurrency — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/03

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#20245] Re: autoload and concurrency — "Yehuda Katz" <wycats@...> 2008/12/03

Also, this just illustrates that it's possible. In the case of Merb, we

[#20247] Re: autoload and concurrency — Tomas Matousek <Tomas.Matousek@...> 2008/12/03

I think it has already been concluded that autoload and require are inheren=

[#20241] [Bug #814] NoMethodError: undefined method `read_nonblock' for #<OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket:0x1a64f9a0> — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>

Bug #814: NoMethodError: undefined method `read_nonblock' for #<OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket:0x1a64f9a0>

19 messages 2008/12/03
[#22538] [Bug #814] NoMethodError: undefined method `read_nonblock' for #<OpenSSL::SSL::SSLSocket:0x1a64f9a0> — Tony Arcieri <redmine@...> 2009/02/26

Issue #814 has been updated by Tony Arcieri.

[#20416] [Feature #839] Add code on each line of a backtrace output to the screen — Roger Pack <redmine@...>

Feature #839: Add code on each line of a backtrace output to the screen

12 messages 2008/12/08

[#20483] encoding of symbols — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

If I have a source file like this:

50 messages 2008/12/11
[#20494] Re: encoding of symbols — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/11

Hi,

[#20496] Re: encoding of symbols — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/12

Hi,

[#20522] Re: encoding of symbols — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/13

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#20526] Re: encoding of symbols — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2008/12/13

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 08:33:13PM +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:

[#20540] Re: 1.9 character encoding (was: encoding of symbols) — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2008/12/14

On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 01:01:44 +1100, Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com>

[#20545] Re: 1.9 character encoding (was: encoding of symbols) — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2008/12/14

On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 11:57:55 +1100, Michael Selig

[#20562] Re: 1.9 character encoding (was: encoding of symbols) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/15

Hi,

[#20619] Re: 1.9 character encoding (was: encoding of symbols) — danielcavanagh@... 2008/12/17

> You're right. When we have two strings with identical byte sequence

[#20502] [Bug #863] Openssl issues with fresh compile on Ubuntu — Brian Takita <redmine@...>

Bug #863: Openssl issues with fresh compile on Ubuntu

11 messages 2008/12/12

[#20557] [Bug #877] [win32] Ruby Standard Library (maybe smth else): Wrong Encoding in Files, Directories and Environment Variables — "Dmitry A. Ustalov" <redmine@...>

Bug #877: [win32] Ruby Standard Library (maybe smth else): Wrong Encoding in Files, Directories and Environment Variables

14 messages 2008/12/14

[#20564] [Bug #883] Failure: test_handle_special_CROSSREF_no_underscore(TestRDocMarkupToHtmlCrossref) — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...>

Bug #883: Failure: test_handle_special_CROSSREF_no_underscore(TestRDocMarkupToHtmlCrossref)

9 messages 2008/12/15

[#20576] [Bug #888] zlib 1.2.3 does not work with Rubygems 1.3.1 (in Ruby 1.9.1) on Windows — Chauk-Mean PROUM <redmine@...>

Bug #888: zlib 1.2.3 does not work with Rubygems 1.3.1 (in Ruby 1.9.1) on Windows

14 messages 2008/12/15

[#20578] [Feature #889] erb.rb should use Array and << for eoutvar and not String and concat — Thomas Enebo <redmine@...>

Feature #889: erb.rb should use Array and << for eoutvar and not String and concat

15 messages 2008/12/15

[#20668] [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>

Feature #905: Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer

60 messages 2008/12/18
[#20671] Re: [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/19

Hi

[#20674] Re: [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/19

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#20697] Re: [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/12/19

[#20703] Re: [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/12/19

Jim Weirich wrote:

[#20704] Re: [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/12/19

[#28461] [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — caleb clausen <redmine@...> 2010/03/04

Issue #905 has been updated by caleb clausen.

[#28491] [Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — Kurt Stephens <redmine@...> 2010/03/05

Issue #905 has been updated by Kurt Stephens.

[#20695] [Bug #907] Various system() and backticks problems on Windows — "James M. Lawrence" <redmine@...>

Bug #907: Various system() and backticks problems on Windows

13 messages 2008/12/19

[#20706] [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Michael Selig <redmine@...>

Feature #908: Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream

39 messages 2008/12/19
[#21816] [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Michael Selig <redmine@...> 2009/02/03

Issue #908 has been updated by Michael Selig.

[#21825] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/02/04

In article <4988d2fa997f8_8527a9e32018e7@redmine.ruby-lang.org>,

[#21826] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2009/02/04

Hi,

[#22100] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/02/14

In article <op.uotab6oa9245dp@kool>,

[#22125] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2009/02/15

2009/2/14 Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org>:

[#22146] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/02/15

In article <a5d587fb0902141711q780f0d24jef9be9b8bbe69b2a@mail.gmail.com>,

[#22182] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2009/02/16

2009/2/15 Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org>:

[#22213] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/02/18

In article <a5d587fb0902160252u56b50cfdv8e0fd36bb4f0b1b3@mail.gmail.com>,

[#22215] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2009/02/18

2009/2/18 Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org>:

[#22238] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2009/02/18

On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:21:21 +1100, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz>

[#22253] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/02/19

In article <op.upklh9q19245dp@kool>,

[#22281] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2009/02/20

At 19:00 09/02/19, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#22332] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2009/02/22

In article <6.0.0.20.2.20090220134502.0823ee98@localhost>,

[#22338] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2009/02/22

On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 03:00:41 +1100, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:

[#22356] Re: [Feature #908] Should be an easy way of reading N characters from am I/O stream — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...> 2009/02/23

2009/2/22 Michael Selig <michael.selig@fs.com.au>:

[#20723] [Bug #911] ArgumentError in Resolv#getaddress — Federico Builes <redmine@...>

Bug #911: ArgumentError in Resolv#getaddress

14 messages 2008/12/20

[#20797] [Bug #921] autoload is not thread-safe — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>

Bug #921: autoload is not thread-safe

15 messages 2008/12/22

[#20893] [Bug #932] incorrect case statement in "ext/dl/test/test_base.rb" causes library problems on openSUSE 11.1 64-bit — Ed Borasky <redmine@...>

Bug #932: incorrect case statement in "ext/dl/test/test_base.rb" causes library problems on openSUSE 11.1 64-bit

8 messages 2008/12/26

[#20978] Definable != is a Bad Thing™ — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

> >> class X; def == o; :great; end; def != o; :horrible; end; end

20 messages 2008/12/30
[#20979] Re: Definable != is a Bad Thing™ — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/12/30

Hi,

[#20994] [Bug #956] Encoding: nl_langinfo(CODESET) on cygwin 1.5 always returns US-ASCII — Tom Link <redmine@...>

Bug #956: Encoding: nl_langinfo(CODESET) on cygwin 1.5 always returns US-ASCII

10 messages 2008/12/30

[#20999] Supporting Thread.critical=with native threads — Shri Borde <Shri.Borde@...>

Hi,

27 messages 2008/12/30
[#21002] Re: Supporting Thread.critical=with native threads — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/12/31

On Dec 30, 2008, at 15:00 PM, Shri Borde wrote:

[#21010] Re: Supporting Thread.critical=with native threads — Shri Borde <Shri.Borde@...> 2008/12/31

http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/Thread.html#M000461 says:

[#21245] Re: Supporting Thread.critical=with native threads — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2009/01/10

I'm starting come around to Shri's idea of critical= being represented

[#21353] Re: Supporting Thread.critical=with native threads — Shri Borde <Shri.Borde@...> 2009/01/14

SXMgb3BlbmluZyBhIGJ1ZyB0aGUgcmVjb21tZW5kZWQgd2F5IHRvIGdldCB0aGUgc3BlYyBjaGFu

[#21359] Re: Supporting Thread.critical=with native threads — Brent Roman <brent@...> 2009/01/15

[ruby-core:20345] Achieving C-like performance with more indirection?

From: Jan Wedekind <jan@...>
Date: 2008-12-05 01:29:53 UTC
List: ruby-core #20345
   I am working on a Ruby-extension for doing real-time computer vision
[1]. In the past I've used static C++ code to optimise the computationally
expensive parts of the program. Recently I have replaced all this C++
code with Ruby code which makes use of libJIT [2] (i.e. the only
remaining C++ code is for I/O integration). The performance currently
is about 50% percent of an equivalent C++ implementation and there are
still possibilities for optimisation (caching compiled methods,
loop-unrolling).
   Here is an example illustrating the principle:

# To compile a function like the following one ...
def plus( a, b )
   a + b
end

# ... one can let it perform computations on JIT-variables so that
# "plus" will return a block of optimised code instead of a number.
fun = JITFunction.compile( JITType::LINT,
                            JITType::LINT, JITType::LINT ) do |f,a,b|
   plus( a, b )
end

As far as I know it is not possible however to apply this approach to 
functions containing the structural elements "while" or "if-then-else".
    Of course one could think about interpreting the code of the 
method "plus" using ruby2ruby or obtaining a parse-tree of "plus" in some
way. However this is not really satisfactory. According to [3] this
does not really address the problem since this approach leads to
an endless tower of reflective interpreters (language interpreted by
an interpreter, which is in turn interpreted by an interpreter).
    [3] points out theoretical work by Friedman and Wand eliminating
the tower of interpreters by using reification: "Reification is the
conversion of an interpreter component into an object which the program
can manipulate."
    I don't really know Smalltalk. But for example if "while" and "if"
where methods, one could optimise more sophisticated Ruby programs
by manipulating the behaviour of the Ruby VM in a particular context.
Currently I need to write programs which are calling special methods
which imitate loops and conditionals (also see Paul Brannan's
ruby-libjit):

def inc( p, pend, x, f )
   f.until( proc { p == pend } ) do
     LINT.jit_store(  LINT.jit_load( f, p ) + x, p )
     p.inc!( LINT.size )
   end
end

Has this already been considered before?
I'd be interested if there is anything related I should know about.

[1] http://rubyforge.org/projects/hornetseye/
[2] http://www.dotgnu.org/libjit-doc/libjit.html
[3] http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~scg/Archive/PhD/denker-phd.pdf

In This Thread

Prev Next