[#18121] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #405] (Open) ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #405 has been reported by Anonymous.

14 messages 2008/08/04

[#18130] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

> Seriously though... Array.first is a noun.

10 messages 2008/08/05

[#18319] NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

14 messages 2008/08/16
[#18321] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/18

Hi,

[#18381] [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #496: DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow

11 messages 2008/08/25

[ruby-core:18386] Re: New Command Revisted

From: "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
Date: 2008-08-26 12:36:47 UTC
List: ruby-core #18386
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: [ruby-core:18384] New Command Revisted"
>
> |If you do not like "File.absolute_path()",  have you
> |considered adding a parameter to File.expand_path:
> |
> |I see two possibilities:
> |
> |1)   File.expand_path( file_name [, ABS  [, dir_string] ] ) 
> |2)  File.expand_path( file_name [, dir_string  [, ABS] ] )
> |
> |     ---Where ABS is true for absolute path processing.
>
> From the past experience, adding a boolean flag as an argument is not
> really a good idea for API design, since it hinders readability.  You
> will have no clue to know what true mean in the future.  I'd take
> absolute_path idea, rather than adding a boolean flag.
>
> 							matz.
>
>
>   
That was my view of the situation, but I wanted
to offer a choice.

Chuck

-- 
Competency and chastity have much in common,
they both encompass their own punishment! 
 
-- C.E. Thornton -- Hawthorne Press --


In This Thread

Prev Next