[#18121] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #405] (Open) ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #405 has been reported by Anonymous.

14 messages 2008/08/04

[#18130] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

> Seriously though... Array.first is a noun.

10 messages 2008/08/05

[#18319] NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

14 messages 2008/08/16
[#18321] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/18

Hi,

[#18381] [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #496: DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow

11 messages 2008/08/25

[ruby-core:18272] Re: Am I right that this is wrong?

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2008-08-13 15:16:12 UTC
List: ruby-core #18272
Hi,

In message "Re: [ruby-core:18263] Am I right that this is wrong?"
    on Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:33:18 +0900, "David A. Black" <dblack@rubypal.com> writes:

|  *  call-seq:
|  *     mod.instance_methods(include_super=true)   => array
|  *
|  *  Returns an array containing the names of public instance methods
|  *  in the receiver. For a module, these are the public methods; for a
|  *  class, they are the instance (not singleton) methods. With no
|  *  argument, or with an argument that is <code>false</code>, the
|  *  instance methods in <i>mod</i> are returned, otherwise the methods
|  *  in <i>mod</i> and <i>mod</i>'s superclasses are returned.
|
|Since include_super defaults to true, I believe the "With no argument"
|statement is wrong. These arbitrary boolean arguments are definitely
|confusing, so I just wanted to make sure I'm right that it's wrong.

The documentation is wrong, as you say.  If many prefer the documented
behavior and want to change it, it is another story.

							matz.

In This Thread