[#18121] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #405] (Open) ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #405 has been reported by Anonymous.

14 messages 2008/08/04

[#18130] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

> Seriously though... Array.first is a noun.

10 messages 2008/08/05

[#18319] NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

14 messages 2008/08/16
[#18321] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/18

Hi,

[#18381] [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #496: DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow

11 messages 2008/08/25

[ruby-core:18162] Re: [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal"

From: Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
Date: 2008-08-07 08:37:08 UTC
List: ruby-core #18162
Hi,

At Wed, 6 Aug 2008 22:05:00 +0900,
Otto Hilska wrote in [ruby-core:18148]:
> It's still available for the scripts. For example, running in Rails 
> environment:
> 
>  >> Object.subclasses
> SyntaxError: (eval):1:in `subclasses_of': compile error
> (eval):1: syntax error, unexpected tIDENTIFIER, expecting tCONSTANT
> defined?(::fatal) && ::fatal.object_id == k.object_id
>                  ^

What do you mean by that error?

> If 'fatal' should not be used in scripts, changing the name should not 
> cause compatibility issues either. So what are the reasons for keeping 
> it lower-case?

`fatal' means the case that user scripts can't/shouldn't
raise/rescue it.

First, why and how do you need it?

-- 
Nobu Nakada

In This Thread