[#18042] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — gdefty@...
Hi,
[#18052] Enumerators that know about a block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#18086] Suggestion to change Time#to_s format to an official standard — Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...>
Hello people,
[#18110] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #403] (Open) Add support to Haiku — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Issue #403 has been reported by Anonymous.
[#18121] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #405] (Open) ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Issue #405 has been reported by Anonymous.
[#18130] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>
> Seriously though... Array.first is a noun.
[#18145] [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal" — Otto Hilska <otto.hilska@...>
Hi,
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 15:48, Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net> wrote:
[#18164] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — gdefty@...
In message "Re: [ruby-core:18133] Re: New array
[#18237] Severe problem with garbage collection — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
[#18247] Thread#priority(=) will be obsolete — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
[#18252] Re: result for mget [last:10 MIME/multipart] (1/1) (ruby-core ML) — "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@...>
>> We are planning to make Thread#priority(=) method as obsolete method
Hi,
[#18257] Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>
Hi, all.
HI! This answers the question that I asked a few days ago, thank you!
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#18263] Am I right that this is wrong? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
Hi,
Hi --
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:04 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#18303] Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization — kevin nolan <kpnolan@...>
After compiling Ruby 1.8.6 with '-O3 -mtune=K8 -march=K8' on an AMD 4800
kevin nolan:
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 03:39 +0900, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) wrote:
[#18314] [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Bug #449: File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows
Hi,
I submitted that original bug (first time using redmine :)). Here's some mo=
Hi,
Not at all - it means we're now free to do the right thing :)
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:45 PM, John Lam (IRONRUBY)
[#18319] NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
Core,
Hi,
Are you sure you didn't mean to use "~/oracle/bin"
Trans wrote:
[#18349] [Feature:1.9] autoload with a block — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
Hi,
[#18354] Retrieving bytecode for method — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
Hi,
[#18381] [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>
Bug #496: DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow
[#18387] [Bug:1.9] rubygems fails to cache spec file — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...>
Hi,
[#18396] problems with test_io.rb on cygwin — Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
I have run into problems with test_io.rb on cygwin.
Hello,
[#18405] [Bug #512] String#% behavior — Federico Builes <redmine@...>
Bug #512: String#% behavior
[#18409] ruby-lang.org has old download links — Nate_Wiger@...
The download links here:
[#18414] DoS vulnerability in REXML — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...>
Hi,
[#18424] [Bug #528] Several ruby-mode.el improvements — Nathan Weizenbaum <redmine@...>
Bug #528: Several ruby-mode.el improvements
[ruby-core:18259] Re: Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers
On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 13:10 +0900, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) wrote:
> == Support plan of Ruby 1.9.1
> Supported:
> * Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 on IA32
1. You might want to change that to "Lenny" -- I believe it will be
released/stable before Ruby 1.9.1 is.
2. Most of the Linux distros have Ruby maintainers/herds already, so I
don't think you need to worry about supporting them. And Gentoo builds
from source, so that one is more or less automatic once you release a
source tarball. But I think it's a serious mistake not to support
Fedora. At the very least, you should seriously consider building RPMs
as well as .debs.
> These 7 platforms are now "perhaps", they can be "best effort" if a
> maintainer appears.
> * x64 GNU/Linux
I do builds from source on my Gentoo x86_64 all the time with no trouble
at all. And, as I mentioned above, chances are pretty good it will be in
Gentoo for all of the platforms where it compiles, or at least, it will
be in the Ruby overlay. They've got jRuby and a rather ancient Rubinius
too.
> The tasks which a maintainer should do are:
> * Subscribe ruby-core@ruby-lang.org list.
> * Also, subscribe ruby-dev@ruby-lang.org if you can read Japanese.
> * Port thread_{win32,pathread}.c to the platform if it has no
> implementation of pthread.
Is there a Linux distro that *doesn't* have pthread?
> * Resolve other build errors and platform specific problems.
As noted above, I do this all the time on Gentoo x86_64. I don't have
any plans to "downgrade" to a 32-bit box anytime soon, although if
you're *real nice*, I might test it on my One Laptop Per Child XO. :)
> * Constantly build and test the trunk version of Ruby on it.
Define "constantly" ... is once a week enough?
> * Effort to succeed in "make test-all" by 20 Dec.
>
> Please send a mail to ruby-core@ruby-lang.org list and run for a
> maintainer if you can.
Well ... between me and the Gentoo Ruby herd, I think we can help out.
See https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203706 for the status of
Ruby 1.9.x on Gentoo.
>
> Regards,
>
--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
ruby-perspectives.blogspot.com
"A mathematician is a machine for turning coffee into theorems." --
Alfrテゥd Rテゥnyi via Paul Erdナ壮