[#18042] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — gdefty@...
Hi,
[#18052] Enumerators that know about a block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#18086] Suggestion to change Time#to_s format to an official standard — Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...>
Hello people,
[#18110] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #403] (Open) Add support to Haiku — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Issue #403 has been reported by Anonymous.
[#18121] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #405] (Open) ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Issue #405 has been reported by Anonymous.
[#18130] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>
> Seriously though... Array.first is a noun.
[#18145] [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal" — Otto Hilska <otto.hilska@...>
Hi,
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 15:48, Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net> wrote:
[#18164] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — gdefty@...
In message "Re: [ruby-core:18133] Re: New array
[#18237] Severe problem with garbage collection — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
[#18247] Thread#priority(=) will be obsolete — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
[#18252] Re: result for mget [last:10 MIME/multipart] (1/1) (ruby-core ML) — "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@...>
>> We are planning to make Thread#priority(=) method as obsolete method
Hi,
[#18257] Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>
Hi, all.
HI! This answers the question that I asked a few days ago, thank you!
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#18263] Am I right that this is wrong? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
Hi,
Hi --
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:04 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#18303] Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization — kevin nolan <kpnolan@...>
After compiling Ruby 1.8.6 with '-O3 -mtune=K8 -march=K8' on an AMD 4800
kevin nolan:
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 03:39 +0900, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) wrote:
[#18314] [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Bug #449: File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows
Hi,
I submitted that original bug (first time using redmine :)). Here's some mo=
Hi,
Not at all - it means we're now free to do the right thing :)
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:45 PM, John Lam (IRONRUBY)
[#18319] NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
Core,
Hi,
Are you sure you didn't mean to use "~/oracle/bin"
Trans wrote:
[#18349] [Feature:1.9] autoload with a block — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
Hi,
[#18354] Retrieving bytecode for method — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
Hi,
[#18381] [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>
Bug #496: DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow
[#18387] [Bug:1.9] rubygems fails to cache spec file — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...>
Hi,
[#18396] problems with test_io.rb on cygwin — Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
I have run into problems with test_io.rb on cygwin.
Hello,
[#18405] [Bug #512] String#% behavior — Federico Builes <redmine@...>
Bug #512: String#% behavior
[#18409] ruby-lang.org has old download links — Nate_Wiger@...
The download links here:
[#18414] DoS vulnerability in REXML — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...>
Hi,
[#18424] [Bug #528] Several ruby-mode.el improvements — Nathan Weizenbaum <redmine@...>
Bug #528: Several ruby-mode.el improvements
[ruby-core:18257] Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers
Hi, all.
Ruby committers had the Ruby developers camp 20080811
(http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/wiki/ruby/DevelopersCamp20080811 ). We
talked about platforms which Ruby will support, and decided 4 "support
levels" yesterday.
== support levels
The support levels are "supported", "best effort", "perhaps" and "not
supported". Note that "Platform has a maintainer" includes "Some of core
developers always develop Ruby on it", for example, Debian GNU/Linux.
Supported:
Officially, fully supported. Ruby will be never released while Ruby
has errors on "supported" platforms.
A platform is "supported" when
* The platform has at least one maintainer. One or more maintainer(s)
maintains Ruby on it.
* We can build Ruby for it.
* We can expect that "make test-all" almost succeed.
* We have the nightly build&test environment for it.
Best effort:
We want Ruby to support the platform but some errors occur constantly
on it.
Ruby will be never released while Ruby has serious errors on
"best effort" platforms.
A platform is "best effort" when
* The platform has at least one maintainer.
* We can build Ruby for it.
* We can expect that "make test-all" success except some known
problems.
OR
We have no nightly build&test environemnt for it.
Perhaps:
We think Ruby can work on the platform but it is not officially
supported. Ruby can be released even if Ruby has errors on it.
A platform is "perhaps"
* A similar platform is "supported" or "best effort".
Not supported:
We don't know whether Ruby works on it or not.
== Support plan of Ruby 1.9.1
Supported:
* Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 on IA32
Best effort:
* mswin32, x64-mswin64, mingw32
* Mac OS X (Intel)
* FreeBSD (amd64, IA32)
Perhaps:
* Other Linux distributions
* Mac OS X (PPC)
* mingw64
* cygwin
* Other POSIX compatible systems.
* BeOS (Haiku)
Not supported:
Anything other. But, I think the following platforms can be
"best effort" or "supported" if someone become a maintainer.
* OpenVMS
* WinCE
* OS/2
* bcc32
* Classic MacOS
== Maintainers are wanted
I want someone to become a maintainer and maintains Ruby 1.9 for one of
the following platforms.
These 7 platforms are now "perhaps", they can be "best effort" if a
maintainer appears.
* cygwin
* Interix
* Itanium platforms (Windows, GNU/Linux, ...)
* PPC platforms
* x64 GNU/Linux
* *BSD
* BeOS (Haiku)
These 5 platforms are now "not supported", they can be "best effort" if
a maintainer appears.
* OpenVMS
* WinCE
* OS/2
* bcc32
* Classic MacOS
The tasks which a maintainer should do are:
* Subscribe ruby-core@ruby-lang.org list.
* Also, subscribe ruby-dev@ruby-lang.org if you can read Japanese.
* Port thread_{win32,pathread}.c to the platform if it has no
implementation of pthread.
* Resolve other build errors and platform specific problems.
* Constantly build and test the trunk version of Ruby on it.
* Effort to succeed in "make test-all" by 20 Dec.
Please send a mail to ruby-core@ruby-lang.org list and run for a
maintainer if you can.
Regards,
--
Yugui <yugui@yugui.jp>
http://yugui.jp