ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#18041] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #382] (Open) Dir#tell leads to segfaults in Dir#read on win32 — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #382 has been reported by Anonymous.

2 messages 2008/08/01
[#18222] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #382] (Closed) Dir#tell leads to segfaults in Dir#read on win32 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2008/08/10

Issue #382 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#18042] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — gdefty@...

Hi,

3 messages 2008/08/01
[#18043] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — "Jacob Fugal" <lukfugl@...> 2008/08/01

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:39 PM, <gdefty@attglobal.net> wrote:
[#18044] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — "Jacob Fugal" <lukfugl@...> 2008/08/01

On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Jacob Fugal <lukfugl@gmail.com> wrote:

[#18045] finalizers in 1.8 no longer run after gc_sweep() — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

This was brought up by Roger Pack in [ruby-talk:309757].

4 messages 2008/08/01
[#18049] Re: finalizers in 1.8 no longer run after gc_sweep() — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/08/01

In most garbage collectors I know of, it's unwise to have hard
[#18050] Re: finalizers in 1.8 no longer run after gc_sweep() — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/01

Hi,
[#18063] Re: finalizers in 1.8 no longer run after gc_sweep() — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/08/01

On Aug 1, 2008, at 01:59 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#18052] Enumerators that know about a block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

8 messages 2008/08/01
[#18129] Re: Enumerators that know about a block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/08/05

Hi --
[#18137] Re: Enumerators that know about a block — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...> 2008/08/06

Hi,
[#18138] Re: Enumerators that know about a block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/08/06

Hi --
[#18139] Re: Enumerators that know about a block — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...> 2008/08/06

Hi,
[#18144] Re: Enumerators that know about a block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/08/06

Hi --
[#18149] Re: Enumerators that know about a block — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...> 2008/08/06

Hi,
[#18150] Re: Enumerators that know about a block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/08/06

Hi --

[#18057] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #384] (Open) Net::FTP#chdir raises NoMethodError — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #384 has been reported by Anonymous.

2 messages 2008/08/01
[#18127] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #384] (Closed) Net::FTP#chdir raises NoMethodError — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...> 2008/08/05

Issue #384 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.

[#18058] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #385] (Open) Net::FTP#login raises TypeErrors — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #385 has been reported by Anonymous.

4 messages 2008/08/01
[#18169] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #385] (Closed) Net::FTP#login raises TypeErrors — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...> 2008/08/07

Issue #385 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.
[#18128] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #385] Net::FTP#login raises TypeErrors — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...> 2008/08/05

Issue #385 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.
[#18159] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #385] Net::FTP#login raises TypeErrors — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...> 2008/08/07

Issue #385 has been updated by Arthur Schreiber.

[#18076] Equality of recursive arrays — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2008/08/02
[#18077] Re: Equality of recursive arrays — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/02

Hi,
[#18079] Re: Equality of recursive arrays — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/08/02

Hi,

[#18086] Suggestion to change Time#to_s format to an official standard — Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...>

Hello people,

5 messages 2008/08/02
[#18088] Re: Suggestion to change Time#to_s format to an official standard — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/08/02

Dirkjan Bussink wrote:
[#18089] Re: Suggestion to change Time#to_s format to an official standard — Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...> 2008/08/02

[#18090] Re: Suggestion to change Time#to_s format to an official standard — ?? <naruse@...> 2008/08/02

Dirkjan Bussink wrote:
[#18091] Re: Suggestion to change Time#to_s format to an official standard — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2008/08/02

FYI, Ruby 1.9 uses another format, "2008-08-03 06:16:10 +0900".

[#18092] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #400] (Open) Possible bug in IO#ungetc — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #400 has been reported by Anonymous.

4 messages 2008/08/03
[#18093] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #400] (Open) Possible bug in IO#ungetc — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/03

Hi,
[#18094] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #400] Possible bug in IO#ungetc — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2008/08/03

Issue #400 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#18095] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #400] Possible bug in IO#ungetc — Federico Builes <redmine@...> 2008/08/03

Issue #400 has been updated by Federico Builes.

[#18096] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — gdefty@...

Matz,

1 message 2008/08/03

[#18110] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #403] (Open) Add support to Haiku — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #403 has been reported by Anonymous.

7 messages 2008/08/03
[#18123] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #403] Add support to Haiku — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2008/08/04

Issue #403 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#18125] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #403] Add support to Haiku — Olivier Coursière <redmine@...> 2008/08/05

Issue #403 has been updated by Olivier Coursi竪re.
[#18152] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #403] Add support to Haiku — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2008/08/06

Issue #403 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#18160] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #403] Add support to Haiku — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/07

Hi,
[#18167] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #403] Add support to Haiku — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2008/08/07

Issue #403 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
[#18224] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #403] (Closed) Add support to Haiku — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2008/08/10

Issue #403 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#18112] module inclusion and method definitions — Jérémy Zurcher <jeremy@...>

hello,

2 messages 2008/08/03
[#18120] Re: module inclusion and method definitions — Jens Wille <jens.wille@...> 2008/08/04

hi j辿r辿my!

[#18113] Another ruby-mode.el patch: quicker here-doc detection — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...>

Hi again,

1 message 2008/08/04

[#18115] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — gdefty@...

on Mon, August 04, 2008, Yukihiro Matsumoto writes:

2 messages 2008/08/04
[#18116] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/04

Hi,

[#18119] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — gdefty@...

on Mon, August 04, 2008, 16:51:00, Yukihiro

1 message 2008/08/04

[#18121] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #405] (Open) ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #405 has been reported by Anonymous.

14 messages 2008/08/04
[#18122] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #405] ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2008/08/04

Issue #405 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#18743] [Bug #405] ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Pirkka Hartikainen <redmine@...> 2008/09/19

Issue #405 has been updated by Pirkka Hartikainen.
[#19773] [Bug #405] ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Evan W <redmine@...> 2008/11/10

Issue #405 has been updated by Evan W.
[#22271] [Bug #405] ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Matt G <redmine@...> 2009/02/19

Issue #405 has been updated by Matt G.
[#22546] Re: [Bug #405] ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Roger Pack <rogerdpack@...> 2009/02/26

what versions of openssl are you using?
[#22954] [Bug #405] ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Matt Darby <redmine@...> 2009/03/19

Issue #405 has been updated by Matt Darby.
[#22964] [Bug #405] ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Chas Lemley <redmine@...> 2009/03/20

Issue #405 has been updated by Chas Lemley.
[#23014] [Bug #405] ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Matt Gardner <redmine@...> 2009/03/24

Issue #405 has been updated by Matt Gardner.
[#23034] [Bug #405] ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/03/27

Issue #405 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#23989] [Bug #405] ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Christian Höltje <redmine@...> 2009/06/23

Issue #405 has been updated by Christian H旦ltje.
[#30210] [Bug #405] ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Christian Höltje <redmine@...> 2010/05/13

Issue #405 has been updated by Christian H旦ltje.
[#30213] [Bug #405] ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Christian Höltje <redmine@...> 2010/05/13

Issue #405 has been updated by Christian H旦ltje.
[#30214] [Bug #405] ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Christian Höltje <redmine@...> 2010/05/13

Issue #405 has been updated by Christian H旦ltje.

[#18126] Ruby (interpreter) C source code — "Ranieri Teixeira" <ranieri.tx@...>

SGkgUnVieSB0ZWFtLApJJ20gaW50ZXJlc3RlZCBpbiB0byBjb21wbGltZW50IG15ICJDb21waWxl

2 messages 2008/08/05
[#18141] Re: Ruby (interpreter) C source code — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/08/06

What documentation on Ruby Internals exists is at

[#18130] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

> Seriously though... Array.first is a noun.

10 messages 2008/08/05
[#18131] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — "Jim Freeze" <jimfreeze@...> 2008/08/05

On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> wrote:
[#18135] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/08/05

Brian Candler wrote:
[#18136] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/08/06

[#18140] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/08/06

[#18142] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/08/06

Jim Weirich wrote:
[#18151] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...> 2008/08/06

Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@gmail.com> writes:
[#18143] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2008/08/06

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#18203] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/08/08

[#18173] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2008/08/07

On 05/08/2008, Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> wrote:

[#18132] Another question about IO#ungetc — Federico Builes <federico.builes@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2008/08/05
[#18147] Re: Another question about IO#ungetc — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/06

Hi,

[#18145] [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal" — Otto Hilska <otto.hilska@...>

Hi,

9 messages 2008/08/06
[#18146] Re: [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal" — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/06

Hi,
[#18148] Re: [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal" — Otto Hilska <otto.hilska@...> 2008/08/06

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#18162] Re: [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal" — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/07

Hi,
[#18174] Re: [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal" — "Jeremy Kemper" <jeremy@...> 2008/08/07

On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#18180] Re: [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal" — "Daniel Luz" <dev@...> 2008/08/07

On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 15:48, Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net> wrote:
[#18184] Re: [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal" — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/08/08

Daniel Luz wrote:
[#18193] Re: [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal" — "Jeremy Kemper" <jeremy@...> 2008/08/08

On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#18197] Re: [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal" — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/08

Hi,

[#18158] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #410] (Open) base64 decode flaw — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #410 has been reported by Anonymous.

5 messages 2008/08/07
[#18179] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #410] base64 decode flaw — Neal Tucker <redmine@...> 2008/08/07

Issue #410 has been updated by Neal Tucker.
[#18161] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #410] base64 decode flaw — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2008/08/07

Issue #410 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#18170] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #410] base64 decode flaw — Brian Candler <redmine@...> 2008/08/07

Issue #410 has been updated by Brian Candler.
[#18178] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #410] base64 decode flaw — Neal Tucker <redmine@...> 2008/08/07

Issue #410 has been updated by Neal Tucker.

[#18164] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — gdefty@...

In message "Re: [ruby-core:18133] Re: New array

6 messages 2008/08/07
[#18165] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/07

Hi,
[#18168] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/08/07

Hi --
[#18175] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/08/07

David A. Black wrote:
[#18176] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/08/07

Hi --
[#18172] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — "Martin DeMello" <martindemello@...> 2008/08/07

On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 3:11 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#18199] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — gdefty@...

Hi,

2 messages 2008/08/08
[#18200] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/08/08

Hi --

[#18201] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #411] (Open) id collision in ordered map — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #411 has been reported by Anonymous.

4 messages 2008/08/08
[#21788] [Bug #411](Closed) id collision in ordered map — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/02/03

Issue #411 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#18205] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #411] id collision in ordered map — Peter Bowen <redmine@...> 2008/08/08

Issue #411 has been updated by Peter Bowen.
[#18218] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #411] (Open) id collision in ordered map — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/09

Hi,

[#18207] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #412] (Open) Stack length should be long — Peter Bowen <redmine@...>

Issue #412 has been reported by Peter Bowen.

3 messages 2008/08/08
[#18214] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #412] Stack length should be long — Peter Bowen <redmine@...> 2008/08/09

Issue #412 has been updated by Peter Bowen.
[#18221] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #412] (Closed) Stack length should be long — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2008/08/09

Issue #412 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#18208] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #413] (Open) main() needs to return int — Peter Bowen <redmine@...>

Issue #413 has been reported by Peter Bowen.

3 messages 2008/08/08
[#18213] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #413] main() needs to return int — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2008/08/09

Issue #413 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#18217] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #413] main() needs to return int — Peter Bowen <redmine@...> 2008/08/09

Issue #413 has been updated by Peter Bowen.

[#18211] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #414] (Open) Invalid C preprocessor code — Peter Bowen <redmine@...>

Issue #414 has been reported by Peter Bowen.

2 messages 2008/08/08
[#18215] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #414] (Closed) Invalid C preprocessor code — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2008/08/09

Issue #414 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#18216] Problems with Compiling 1.9 Trunk — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

1 message 2008/08/09

[#18223] release naming consistency — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

> % ls ~/.multiruby/{versions,build}

4 messages 2008/08/10
[#18225] Re: release naming consistency — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/10

Hi,
[#18229] Re: release naming consistency — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/08/10

[#18232] Re: release naming consistency — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/10

Hi,

[#18226] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — gdefty@...

Hi,

2 messages 2008/08/10
[#18230] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/08/10

Hi --

[#18227] First Message & BCC32 Platform — Mohit SIndhwani <rcore_ml@...>

Hi Everyone

3 messages 2008/08/10
[#18416] Re: First Message & BCC32 Platform — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...> 2008/08/28

Hi Mohit
[#18420] Re: First Message & BCC32 Platform — Mohit Sindhwani <rcore_ml@...> 2008/08/28

Hi Yugui

[#18228] Compiling Ruby 1.9.x — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Sorry to repeat myself. BUT...

4 messages 2008/08/10
[#18231] Re: Compiling Ruby 1.9.x — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/10

Hi,
[#18233] Re: Compiling Ruby 1.9.x — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/08/10

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#18234] Re: Compiling Ruby 1.9.x — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/08/10

C.E. Thornton wrote:

[#18235] !.9.0 Trunk Complile Failure — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

1 message 2008/08/10

[#18236] 1.9.0 Compile Problems — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

1 message 2008/08/11

[#18237] Severe problem with garbage collection — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2008/08/11
[#18242] Re: Severe problem with garbage collection — "Igal Koshevoy" <igal@...> 2008/08/11

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:39 AM, Bertram Scharpf
[#18243] Re: Severe problem with garbage collection — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...> 2008/08/11

Hi,
[#18238] Re: Severe problem with garbage collection — Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist@...> 2008/08/11

[#18239] Re: Severe problem with garbage collection — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2008/08/11

Bertram Scharpf wrote:

[#18240] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #417] (Open) pedantic warning/error in header — Peter Bowen <redmine@...>

Issue #417 has been reported by Peter Bowen.

2 messages 2008/08/11
[#25549] [Bug #417](Closed) pedantic warning/error in header — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/13

Issue #417 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#18241] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #418] (Open) date2 library has two methods marked private unnecessarily — Peter Bowen <redmine@...>

Issue #418 has been reported by Peter Bowen.

3 messages 2008/08/11
[#23043] [Bug #418] date2 library has two methods marked private unnecessarily — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/03/28

Issue #418 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.
[#24840] [Bug #418](Rejected) date2 library has two methods marked private unnecessarily — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/08/09

Issue #418 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#18244] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #419] (Open) [PATCH] Hash#default_proc= — Giuseppe Bilotta <redmine@...>

Issue #419 has been reported by Giuseppe Bilotta.

1 message 2008/08/11

[#18245] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #419] [PATCH] Hash#default_proc= — Giuseppe Bilotta <redmine@...>

Issue #419 has been updated by Giuseppe Bilotta.

1 message 2008/08/11

[#18246] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Feature #420] (Open) [PATCH] Hash#default_proc= — Giuseppe Bilotta <redmine@...>

Issue #420 has been reported by Giuseppe Bilotta.

1 message 2008/08/11

[#18247] Thread#priority(=) will be obsolete — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2008/08/12
[#18251] Re: Thread#priority(=) will be obsolete — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/08/12

On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 18:06 +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#18254] Re: Thread#priority(=) will be obsolete — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/08/13

Hi,
[#18489] Re: Thread#priority(=) will be obsolete — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2008/09/08

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:27:14AM +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:

[#18248] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #427] (Open) FileTest return values — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #427 has been reported by Anonymous.

2 messages 2008/08/12
[#18800] [Feature #427](Rejected) FileTest return values — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2008/09/23

Issue #427 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#18252] Re: result for mget [last:10 MIME/multipart] (1/1) (ruby-core ML) — "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@...>

>> We are planning to make Thread#priority(=) method as obsolete method

5 messages 2008/08/12
[#18255] Re: result for mget [last:10 MIME/multipart] (1/1) (ruby-core ML) — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/08/13

Hi,
[#18258] Re: result for mget [last:10 MIME/multipart] (1/1) (ruby-core ML) — "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@...> 2008/08/13

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 4:35 AM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#18277] Re: result for mget [last:10 MIME/multipart] (1/1) (ruby-core ML) — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/08/13

Hi,
[#18256] Re: Thread#priority(=) will be obsolete — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2008/08/13

[#18257] Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>

Hi, all.

7 messages 2008/08/13
[#18259] Re: Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/08/13

On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 13:10 +0900, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) wrote:
[#18266] Re: Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers — Mohit SIndhwani <rcore_ml@...> 2008/08/13

HI! This answers the question that I asked a few days ago, thank you!
[#18267] Re: Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/13

Hi,
[#18270] Re: Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers — Mohit SIndhwani <rcore_ml@...> 2008/08/13

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#18271] Re: Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/13

Hi,
[#18274] Re: Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers — Mohit Sindhwani <rcore_ml@...> 2008/08/13

Hi Matz

[#18260] [Bug #419](Closed) [PATCH] Hash#default_proc= — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...>

Issue #419 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

1 message 2008/08/13

[#18261] [Feature #420](Closed) [PATCH] Hash#default_proc= — Akinori MUSHA <redmine@...>

Issue #420 has been updated by Akinori MUSHA.

1 message 2008/08/13

[#18262] [Bug #435] open-uri.rb 407 Proxy Authentication Required (OpenURI::HTTPError) — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Bug #435: open-uri.rb 407 Proxy Authentication Required (OpenURI::HTTPError)

2 messages 2008/08/13
[#20868] [Bug #435](Rejected) open-uri.rb 407 Proxy Authentication Required (OpenURI::HTTPError) — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2008/12/25

Issue #435 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.

[#18263] Am I right that this is wrong? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

13 messages 2008/08/13
[#18268] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — "Gregory Brown" <gregory.t.brown@...> 2008/08/13

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 9:33 AM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#18269] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/08/13

[#18272] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/13

Hi,
[#18275] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/08/13

Hi --
[#18276] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — "Gregory Brown" <gregory.t.brown@...> 2008/08/13

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:04 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#18278] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/08/13

Hi --
[#18279] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — "Gregory Brown" <gregory.t.brown@...> 2008/08/13

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 5:43 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#18280] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/08/13

[#18281] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/08/14

Hi --
[#18283] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/08/14

[#18286] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/14

Hi,
[#18297] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/08/14

Hi --

[#18264] [Bug #436] test_list(TestThread) fails on Solaris/x64 — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...>

Bug #436: test_list(TestThread) fails on Solaris/x64

2 messages 2008/08/13
[#18265] [Bug #436](Closed) test_list(TestThread) fails on Solaris/x64 — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...> 2008/08/13

Issue #436 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.

[#18282] Instance methods of a class's singleton class... — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

1 message 2008/08/14

[#18288] [Feature #440] Better introspection for methods (declaring class, arity) — Lasse Koskela <redmine@...>

Feature #440: Better introspection for methods (declaring class, arity)

6 messages 2008/08/14
[#26173] [Feature #440](Feedback) Better introspection for methods (declaring class, arity) — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/10/19

Issue #440 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#18784] [Feature #440] Better introspection for methods (declaring class, arity) — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2008/09/22

Issue #440 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
[#19050] [Feature #440] Better introspection for methods (declaring class, arity) — Lasse Koskela <redmine@...> 2008/09/30

Issue #440 has been updated by Lasse Koskela.
[#19669] [Feature #440] Better introspection for methods (declaring class, arity) — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2008/10/31

Issue #440 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#28849] [Feature #440](Closed) Better introspection for methods (declaring class, arity) — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/22

Issue #440 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#18291] [Bug #441] [PATCH] Hash#default= has wrong rdoc — Giuseppe Bilotta <redmine@...>

Bug #441: [PATCH] Hash#default= has wrong rdoc

3 messages 2008/08/14
[#18292] [Bug #441] [PATCH] Hash#default= has wrong rdoc — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2008/08/14

Issue #441 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
[#18294] [Bug #441](Closed) [PATCH] Hash#default= has wrong rdoc — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2008/08/14

Issue #441 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#18293] absolute_path() Implementation patch for 1.9 trunk — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

1 message 2008/08/14

[#18298] Heisencallback? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

3 messages 2008/08/14
[#18299] Re: Heisencallback? — Calamitas <calamitates@...> 2008/08/14

On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 3:24 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#18300] Re: Heisencallback? — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/08/14

[#18301] redmine.ruby-lang.org unavailable? — "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@...>

Hello all,

1 message 2008/08/14

[#18303] Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization — kevin nolan <kpnolan@...>

After compiling Ruby 1.8.6 with '-O3 -mtune=K8 -march=K8' on an AMD 4800

7 messages 2008/08/14
[#18305] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/08/15

On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 02:19 +0900, kevin nolan wrote:
[#18313] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization — "Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)" <shot@...> 2008/08/15

kevin nolan:
[#18316] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/08/16

On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 03:39 +0900, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) wrote:
[#18320] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization — Prashant Srinivasan <Prashant.Srinivasan@...> 2008/08/16

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
[#19396] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization — "Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)" <shot@...> 2008/10/20

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky:
[#19400] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2008/10/20

On 20/10/2008, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) <shot@hot.pl> wrote:

[#18306] [Bug #443] [PATCH] CGI#checkbox_group raises a TypeError when passing false as checked value — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Bug #443: [PATCH] CGI#checkbox_group raises a TypeError when passing false as checked value

2 messages 2008/08/15
[#19002] [Bug #443](Rejected) [PATCH] CGI#checkbox_group raises a TypeError when passing false as checked value — Takeyuki Fujioka <redmine@...> 2008/09/28

Issue #443 has been updated by Takeyuki Fujioka.

[#18307] [Bug #444] [PATCH] CGI#radio_group raises a TypeError when passing false as checked value — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Bug #444: [PATCH] CGI#radio_group raises a TypeError when passing false as checked value

2 messages 2008/08/15
[#19001] [Bug #444](Rejected) [PATCH] CGI#radio_group raises a TypeError when passing false as checked value — Takeyuki Fujioka <redmine@...> 2008/09/28

Issue #444 has been updated by Takeyuki Fujioka.

[#18308] [Bug #445] [PATCH] Net::HTTPHeaders#fetch raises NoMethodError instead of returning default values — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Bug #445: [PATCH] Net::HTTPHeaders#fetch raises NoMethodError instead of returning default values

2 messages 2008/08/15
[#25552] [Bug #445](Closed) [PATCH] Net::HTTPHeaders#fetch raises NoMethodError instead of returning default values — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/13

Issue #445 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#18309] [Bug #446] [PATCH] [DOC] Net::HTTPHeaders#fetch does not return nil but raises IndexError — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Bug #446: [PATCH] [DOC] Net::HTTPHeaders#fetch does not return nil but raises IndexError

2 messages 2008/08/15
[#25520] [Bug #446](Closed) [PATCH] [DOC] Net::HTTPHeaders#fetch does not return nil but raises IndexError — Anonymous <redmine@...> 2009/09/10

Issue #446 has been updated by Anonymous.

[#18310] [Bug #447] [PATCH] Net::HTTPHeaders iterator methods should return Enumerators — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Bug #447: [PATCH] Net::HTTPHeaders iterator methods should return Enumerators

2 messages 2008/08/15
[#25558] [Bug #447](Closed) [PATCH] Net::HTTPHeaders iterator methods should return Enumerators — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/13

Issue #447 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#18312] [Bug #448] URI::join does not concatenate all strings passed in — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Bug #448: URI::join does not concatenate all strings passed in

2 messages 2008/08/15
[#21845] [Bug #448](Rejected) URI::join does not concatenate all strings passed in — akira yamada <redmine@...> 2009/02/05

Issue #448 has been updated by akira yamada.

[#18314] [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Bug #449: File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows

8 messages 2008/08/15
[#18315] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/16

Hi,
[#18325] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — "John Lam (IRONRUBY)" <jflam@...> 2008/08/18

I submitted that original bug (first time using redmine :)). Here's some mo=
[#18326] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/18

Hi,
[#18327] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — "John Lam (IRONRUBY)" <jflam@...> 2008/08/18

Not at all - it means we're now free to do the right thing :)
[#18328] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/08/18

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:45 PM, John Lam (IRONRUBY)
[#18329] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/18

Hi,
[#18331] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/08/18

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#18317] 1.8.7 Broken!! — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

1 message 2008/08/16

[#18318] OOPS -- 1.8.7 Compiles in spite of autoconf? — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

1 message 2008/08/16

[#18319] NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

14 messages 2008/08/16
[#18321] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/18

Hi,
[#18322] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/08/18

[#18323] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "michael greenly" <mgreenly@...> 2008/08/18

Are you sure you didn't mean to use "~/oracle/bin"
[#18324] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/08/18

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:56 PM, michael greenly <mgreenly@gmail.com> wrote:
[#18330] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/18

Hi,
[#18333] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/08/19

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#18332] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/08/19

Trans wrote:
[#18339] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/08/19

[#18343] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/08/19

[#18344] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "Pit Capitain" <pit.capitain@...> 2008/08/19

2008/8/19 Trans <transfire@gmail.com>:
[#18345] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — Matthew Boeh <mboeh@...> 2008/08/19

On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 04:39:45AM +0900, Pit Capitain wrote:
[#18346] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "Pit Capitain" <pit.capitain@...> 2008/08/19

2008/8/19 Matthew Boeh <mboeh@desperance.net>:
[#18334] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/08/19

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#18335] [Bug #454] URI does not follow the last rfc about uri syntax — Cyrille Faucheux <redmine@...>

Bug #454: URI does not follow the last rfc about uri syntax

3 messages 2008/08/19
[#20661] [Bug #454] URI does not follow the last rfc about uri syntax — Jonas Witt <redmine@...> 2008/12/18

Issue #454 has been updated by Jonas Witt.
[#21846] [Bug #454](Rejected) URI does not follow the last rfc about uri syntax — akira yamada <redmine@...> 2009/02/05

Issue #454 has been updated by akira yamada.

[#18336] The new concept of 'trust' — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

I've been looking through the new concept of 'trust' in Ruby 1.9, and

4 messages 2008/08/19
[#18338] Re: The new concept of 'trust' — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...> 2008/08/19

Hi,
[#18341] Re: The new concept of 'trust' — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/08/19

[#18352] Re: The new concept of 'trust' — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...> 2008/08/20

Hi,

[#18337] [Bug #455] Array#sample(n) loops if a > arr.size — Dave Thomas <redmine@...>

Bug #455: Array#sample(n) loops if a > arr.size

1 message 2008/08/19

[#18340] [Bug #456] Ruby 1.8.6p230 SEGV on OpenSolaris — Prashant Srinivasan <redmine@...>

Bug #456: Ruby 1.8.6p230 SEGV on OpenSolaris

1 message 2008/08/19

[#18342] [Bug #456] Ruby 1.8.6p230 SEGV on OpenSolaris — Federico Builes <redmine@...>

Issue #456 has been updated by Federico Builes.

1 message 2008/08/19

[#18347] [Bug #457] Is irb/xmp supported in 1.9? — Dave Thomas <redmine@...>

Bug #457: Is irb/xmp supported in 1.9?

1 message 2008/08/19

[#18348] [Bug #456] Ruby 1.8.6p230 SEGV on OpenSolaris — Prashant Srinivasan <redmine@...>

Issue #456 has been updated by Prashant Srinivasan.

1 message 2008/08/20

[#18349] [Feature:1.9] autoload with a block — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2008/08/20
[#18799] [Feature #462](Rejected) autoload with a block — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2008/09/23

Issue #462 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#18350] [Bug:1.8] Re: Hard question: Any ideas why this code leaks memory? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2008/08/20
[#19143] [Bug #461] Re: Hard question: Any ideas why this code leaks memory? — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2008/10/06

Issue #461 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#32558] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#461][Feedback] Re: Hard question: Any ideas why this code leaks memory? — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2010/09/25

Issue #461 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#18351] [Bug #455](Closed) Array#sample(n) loops if a > arr.size — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...>

Issue #455 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

1 message 2008/08/20

[#18353] [Bug #458] Range#dup returns incorrect results — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Bug #458: Range#dup returns incorrect results

1 message 2008/08/20

[#18354] Retrieving bytecode for method — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2008/08/20
[#18359] Re: Retrieving bytecode for method — David Majda <david@...> 2008/08/21

Michael Neumann napsal(a):
[#18360] Re: Retrieving bytecode for method — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2008/08/21

David Majda wrote:
[#18362] Re: Retrieving bytecode for method — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2008/08/21

Michael Neumann wrote:

[#18355] [Bug #459] Scanf Seems to Have Issues with Single Digit Integers — James Gray <redmine@...>

Bug #459: Scanf Seems to Have Issues with Single Digit Integers

1 message 2008/08/20

[#18356] [Bug #459] Scanf Seems to Have Issues with Single Digit Integers — James Gray <redmine@...>

Issue #459 has been updated by James Gray.

1 message 2008/08/20

[#18357] [Bug #459](Closed) Scanf Seems to Have Issues with Single Digit Integers — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...>

Issue #459 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

1 message 2008/08/20

[#18358] [Bug #458] Range#dup returns incorrect results — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...>

Issue #458 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

1 message 2008/08/20

[#18361] Ruby popen bug #1, isolated — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...>

Hello

2 messages 2008/08/21
[#18363] Re: Ruby popen bug #1, isolated — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2008/08/21

On 21/08/2008, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@centrum.cz> wrote:

[#18364] popen IO bug #2, isolated — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...>

OK, here goes a reorganization of the code that looks a bit simpler:

2 messages 2008/08/21
[#18371] Re: popen IO bug #2, isolated — Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@...> 2008/08/22

Michal Suchanek wrote:

[#18368] [Bug #472] No ord in Net::HTTP#urlencode — Junegunn Choi <redmine@...>

Bug #472: No ord in Net::HTTP#urlencode

2 messages 2008/08/22
[#18376] [Bug #472](Closed) No ord in Net::HTTP#urlencode — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...> 2008/08/24

Issue #472 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.

[#18369] [Bug #473] File.chmod does not validate the permission attribute — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Bug #473: File.chmod does not validate the permission attribute

3 messages 2008/08/22
[#18372] Re: [Bug #473] File.chmod does not validate the permission attribute — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/23

Hi,
[#18473] [Bug #473](Rejected) File.chmod does not validate the permission attribute — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2008/09/06

Issue #473 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#18370] [Feature #474] Hash#<< — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Feature #474: Hash#<<

4 messages 2008/08/22
[#18392] Re: [Feature #474] Hash#<< — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/27

Hi,
[#18393] Re: [Feature #474] Hash#<< — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/08/27

[#19108] [Feature #474](Rejected) Hash#<< — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2008/10/02

Issue #474 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#18373] popen IO bug #3 - comment makes code behave differently XD — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...>

Hello

1 message 2008/08/23

[#18374] [Feature #481] improved gcd for 1.9 — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Feature #481: improved gcd for 1.9

2 messages 2008/08/23
[#18999] [Feature #481](Rejected) improved gcd for 1.9 — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2008/09/28

Issue #481 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.

[#18375] Stack "Overflow" Patch — Jonathan deWerd <jjoonathan@...>

In my spare time, I've been working on a OSX InputManager that =20

1 message 2008/08/23

[#18377] [Bug #484] OpenSSL::Config does not freeze correctly — Drake Wilson <redmine@...>

Bug #484: OpenSSL::Config does not freeze correctly

6 messages 2008/08/24
[#18378] [Bug #484] OpenSSL::Config does not freeze correctly — Drake Wilson <redmine@...> 2008/08/24

Issue #484 has been updated by Drake Wilson.
[#25742] [Bug #484] OpenSSL::Config does not freeze correctly — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/24

Issue #484 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#25741] [Bug #484](Closed) OpenSSL::Config does not freeze correctly — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/24

Issue #484 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.
[#26795] [Backport #484](Assigned) OpenSSL::Config does not freeze correctly — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/11/18

Issue #484 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
[#30399] [Backport #484](Closed) OpenSSL::Config does not freeze correctly — Kirk Haines <redmine@...> 2010/05/24

Issue #484 has been updated by Kirk Haines.

[#18379] [Bug #488] Segfault on unrescued infinite recursion — Omari Stephens <redmine@...>

Bug #488: Segfault on unrescued infinite recursion

2 messages 2008/08/24
[#18380] [Bug #488] Segfault on unrescued infinite recursion — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2008/08/25

Issue #488 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#18381] [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #496: DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow

11 messages 2008/08/25
[#21019] [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2008/12/31

Issue #496 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#21022] [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2008/12/31

Issue #496 has been updated by Roger Pack.
[#21028] Re: [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/12/31

[#18382] Re: [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/08/25

Hongli Lai wrote:
[#18399] [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Brian Candler <redmine@...> 2008/08/27

Issue #496 has been updated by Brian Candler.
[#18400] [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2008/08/27

Issue #496 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#18448] [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Brian Candler <redmine@...> 2008/09/04

Issue #496 has been updated by Brian Candler.
[#18451] [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Hongli Lai <redmine@...> 2008/09/04

Issue #496 has been updated by Hongli Lai.
[#29496] [Bug #496](Feedback) DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/04/13

Issue #496 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.
[#29517] [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2010/04/14

Issue #496 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#18383] RCR: instance_methods(ancestor) — Trans <transfire@...>

I'm wondering if anyone here saw this post on ruby-talk. It's seem

1 message 2008/08/25

[#18384] New Command Revisted — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Matz,

3 messages 2008/08/25
[#18385] Re: New Command Revisted — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/26

Hi,
[#18386] Re: New Command Revisted — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/08/26

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#18387] [Bug:1.9] rubygems fails to cache spec file — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...>

Hi,

6 messages 2008/08/26
[#20456] [Bug #501] rubygems fails to cache spec file — Yuki Sonoda <redmine@...> 2008/12/11

Issue #501 has been updated by Yuki Sonoda.
[#20487] [Bug #501](Closed) rubygems fails to cache spec file — Eric Hodel <redmine@...> 2008/12/11

Issue #501 has been updated by Eric Hodel.
[#18389] Re: [Bug:1.9] rubygems fails to cache spec file — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2008/08/26

In article <e0b1e5700808260950s79665563h3615a7af3ad4cc0b@mail.gmail.com>,
[#18390] Re: [Bug:1.9] rubygems fails to cache spec file — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...> 2008/08/26

Hi,
[#18391] Re: [Bug:1.9] rubygems fails to cache spec file — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/08/26

On Aug 26, 2008, at 10:13 AM, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:

[#18394] [Bug #504] Tempfile.open should return the new tempfile rather than nil — Tyler Rick <redmine@...>

Bug #504: Tempfile.open should return the new tempfile rather than nil

4 messages 2008/08/27
[#18401] [Bug #504] Tempfile.open should return the new tempfile rather than nil — Gregory Brown <redmine@...> 2008/08/27

Issue #504 has been updated by Gregory Brown.
[#18395] [Bug #504] Tempfile.open should return the new tempfile rather than nil — Tyler Rick <redmine@...> 2008/08/27

Issue #504 has been updated by Tyler Rick.
[#18789] [Feature #504](Closed) Tempfile.open should return the new tempfile rather than nil — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2008/09/22

Issue #504 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#18396] problems with test_io.rb on cygwin — Martin Duerst <duerst@...>

I have run into problems with test_io.rb on cygwin.

6 messages 2008/08/27
[#18397] Re: problems with test_io.rb on cygwin — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2008/08/27

Hello,
[#18398] revision.h not updated? (was: Re: Re: problems with test_io.rb on cygwin) — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/08/27

At 18:25 08/08/27, U.Nakamura wrote:
[#18431] Re: revision.h not updated? (was: Re: Re: problems with test_io.rb on cygwin) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/09/01

Hi,
[#18619] Re: revision.h not updated? (was: Re: Re: problems with test_io.rb on cygwin) — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/09/16

Hello Nobu,
[#18630] Re: revision.h not updated? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/09/16

Hi,

[#18402] Re: [Feature #474] Hash#<< — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

> module Enumerable

2 messages 2008/08/27
[#18403] Re: [Feature #474] Hash#<< — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/08/27

On Aug 27, 9:32=A0am, Brian Candler <B.Cand...@pobox.com> wrote:

[#18405] [Bug #512] String#% behavior — Federico Builes <redmine@...>

Bug #512: String#% behavior

7 messages 2008/08/27
[#18406] [Bug #512] String#% behavior — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2008/08/27

Issue #512 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#18407] [Bug #512] String#% behavior — Eero Saynatkari <redmine@...> 2008/08/27

Issue #512 has been updated by Eero Saynatkari.
[#18408] [Bug #512] String#% behavior — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2008/08/27

Issue #512 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#18417] [Bug #512] String#% behavior — Eero Saynatkari <redmine@...> 2008/08/28

Issue #512 has been updated by Eero Saynatkari.
[#18418] Re: [Bug #512] String#% behavior — Rolando Abarca <funkaster@...> 2008/08/28

On 28-08-2008, at 10:50, Eero Saynatkari wrote:
[#18419] [Bug #512] String#% behavior — Eero Saynatkari <redmine@...> 2008/08/28

Issue #512 has been updated by Eero Saynatkari.

[#18409] ruby-lang.org has old download links — Nate_Wiger@...

The download links here:

3 messages 2008/08/27
[#18410] Re: ruby-lang.org has old download links — James Gray <james@...> 2008/08/27

On Aug 27, 2008, at 6:04 PM, Nate_Wiger@playstation.sony.com wrote:
[#18421] Re: ruby-lang.org has old download links — Nate_Wiger@... 2008/08/28

>On Aug 27, 2008, at 6:04 PM, Nate_Wiger@playstation.sony.com wrote:

[#18411] [Bug #514] OpenSSL::OCSP::Response's to_der always returns an empty string — Chris Chandler <redmine@...>

Bug #514: OpenSSL::OCSP::Response's to_der always returns an empty string

2 messages 2008/08/28
[#25699] [Bug #514](Closed) OpenSSL::OCSP::Response's to_der always returns an empty string — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/21

Issue #514 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#18413] Re: [Feature #474] Hash#<< — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

> Not this case. String is no longer Enumerable.

3 messages 2008/08/28
[#18425] Re: [Feature #474] Hash#<< — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/08/31

[#18432] Re: [Feature #474] Hash#<< — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...> 2008/09/01

> If you are a well practiced user of Ruby, I think that qualifies you.

[#18414] DoS vulnerability in REXML — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2008/08/28
[#18423] Re: DoS vulnerability in REXML — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/08/29

On Aug 28, 2008, at 02:48 AM, Shugo Maeda wrote:
[#18433] Re: DoS vulnerability in REXML — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...> 2008/09/01

Hello,
[#18544] Re: DoS vulnerability in REXML — "Richard Brown" <rbrown@...> 2008/09/10

On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 14:38, Shugo Maeda <shugo@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#18568] Re: DoS vulnerability in REXML — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...> 2008/09/13

Hello,

[#18415] Re: [Bug #512] String#% behavior — Lars Christensen <larsch@...>

&gt; It's an implementation detail.

1 message 2008/08/28

[#18424] [Bug #528] Several ruby-mode.el improvements — Nathan Weizenbaum <redmine@...>

Bug #528: Several ruby-mode.el improvements

8 messages 2008/08/31
[#18480] [Bug #528](Closed) Several ruby-mode.el improvements — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2008/09/06

Issue #528 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
[#18477] [Bug #528] Several ruby-mode.el improvements — Nathan Weizenbaum <redmine@...> 2008/09/06

Issue #528 has been updated by Nathan Weizenbaum.
[#18478] Re: [Bug #528] Several ruby-mode.el improvements — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/09/06

Hi,
[#18470] [Bug #528] Several ruby-mode.el improvements — Nathan Weizenbaum <redmine@...> 2008/09/06

Issue #528 has been updated by Nathan Weizenbaum.
[#18472] Re: [Bug #528] Several ruby-mode.el improvements — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/09/06

Hi,
[#18475] [Bug #528] Several ruby-mode.el improvements — Nathan Weizenbaum <redmine@...> 2008/09/06

Issue #528 has been updated by Nathan Weizenbaum.
[#18476] Re: [Bug #528] Several ruby-mode.el improvements — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/09/06

Hi,

[#18426] OpenStruct Patch — Trans <transfire@...>

Sun Aug 31 20:49:42 2008 Thomas Sawyer <transfire@gmail.com>

3 messages 2008/08/31
[#18427] Re: OpenStruct Patch — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/08/31

There's a typo in the rdoc for #new: "combine" should be "combined."
[#18577] Re: OpenStruct Patch — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/09/14

On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Trans <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:

[#18428] [Bug #530] socket.c: TCPSocket registered with wrong arity — Mike Furr <redmine@...>

Bug #530: socket.c: TCPSocket registered with wrong arity

2 messages 2008/08/31
[#18429] [Bug #530] socket.c: TCPSocket registered with wrong arity — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2008/08/31

Issue #530 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[ruby-core:18213] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #413] main() needs to return int

From: Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...>
Date: 2008-08-09 02:03:13 UTC
List: ruby-core #18213 
Issue #413 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.


No, not really.

Fact (1)

When abbreviated, a function's return value defaults to int. So,
  main(int, char*);
is a 100% conforming declaration of main function for C89.

Fact (2)

IEEE Std 1003.1 says in its rationale:
  "Implementations are required to support the two-argument calling
  sequence, but this does not prohibit an implementation from
  supporting envp as an optional third argument."
So optional third argument of main is not a bad habit.
----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/413

----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread

Prev Next