[#18121] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #405] (Open) ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #405 has been reported by Anonymous.

14 messages 2008/08/04

[#18130] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

> Seriously though... Array.first is a noun.

10 messages 2008/08/05

[#18319] NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

14 messages 2008/08/16
[#18321] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/18

Hi,

[#18381] [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #496: DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow

11 messages 2008/08/25

[ruby-core:18263] Am I right that this is wrong?

From: "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Date: 2008-08-13 13:33:18 UTC
List: ruby-core #18263
Hi --

  *  call-seq:
  *     mod.instance_methods(include_super=true)   => array
  *
  *  Returns an array containing the names of public instance methods
  *  in the receiver. For a module, these are the public methods; for a
  *  class, they are the instance (not singleton) methods. With no
  *  argument, or with an argument that is <code>false</code>, the
  *  instance methods in <i>mod</i> are returned, otherwise the methods
  *  in <i>mod</i> and <i>mod</i>'s superclasses are returned.

Since include_super defaults to true, I believe the "With no argument"
statement is wrong. These arbitrary boolean arguments are definitely
confusing, so I just wanted to make sure I'm right that it's wrong.


David

-- 
Rails training from David A. Black and Ruby Power and Light:
  *  Advancing With Rails    August 18-21    Edison, NJ
  * Co-taught by D.A. Black and Erik Kastner
See http://www.rubypal.com for details and updates!

In This Thread

Prev Next