[#18042] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — gdefty@...
Hi,
[#18052] Enumerators that know about a block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#18086] Suggestion to change Time#to_s format to an official standard — Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...>
Hello people,
[#18110] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #403] (Open) Add support to Haiku — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Issue #403 has been reported by Anonymous.
[#18121] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #405] (Open) ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Issue #405 has been reported by Anonymous.
[#18130] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>
> Seriously though... Array.first is a noun.
[#18145] [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal" — Otto Hilska <otto.hilska@...>
Hi,
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 15:48, Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net> wrote:
[#18164] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — gdefty@...
In message "Re: [ruby-core:18133] Re: New array
[#18237] Severe problem with garbage collection — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
[#18247] Thread#priority(=) will be obsolete — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
[#18252] Re: result for mget [last:10 MIME/multipart] (1/1) (ruby-core ML) — "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@...>
>> We are planning to make Thread#priority(=) method as obsolete method
Hi,
[#18257] Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>
Hi, all.
HI! This answers the question that I asked a few days ago, thank you!
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#18263] Am I right that this is wrong? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
Hi,
Hi --
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:04 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#18303] Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization — kevin nolan <kpnolan@...>
After compiling Ruby 1.8.6 with '-O3 -mtune=K8 -march=K8' on an AMD 4800
kevin nolan:
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 03:39 +0900, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) wrote:
[#18314] [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Bug #449: File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows
Hi,
I submitted that original bug (first time using redmine :)). Here's some mo=
Hi,
Not at all - it means we're now free to do the right thing :)
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:45 PM, John Lam (IRONRUBY)
[#18319] NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
Core,
Hi,
Are you sure you didn't mean to use "~/oracle/bin"
Trans wrote:
[#18349] [Feature:1.9] autoload with a block — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
Hi,
[#18354] Retrieving bytecode for method — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
Hi,
[#18381] [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>
Bug #496: DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow
[#18387] [Bug:1.9] rubygems fails to cache spec file — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...>
Hi,
[#18396] problems with test_io.rb on cygwin — Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
I have run into problems with test_io.rb on cygwin.
Hello,
[#18405] [Bug #512] String#% behavior — Federico Builes <redmine@...>
Bug #512: String#% behavior
[#18409] ruby-lang.org has old download links — Nate_Wiger@...
The download links here:
[#18414] DoS vulnerability in REXML — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...>
Hi,
[#18424] [Bug #528] Several ruby-mode.el improvements — Nathan Weizenbaum <redmine@...>
Bug #528: Several ruby-mode.el improvements
[ruby-core:18239] Re: Severe problem with garbage collection
Bertram Scharpf wrote: > Hi, > > I have a really large amount of data here and a Ruby program > dealing with it. I noticed how this program started to use swap > space and then, hours later, terminated. Then I watched (Linux > here) "/proc/$$/statm". Yes, the whole memory was eaten up. > > I know that my program does not have a bug because it is running > for a year now without complaint. So I downgraded my Ruby from > 1.8.6_p230 to 1.8.6_p111 and--voila--the statm output yields > constant values and the program finishes successfully. > > Sorry, I cannot provide any data because it is from a lawyers > office and underlies duty of confidentially. I would search on my > own for the bug if someone could give me a hint where to start > doing this. Hi, I'd start with looking at the changes between 1.8.6_p230 and _p111 to file gc.c. Should be pretty easy to extract those changes using "svn diff". You could also compare the number of allocated objects (using class ObjectSpace) for both Ruby versions when your program is running. Maybe there is an anormaly. You could as well try your program with Ruby 1.9? Maybe it runs. Maybe it exhibits the same problem. Or do a binary search over the Ruby versions. Try 1.8.6_p220. If it works, try 1.8.6_p225, until you find the version which introduced the "bug". Then use diff to track down the bug even further. Regards, Michael