[#18042] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — gdefty@...
Hi,
[#18052] Enumerators that know about a block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#18086] Suggestion to change Time#to_s format to an official standard — Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...>
Hello people,
[#18110] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #403] (Open) Add support to Haiku — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Issue #403 has been reported by Anonymous.
[#18121] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #405] (Open) ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Issue #405 has been reported by Anonymous.
[#18130] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>
> Seriously though... Array.first is a noun.
[#18145] [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal" — Otto Hilska <otto.hilska@...>
Hi,
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 15:48, Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net> wrote:
[#18164] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — gdefty@...
In message "Re: [ruby-core:18133] Re: New array
[#18237] Severe problem with garbage collection — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
[#18247] Thread#priority(=) will be obsolete — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
[#18252] Re: result for mget [last:10 MIME/multipart] (1/1) (ruby-core ML) — "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@...>
>> We are planning to make Thread#priority(=) method as obsolete method
Hi,
[#18257] Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>
Hi, all.
HI! This answers the question that I asked a few days ago, thank you!
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#18263] Am I right that this is wrong? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
Hi,
Hi --
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:04 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#18303] Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization — kevin nolan <kpnolan@...>
After compiling Ruby 1.8.6 with '-O3 -mtune=K8 -march=K8' on an AMD 4800
kevin nolan:
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 03:39 +0900, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) wrote:
[#18314] [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Bug #449: File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows
Hi,
I submitted that original bug (first time using redmine :)). Here's some mo=
Hi,
Not at all - it means we're now free to do the right thing :)
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:45 PM, John Lam (IRONRUBY)
[#18319] NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
Core,
Hi,
Are you sure you didn't mean to use "~/oracle/bin"
Trans wrote:
[#18349] [Feature:1.9] autoload with a block — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
Hi,
[#18354] Retrieving bytecode for method — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
Hi,
[#18381] [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>
Bug #496: DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow
[#18387] [Bug:1.9] rubygems fails to cache spec file — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...>
Hi,
[#18396] problems with test_io.rb on cygwin — Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
I have run into problems with test_io.rb on cygwin.
Hello,
[#18405] [Bug #512] String#% behavior — Federico Builes <redmine@...>
Bug #512: String#% behavior
[#18409] ruby-lang.org has old download links — Nate_Wiger@...
The download links here:
[#18414] DoS vulnerability in REXML — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...>
Hi,
[#18424] [Bug #528] Several ruby-mode.el improvements — Nathan Weizenbaum <redmine@...>
Bug #528: Several ruby-mode.el improvements
[ruby-core:18050] Re: finalizers in 1.8 no longer run after gc_sweep()
Hi,
At Fri, 1 Aug 2008 16:14:45 +0900,
Eric Hodel wrote in [ruby-core:18045]:
>
> This was brought up by Roger Pack in [ruby-talk:309757].
>
> In 1.6, a finalizer would run immediately after the garbage collector
> collected an object. Now they are no longer run until the process
> terminates or an explicit GC.start is run:
It is problematic.
> I would expect the finalized line to print before the collected line
> at all times. This is no longer true.
But your expectation is based on incorrect assumption.
Finalizers will run at an arbitrary time after the object was
collected and before the program terminates, not soon.
Index: rubysig.h
===================================================================
--- rubysig.h (revision 18303)
+++ rubysig.h (working copy)
@@ -80,8 +80,10 @@ void rb_trap_restore_mask _((void));
RUBY_EXTERN int rb_thread_critical;
void rb_thread_schedule _((void));
+void rb_gc_finalize_deferred _((void));
#if defined(HAVE_SETITIMER) || defined(_THREAD_SAFE)
RUBY_EXTERN int rb_thread_pending;
# define CHECK_INTS do {\
if (!(rb_prohibit_interrupt || rb_thread_critical)) {\
+ rb_gc_finalize_deferred();\
if (rb_thread_pending) rb_thread_schedule();\
if (rb_trap_pending) rb_trap_exec();\
@@ -94,4 +96,5 @@ RUBY_EXTERN int rb_thread_tick;
#define CHECK_INTS do {\
if (!(rb_prohibit_interrupt || rb_thread_critical)) {\
+ rb_gc_finalize_deferred();\
if (rb_thread_tick-- <= 0) {\
rb_thread_tick = THREAD_TICK;\
--
Nobu Nakada