[#18042] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — gdefty@...
Hi,
[#18052] Enumerators that know about a block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
[#18086] Suggestion to change Time#to_s format to an official standard — Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...>
Hello people,
[#18110] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #403] (Open) Add support to Haiku — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Issue #403 has been reported by Anonymous.
[#18121] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #405] (Open) ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Issue #405 has been reported by Anonymous.
[#18130] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>
> Seriously though... Array.first is a noun.
[#18145] [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal" — Otto Hilska <otto.hilska@...>
Hi,
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 15:48, Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net> wrote:
[#18164] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — gdefty@...
In message "Re: [ruby-core:18133] Re: New array
[#18237] Severe problem with garbage collection — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
[#18247] Thread#priority(=) will be obsolete — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
[#18252] Re: result for mget [last:10 MIME/multipart] (1/1) (ruby-core ML) — "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@...>
>> We are planning to make Thread#priority(=) method as obsolete method
Hi,
[#18257] Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>
Hi, all.
HI! This answers the question that I asked a few days ago, thank you!
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#18263] Am I right that this is wrong? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
Hi,
Hi --
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:04 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#18303] Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization — kevin nolan <kpnolan@...>
After compiling Ruby 1.8.6 with '-O3 -mtune=K8 -march=K8' on an AMD 4800
kevin nolan:
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 03:39 +0900, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) wrote:
[#18314] [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Bug #449: File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows
Hi,
I submitted that original bug (first time using redmine :)). Here's some mo=
Hi,
Not at all - it means we're now free to do the right thing :)
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:45 PM, John Lam (IRONRUBY)
[#18319] NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
Core,
Hi,
Are you sure you didn't mean to use "~/oracle/bin"
Trans wrote:
[#18349] [Feature:1.9] autoload with a block — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
Hi,
[#18354] Retrieving bytecode for method — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
Hi,
[#18381] [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>
Bug #496: DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow
[#18387] [Bug:1.9] rubygems fails to cache spec file — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...>
Hi,
[#18396] problems with test_io.rb on cygwin — Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
I have run into problems with test_io.rb on cygwin.
Hello,
[#18405] [Bug #512] String#% behavior — Federico Builes <redmine@...>
Bug #512: String#% behavior
[#18409] ruby-lang.org has old download links — Nate_Wiger@...
The download links here:
[#18414] DoS vulnerability in REXML — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...>
Hi,
[#18424] [Bug #528] Several ruby-mode.el improvements — Nathan Weizenbaum <redmine@...>
Bug #528: Several ruby-mode.el improvements
[ruby-core:18148] Re: [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal"
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At Wed, 6 Aug 2008 20:16:00 +0900,
> Otto Hilska wrote in [ruby-core:18145]:
>> Since most other Ruby classes have a name with the first letter in
>> uppercase, I think "fatal" should be no exception.
>
> Ruby scripts should not use it.
>
It's still available for the scripts. For example, running in Rails
environment:
>> Object.subclasses
SyntaxError: (eval):1:in `subclasses_of': compile error
(eval):1: syntax error, unexpected tIDENTIFIER, expecting tCONSTANT
defined?(::fatal) && ::fatal.object_id == k.object_id
^
from
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.0/lib/active_support/core_ext/object/extending.rb:15:in
`subclasses_of'
from
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.0/lib/active_support/core_ext/object/extending.rb:13:in
`eval'
from
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.0/lib/active_support/core_ext/object/extending.rb:15:in
`subclasses_of'
from
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.0/lib/active_support/core_ext/object/extending.rb:13:in
`each_object'
from
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.0/lib/active_support/core_ext/object/extending.rb:13:in
`subclasses_of'
from
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-2.1.0/lib/active_support/core_ext/class/removal.rb:16:in
`subclasses'
from (irb):1
There're some other cases too, where having a class with a lower-case
first letter can cause surprising effects. For me the problem was when
we were importing Ruby sources (and thus all classes) to apidock.com.
If 'fatal' should not be used in scripts, changing the name should not
cause compatibility issues either. So what are the reasons for keeping
it lower-case?
- Otto