[#18121] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #405] (Open) ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #405 has been reported by Anonymous.

14 messages 2008/08/04

[#18130] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

> Seriously though... Array.first is a noun.

10 messages 2008/08/05

[#18319] NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

14 messages 2008/08/16
[#18321] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/18

Hi,

[#18381] [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>

Bug #496: DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow

11 messages 2008/08/25

[ruby-core:18139] Re: Enumerators that know about a block

From: "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...>
Date: 2008-08-06 02:26:18 UTC
List: ruby-core #18139
Hi,

2008/8/6 David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com>:
>> You may need the lazy version of Enumerable#map that returns
>> Enumerator instead of Array.
>>
>>  e = [1, 2, 3].lazy_map {|x| x * 10}
>>  p e.next #=> 10
>>  p e.next #=> 20
>
> Is that an actual method (I couldn't find it anywhere) or just a
> hypothetical example? I'm still wondering why enumerators aren't
> designed to do that automatically if they're given a block upon
> initialization.

It's just a hypothetical example.  Enumerator can't do that automatically,
because Enumerable#map is implemented to produce Array.

If you don't mind memory consumption, you can write like this:

  e = [1, 2, 3].map {|x| x * 10}.each
  p e.next #=> 10
  p e.next #=> 20

-- 
Shugo Maeda

In This Thread