<a class="hover:text-red-600 dark:hover:text-red-400 transition-colors" href="/ruby-core">ruby-core

[#18239] Re: Severe problem with garbage collection — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2008/08/11

[#18237] Severe problem with garbage collection — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2008/08/11

Bertram Scharpf wrote:

[#18238] Re: Severe problem with garbage collection — Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist@...> 2008/08/11

[#18242] Re: Severe problem with garbage collection — "Igal Koshevoy" <igal@...> 2008/08/11

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 3:39 AM, Bertram Scharpf

[#18243] Re: Severe problem with garbage collection — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...> 2008/08/11

Hi,

[#18240] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #417] (Open) pedantic warning/error in header — Peter Bowen <redmine@...>

Issue #417 has been reported by Peter Bowen.

2 messages 2008/08/11

[#25549] [Bug #417](Closed) pedantic warning/error in header — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/13

Issue #417 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#18241] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #418] (Open) date2 library has two methods marked private unnecessarily — Peter Bowen <redmine@...>

Issue #418 has been reported by Peter Bowen.

3 messages 2008/08/11

[#23043] [Bug #418] date2 library has two methods marked private unnecessarily — tadayoshi funaba <redmine@...> 2009/03/28

Issue #418 has been updated by tadayoshi funaba.

[#24840] [Bug #418](Rejected) date2 library has two methods marked private unnecessarily — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2009/08/09

Issue #418 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#18244] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #419] (Open) [PATCH] Hash#default_proc= — Giuseppe Bilotta <redmine@...>

Issue #419 has been reported by Giuseppe Bilotta.

[#18245] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #419] [PATCH] Hash#default_proc= — Giuseppe Bilotta <redmine@...>

Issue #419 has been updated by Giuseppe Bilotta.

[#18246] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Feature #420] (Open) [PATCH] Hash#default_proc= — Giuseppe Bilotta <redmine@...>

Issue #420 has been reported by Giuseppe Bilotta.

[#18251] Re: Thread#priority(=) will be obsolete — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/08/12

[#18247] Thread#priority(=) will be obsolete — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2008/08/12

On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 18:06 +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:

[#18254] Re: Thread#priority(=) will be obsolete — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/08/13

Hi,

[#18489] Re: Thread#priority(=) will be obsolete — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2008/09/08

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:27:14AM +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:

[#18248] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #427] (Open) FileTest return values — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Issue #427 has been reported by Anonymous.

2 messages 2008/08/12

[#18800] [Feature #427](Rejected) FileTest return values — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2008/09/23

Issue #427 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#18252] Re: result for mget [last:10 MIME/multipart] (1/1) (ruby-core ML) — "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@...>

>> We are planning to make Thread#priority(=) method as obsolete method

5 messages 2008/08/12

[#18256] Re: Thread#priority(=) will be obsolete — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2008/08/13

[#18255] Re: result for mget [last:10 MIME/multipart] (1/1) (ruby-core ML) — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/08/13

Hi,

[#18258] Re: result for mget [last:10 MIME/multipart] (1/1) (ruby-core ML) — "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@...> 2008/08/13

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 4:35 AM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:

[#18277] Re: result for mget [last:10 MIME/multipart] (1/1) (ruby-core ML) — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/08/13

Hi,

[#18257] Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>

Hi, all.

7 messages 2008/08/13

[#18259] Re: Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/08/13

On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 13:10 +0900, Yugui (Yuki Sonoda) wrote:

[#18266] Re: Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers — Mohit SIndhwani <rcore_ml@...> 2008/08/13

HI! This answers the question that I asked a few days ago, thank you!

[#18267] Re: Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/13

Hi,

[#18270] Re: Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers — Mohit SIndhwani <rcore_ml@...> 2008/08/13

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#18271] Re: Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/13

Hi,

[#18274] Re: Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers — Mohit Sindhwani <rcore_ml@...> 2008/08/13

Hi Matz

[#18260] [Bug #419](Closed) [PATCH] Hash#default_proc= — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...>

Issue #419 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

1 message 2008/08/13

[#18261] [Feature #420](Closed) [PATCH] Hash#default_proc= — Akinori MUSHA <redmine@...>

Issue #420 has been updated by Akinori MUSHA.

1 message 2008/08/13

[#18262] [Bug #435] open-uri.rb 407 Proxy Authentication Required (OpenURI::HTTPError) — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Bug #435: open-uri.rb 407 Proxy Authentication Required (OpenURI::HTTPError)

2 messages 2008/08/13

[#20868] [Bug #435](Rejected) open-uri.rb 407 Proxy Authentication Required (OpenURI::HTTPError) — Akira Tanaka <redmine@...> 2008/12/25

Issue #435 has been updated by Akira Tanaka.

[#18263] Am I right that this is wrong? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

13 messages 2008/08/13

[#18272] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/13

Hi,

[#18275] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/08/13

Hi --

[#18276] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — "Gregory Brown" <gregory.t.brown@...> 2008/08/13

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:04 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:

[#18278] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/08/13

Hi --

[#18279] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — "Gregory Brown" <gregory.t.brown@...> 2008/08/13

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 5:43 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:

[#18280] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/08/13

[#18281] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/08/14

Hi --

[#18283] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/08/14

[#18286] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/14

Hi,

[#18297] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/08/14

Hi --

[#18268] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — "Gregory Brown" <gregory.t.brown@...> 2008/08/13

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 9:33 AM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:

[#18269] Re: Am I right that this is wrong? — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/08/13

[#18264] [Bug #436] test_list(TestThread) fails on Solaris/x64 — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...>

Bug #436: test_list(TestThread) fails on Solaris/x64

2 messages 2008/08/13

[#18265] [Bug #436](Closed) test_list(TestThread) fails on Solaris/x64 — Shugo Maeda <redmine@...> 2008/08/13

Issue #436 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.

[#18282] Instance methods of a class's singleton class... — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

1 message 2008/08/14

[#18288] [Feature #440] Better introspection for methods (declaring class, arity) — Lasse Koskela <redmine@...>

Feature #440: Better introspection for methods (declaring class, arity)

6 messages 2008/08/14

[#26173] [Feature #440](Feedback) Better introspection for methods (declaring class, arity) — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2009/10/19

Issue #440 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#18784] [Feature #440] Better introspection for methods (declaring class, arity) — Koichi Sasada <redmine@...> 2008/09/22

Issue #440 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.

[#19050] [Feature #440] Better introspection for methods (declaring class, arity) — Lasse Koskela <redmine@...> 2008/09/30

Issue #440 has been updated by Lasse Koskela.

[#19669] [Feature #440] Better introspection for methods (declaring class, arity) — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2008/10/31

Issue #440 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#28849] [Feature #440](Closed) Better introspection for methods (declaring class, arity) — Yusuke Endoh <redmine@...> 2010/03/22

Issue #440 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh.

[#18291] [Bug #441] [PATCH] Hash#default= has wrong rdoc — Giuseppe Bilotta <redmine@...>

Bug #441: [PATCH] Hash#default= has wrong rdoc

3 messages 2008/08/14

[#18294] [Bug #441](Closed) [PATCH] Hash#default= has wrong rdoc — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2008/08/14

Issue #441 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#18292] [Bug #441] [PATCH] Hash#default= has wrong rdoc — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2008/08/14

Issue #441 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#18293] absolute_path() Implementation patch for 1.9 trunk — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

1 message 2008/08/14

[#18298] Heisencallback? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>

Hi --

3 messages 2008/08/14

[#18299] Re: Heisencallback? — Calamitas <calamitates@...> 2008/08/14

On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 3:24 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:

[#18300] Re: Heisencallback? — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/08/14

[#18301] redmine.ruby-lang.org unavailable? — "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@...>

Hello all,

1 message 2008/08/14

[#18303] Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization — kevin nolan <kpnolan@...>

After compiling Ruby 1.8.6 with '-O3 -mtune=K8 -march=K8' on an AMD 4800

7 messages 2008/08/14

[#18313] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization — "Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)" <shot@...> 2008/08/15

kevin nolan:

[#18316] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/08/16

On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 03:39 +0900, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) wrote:

[#18320] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization — Prashant Srinivasan <Prashant.Srinivasan@...> 2008/08/16

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:

[#19396] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization — "Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)" <shot@...> 2008/10/20

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky:

[#19400] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2008/10/20

On 20/10/2008, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) <shot@hot.pl> wrote:

[#18305] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/08/15

On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 02:19 +0900, kevin nolan wrote:

[#18306] [Bug #443] [PATCH] CGI#checkbox_group raises a TypeError when passing false as checked value — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Bug #443: [PATCH] CGI#checkbox_group raises a TypeError when passing false as checked value

[#19002] [Bug #443](Rejected) [PATCH] CGI#checkbox_group raises a TypeError when passing false as checked value — Takeyuki Fujioka <redmine@...> 2008/09/28

Issue #443 has been updated by Takeyuki Fujioka.

[#18307] [Bug #444] [PATCH] CGI#radio_group raises a TypeError when passing false as checked value — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Bug #444: [PATCH] CGI#radio_group raises a TypeError when passing false as checked value

[#19001] [Bug #444](Rejected) [PATCH] CGI#radio_group raises a TypeError when passing false as checked value — Takeyuki Fujioka <redmine@...> 2008/09/28

Issue #444 has been updated by Takeyuki Fujioka.

[#18308] [Bug #445] [PATCH] Net::HTTPHeaders#fetch raises NoMethodError instead of returning default values — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Bug #445: [PATCH] Net::HTTPHeaders#fetch raises NoMethodError instead of returning default values

[#25552] [Bug #445](Closed) [PATCH] Net::HTTPHeaders#fetch raises NoMethodError instead of returning default values — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/13

Issue #445 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#18309] [Bug #446] [PATCH] [DOC] Net::HTTPHeaders#fetch does not return nil but raises IndexError — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Bug #446: [PATCH] [DOC] Net::HTTPHeaders#fetch does not return nil but raises IndexError

[#25520] [Bug #446](Closed) [PATCH] [DOC] Net::HTTPHeaders#fetch does not return nil but raises IndexError — Anonymous <redmine@...> 2009/09/10

Issue #446 has been updated by Anonymous.

[#18310] [Bug #447] [PATCH] Net::HTTPHeaders iterator methods should return Enumerators — Arthur Schreiber <redmine@...>

Bug #447: [PATCH] Net::HTTPHeaders iterator methods should return Enumerators

[#25558] [Bug #447](Closed) [PATCH] Net::HTTPHeaders iterator methods should return Enumerators — Marc-Andre Lafortune <redmine@...> 2009/09/13

Issue #447 has been updated by Marc-Andre Lafortune.

[#18312] [Bug #448] URI::join does not concatenate all strings passed in — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Bug #448: URI::join does not concatenate all strings passed in

[#21845] [Bug #448](Rejected) URI::join does not concatenate all strings passed in — akira yamada <redmine@...> 2009/02/05

Issue #448 has been updated by akira yamada.

[#18314] [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Bug #449: File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows

8 messages 2008/08/15

[#18315] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/16

Hi,

[#18325] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — "John Lam (IRONRUBY)" <jflam@...> 2008/08/18

I submitted that original bug (first time using redmine :)). Here's some more context:

[#18326] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/18

Hi,

[#18327] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — "John Lam (IRONRUBY)" <jflam@...> 2008/08/18

Not at all - it means we're now free to do the right thing :)

[#18328] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/08/18

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:45 PM, John Lam (IRONRUBY)

[#18329] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/18

Hi,

[#18331] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/08/18

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#18317] 1.8.7 Broken!! — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

1 message 2008/08/16

[#18318] OOPS -- 1.8.7 Compiles in spite of autoconf? — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

1 message 2008/08/16

[#18319] NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>

Core,

14 messages 2008/08/16

[#18321] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/08/18

Hi,

[#18322] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/08/18

[#18332] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/08/19

Trans wrote:

[#18339] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — Trans <transfire@...> 2008/08/19

[#18343] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/08/19

[#18344] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "Pit Capitain" <pit.capitain@...> 2008/08/19

2008/8/19 Trans <transfire@gmail.com>:

[#18345] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — Matthew Boeh <mboeh@...> 2008/08/19

On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 04:39:45AM +0900, Pit Capitain wrote:

[#18346] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "Pit Capitain" <pit.capitain@...> 2008/08/19

2008/8/19 Matthew Boeh <mboeh@desperance.net>:

[#18323] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "michael greenly" <mgreenly@...> 2008/08/18

Are you sure you didn't mean to use "~/oracle/bin"

[#18324] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/08/18

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:56 PM, michael greenly <mgreenly@gmail.com> wrote:

[#18330] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/08/18

Hi,

[#18333] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/08/19

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#18334] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...> 2008/08/19

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#18335] [Bug #454] URI does not follow the last rfc about uri syntax — Cyrille Faucheux <redmine@...>

Bug #454: URI does not follow the last rfc about uri syntax

3 messages 2008/08/19

[#20661] [Bug #454] URI does not follow the last rfc about uri syntax — Jonas Witt <redmine@...> 2008/12/18

Issue #454 has been updated by Jonas Witt.

[#21846] [Bug #454](Rejected) URI does not follow the last rfc about uri syntax — akira yamada <redmine@...> 2009/02/05

Issue #454 has been updated by akira yamada.

[#18336] The new concept of 'trust' — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

I've been looking through the new concept of 'trust' in Ruby 1.9, and

4 messages 2008/08/19

[#18338] Re: The new concept of 'trust' — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...> 2008/08/19

Hi,

[#18341] Re: The new concept of 'trust' — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/08/19

[#18352] Re: The new concept of 'trust' — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...> 2008/08/20

Hi,

[#18337] [Bug #455] Array#sample(n) loops if a > arr.size — Dave Thomas <redmine@...>

Bug #455: Array#sample(n) loops if a > arr.size

[#18340] [Bug #456] Ruby 1.8.6p230 SEGV on OpenSolaris — Prashant Srinivasan <redmine@...>

Bug #456: Ruby 1.8.6p230 SEGV on OpenSolaris

[#18342] [Bug #456] Ruby 1.8.6p230 SEGV on OpenSolaris — Federico Builes <redmine@...>

Issue #456 has been updated by Federico Builes.

[#18347] [Bug #457] Is irb/xmp supported in 1.9? — Dave Thomas <redmine@...>

Bug #457: Is irb/xmp supported in 1.9?

[#18348] [Bug #456] Ruby 1.8.6p230 SEGV on OpenSolaris — Prashant Srinivasan <redmine@...>

Issue #456 has been updated by Prashant Srinivasan.

[#18799] [Feature #462](Rejected) autoload with a block — Yukihiro Matsumoto <redmine@...> 2008/09/23

[#18349] [Feature:1.9] autoload with a block — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2008/08/20

Issue #462 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.

[#18350] [Bug:1.8] Re: Hard question: Any ideas why this code leaks memory? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2008/08/20

[#19143] [Bug #461] Re: Hard question: Any ideas why this code leaks memory? — Roger Pack <redmine@...> 2008/10/06

Issue #461 has been updated by Roger Pack.

[#32558] [Ruby 1.8-Bug#461][Feedback] Re: Hard question: Any ideas why this code leaks memory? — Shyouhei Urabe <redmine@...> 2010/09/25

Issue #461 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.

[#18351] [Bug #455](Closed) Array#sample(n) loops if a > arr.size — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...>

Issue #455 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#18353] [Bug #458] Range#dup returns incorrect results — Anonymous <redmine@...>

Bug #458: Range#dup returns incorrect results

[#18359] Re: Retrieving bytecode for method — David Majda <david@...> 2008/08/21

[#18354] Retrieving bytecode for method — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2008/08/20

Michael Neumann napsal(a):

[#18360] Re: Retrieving bytecode for method — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2008/08/21

David Majda wrote:

[#18362] Re: Retrieving bytecode for method — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2008/08/21

Michael Neumann wrote:

[#18355] [Bug #459] Scanf Seems to Have Issues with Single Digit Integers — James Gray <redmine@...>

Bug #459: Scanf Seems to Have Issues with Single Digit Integers

[#18356] [Bug #459] Scanf Seems to Have Issues with Single Digit Integers — James Gray <redmine@...>

Issue #459 has been updated by James Gray.

[#18357] [Bug #459](Closed) Scanf Seems to Have Issues with Single Digit Integers — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...>

Issue #459 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#18358] [Bug #458] Range#dup returns incorrect results — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...>

Issue #458 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.