[#18042] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — gdefty@...
Hi,
3 messages
2008/08/01
[#18052] Enumerators that know about a block — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
8 messages
2008/08/01
[#18086] Suggestion to change Time#to_s format to an official standard — Dirkjan Bussink <d.bussink@...>
Hello people,
5 messages
2008/08/02
[#18110] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #403] (Open) Add support to Haiku — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Issue #403 has been reported by Anonymous.
7 messages
2008/08/03
[#18121] [Ruby 1.8.7 - Bug #405] (Open) ssl.rb:31: [BUG] Bus Error — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Issue #405 has been reported by Anonymous.
14 messages
2008/08/04
[#18130] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>
> Seriously though... Array.first is a noun.
10 messages
2008/08/05
[#18145] [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal" — Otto Hilska <otto.hilska@...>
Hi,
9 messages
2008/08/06
[#18146] Re: [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal"
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/08/06
Hi,
[#18148] Re: [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal"
— Otto Hilska <otto.hilska@...>
2008/08/06
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#18162] Re: [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal"
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/08/07
Hi,
[#18174] Re: [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal"
— "Jeremy Kemper" <jeremy@...>
2008/08/07
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 1:37 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#18180] Re: [PATCH] error.c (Init_Exception): Rename class "fatal" to "Fatal"
— "Daniel Luz" <dev@...>
2008/08/07
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 15:48, Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@bitsweat.net> wrote:
[#18164] Re: New array methods cycle, choice, shuffle (plus bug in cycle) — gdefty@...
In message "Re: [ruby-core:18133] Re: New array
6 messages
2008/08/07
[#18237] Severe problem with garbage collection — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2008/08/11
[#18247] Thread#priority(=) will be obsolete — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
4 messages
2008/08/12
[#18252] Re: result for mget [last:10 MIME/multipart] (1/1) (ruby-core ML) — "Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@...>
>> We are planning to make Thread#priority(=) method as obsolete method
5 messages
2008/08/12
[#18255] Re: result for mget [last:10 MIME/multipart] (1/1) (ruby-core ML)
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2008/08/13
Hi,
[#18257] Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers — "Yugui (Yuki Sonoda)" <yugui@...>
Hi, all.
7 messages
2008/08/13
[#18266] Re: Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers
— Mohit SIndhwani <rcore_ml@...>
2008/08/13
HI! This answers the question that I asked a few days ago, thank you!
[#18267] Re: Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/08/13
Hi,
[#18270] Re: Definition of "Support levels", 1.9.1 supported platforms and recruitment for platform maintainers
— Mohit SIndhwani <rcore_ml@...>
2008/08/13
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#18263] Am I right that this is wrong? — "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
Hi --
13 messages
2008/08/13
[#18272] Re: Am I right that this is wrong?
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/08/13
Hi,
[#18275] Re: Am I right that this is wrong?
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/08/13
Hi --
[#18276] Re: Am I right that this is wrong?
— "Gregory Brown" <gregory.t.brown@...>
2008/08/13
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:04 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#18303] Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization — kevin nolan <kpnolan@...>
After compiling Ruby 1.8.6 with '-O3 -mtune=K8 -march=K8' on an AMD 4800
7 messages
2008/08/14
[#18313] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization
— "Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)" <shot@...>
2008/08/15
kevin nolan:
[#18316] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 yields 50%-100% performance gain when compiled at full optimization
— "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...>
2008/08/16
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 03:39 +0900, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) wrote:
[#18314] [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows — Anonymous <redmine@...>
Bug #449: File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows
8 messages
2008/08/15
[#18315] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/08/16
Hi,
[#18325] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows
— "John Lam (IRONRUBY)" <jflam@...>
2008/08/18
I submitted that original bug (first time using redmine :)). Here's some mo=
[#18326] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/08/18
Hi,
[#18327] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows
— "John Lam (IRONRUBY)" <jflam@...>
2008/08/18
Not at all - it means we're now free to do the right thing :)
[#18328] Re: [Bug #449] File.zero? returns true when given a directory on Windows
— "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>
2008/08/18
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:45 PM, John Lam (IRONRUBY)
[#18319] NEW Command: absolute_path() -- — "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
Core,
14 messages
2008/08/16
[#18321] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() --
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/08/18
Hi,
[#18322] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() --
— Trans <transfire@...>
2008/08/18
[#18323] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() --
— "michael greenly" <mgreenly@...>
2008/08/18
Are you sure you didn't mean to use "~/oracle/bin"
[#18332] Re: NEW Command: absolute_path() --
— "C.E. Thornton" <admin@...>
2008/08/19
Trans wrote:
[#18349] [Feature:1.9] autoload with a block — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
Hi,
2 messages
2008/08/20
[#18354] Retrieving bytecode for method — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
Hi,
4 messages
2008/08/20
[#18381] [Bug #496] DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow — Hongli Lai <redmine@...>
Bug #496: DRb.start_service(nil) is very slow
11 messages
2008/08/25
[#18387] [Bug:1.9] rubygems fails to cache spec file — "Yusuke ENDOH" <mame@...>
Hi,
6 messages
2008/08/26
[#18396] problems with test_io.rb on cygwin — Martin Duerst <duerst@...>
I have run into problems with test_io.rb on cygwin.
6 messages
2008/08/27
[#18397] Re: problems with test_io.rb on cygwin
— "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
2008/08/27
Hello,
[#18405] [Bug #512] String#% behavior — Federico Builes <redmine@...>
Bug #512: String#% behavior
7 messages
2008/08/27
[#18409] ruby-lang.org has old download links — Nate_Wiger@...
The download links here:
3 messages
2008/08/27
[#18414] DoS vulnerability in REXML — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2008/08/28
[#18424] [Bug #528] Several ruby-mode.el improvements — Nathan Weizenbaum <redmine@...>
Bug #528: Several ruby-mode.el improvements
8 messages
2008/08/31
[ruby-core:18182] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #252] Array#sort doesn't respect overridden <=>
From:
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date:
2008-08-07 22:41:27 UTC
List:
ruby-core #18182
Hi,
In message "Re: [ruby-core:18124] Re: [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #252] Array#sort doesn't respect overridden <=>"
on Tue, 5 Aug 2008 04:49:27 +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nutter@sun.com> writes:
|So this is going to be a behavioral change now? My reading of the patch
|tells me it's now checking to see if <=> has been overridden and if so
|using the path that actually calls it. As Ryan pointed out, this would
|be new behavior. Can we get an official ruling on what is correct in 1.8
|and 1.9.x?
We are not going to change 1.8 semantic in the near future. We should
keep compatibility, even when it's inconsistent, as long as it's not
"wrong".
For 1.9, I think it's better to adopt the new behavior. What do you
think?
matz.