[#16611] lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
This is one of those e-mails that I know from the start to be futile, =20=
148 messages
2008/05/01
[#16613] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...>
2008/05/01
T24gV2VkLCBBcHIgMzAsIDIwMDggYXQgMTE6MjYgUE0sIERhdmUgVGhvbWFzIDxkYXZlQHByYWdw
[#16620] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/01
Hi --
[#16631] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2008/05/02
David A. Black wrote:
[#16649] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...>
2008/05/04
wouldn't
[#16661] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2008/05/05
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 12:26:47PM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16662] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/05
Hi --
[#16663] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— ts <decoux@...>
2008/05/05
David A. Black wrote:
[#16664] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/05
Hi --
[#16665] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— ts <decoux@...>
2008/05/05
David A. Black wrote:
[#16666] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2008/05/05
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:02:34AM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
[#16668] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/05
Hi --
[#16682] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— ara howard <ara.t.howard@...>
2008/05/08
[#16683] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/08
Hi --
[#16684] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
2008/05/08
ara howard wrote:
[#16687] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/08
Hi --
[#16691] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...>
2008/05/08
[#16692] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/08
Hi --
[#16695] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...>
2008/05/08
[#16696] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/08
Hi --
[#16705] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
2008/05/11
Not to throw the whole thread into a tizzy again, but why again is:
[#16707] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
2008/05/11
Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#16708] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/05/11
Hi,
[#16709] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/11
Hi --
[#16710] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
2008/05/11
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
[#16720] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/11
Hi,
[#16721] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/12
Hi --
[#16722] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/12
Hi,
[#16723] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
2008/05/12
[#16724] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/12
Hi,
[#16726] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...>
2008/05/12
What about "fn" or "fun", for "function"?
[#16728] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/12
Hi,
[#16731] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
2008/05/12
[#16732] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/12
Hi,
[#16733] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
2008/05/12
[#16759] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/13
Hi --
[#16766] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/14
Hi,
[#16784] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/18
Hi --
[#16795] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Nate_Wiger@...
2008/05/19
On Wed, 14 May 2008, David A. Black wrote:
[#16797] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/19
Hi,
[#16798] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Christopher Gill" <gilltots@...>
2008/05/19
how about an uppercase lambda (instead of the usual lowercase one)
[#16802] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...>
2008/05/20
Christopher Gill wrote:
[#16843] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...>
2008/05/22
Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
[#16844] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/05/22
Hi,
[#16859] Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity (Was: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on)
— "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...>
2008/05/23
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#16862] Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity (Was: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on)
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/05/23
Hi,
[#16846] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
2008/05/22
=20
[#16854] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...>
2008/05/22
T24gVGh1LCBNYXkgMjIsIDIwMDggYXQgNTozNyBQTSwgQmVyZ2VyLCBEYW5pZWwgPERhbmllbC5C
[#16857] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...>
2008/05/23
RXZlbiB0aG91Z2ggSSBzZWUgdGhlIHVzZWZ1bG5lc3MsIHRoYXQncyBqdXN0IHVnbHkuCgotLUpl
[#16874] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Nate_Wiger@...
2008/05/23
"Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@gmail.com> wrote on 05/22/2008 05:35:01=20
[#16875] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...>
2008/05/23
2008/5/23 <Nate_Wiger@playstation.sony.com>:
[#16879] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Tammo Tjarks <tammo@...>
2008/05/24
I am not sure if that fits to the thread. I have not used yet the more
[#16881] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Phlip <phlip2005@...>
2008/05/24
Tammo Tjarks wrote:
[#16883] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/24
Hi --
[#16885] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Phlip <phlip2005@...>
2008/05/25
> assert_yin_yang -> { q += 0 }, 'it broke!', -> { q == 42 }
[#16887] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/25
Hi --
[#16888] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Phlip <phlip2005@...>
2008/05/25
>> assert_yin_yang proc{ q += 0 }, 'it broke!',
[#16627] Monotonic timeofday() — zimbatm <zimbatm@...>
Hi ruby-core.
4 messages
2008/05/01
[#16642] ruby/trunk rev 16276 broken? ib/erb.rb:429:in `initialize': wrong argument type StringScanner (expected true) (TypeError) — Kurt Stephens <ks@...>
Build crashes shortly after miniruby linkage
4 messages
2008/05/02
[#16648] Uniform RDoc markup — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...>
Would there be any resistance to making the markup of the RDoc
9 messages
2008/05/04
[#16760] errors running make test — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...>
I updated to revision 16403 and now compiling and running ruby1.9
4 messages
2008/05/13
[#16772] The RubySpec project at rubyspec.org — Brian Ford <brixen@...>
Hi all,
1 message
2008/05/14
[#16773] Singleton methods on Float and Bignum — Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
In 1.8 (and 1.9 likely), trying to add a singleton method to a Float
8 messages
2008/05/15
[#16775] Re: Singleton methods on Float and Bignum
— Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>
2008/05/15
Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#16788] Ruby 1.8.7-preview3 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Folks,
3 messages
2008/05/18
[#16791] GC heap allocation in 1.9 — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>
While getting the latest of trunk, I stumbled on r16194.
5 messages
2008/05/19
[#16806] nil.instance_eval — ts <decoux@...>
4 messages
2008/05/20
[#16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — Masoom <masoom.shaikh@...>
Hi,
10 messages
2008/05/20
[#16809] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2008/05/20
Hi,
[#16816] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault
— Masoom <masoom.shaikh@...>
2008/05/20
that means current vm is not embeddable ? by min. src I guess you mean the
[#16817] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault
— ts <decoux@...>
2008/05/20
Masoom wrote:
[#16812] Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
8 messages
2008/05/20
[#16820] Re: Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number
— "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>
2008/05/20
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:20 AM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#16822] Re: Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number
— Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>
2008/05/20
Luis Lavena wrote:
[#16832] Who is responsible for Ruby license? — "Han, Kimyung" <Kimyung.Han@...>
I am trying to discuss the ruby license with anyone who is responsible
6 messages
2008/05/21
[#16834] Returning duplicate values from Dir.glob — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>
Hi,
7 messages
2008/05/21
[#16839] ruby autoconf problems — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...>
Hello
6 messages
2008/05/22
[#16864] removal of magical definition of name for some class definition idioms — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>
Dear list
5 messages
2008/05/23
[#16884] block args w/ defaults (was Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Eric Mahurin <eric.mahurin@gmail.com>
4 messages
2008/05/24
[#16925] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (was Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity)
— "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...>
2008/05/26
SGV5IQoKSSd2ZSB0cmllZCB5b3VyIHBhdGNoIGFuZCBoYXZlIHNvbWUgdHJvdWJsZXMuCkkgZXhw
[#16886] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
This patch is an independent but related one to my previous one. It can be
64 messages
2008/05/25
[#16895] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/05/26
Hi,
[#16900] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
2008/05/26
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
[#16901] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/26
Hi,
[#16902] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...>
2008/05/26
Hi,
[#16903] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/26
Hi,
[#16904] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2008/05/26
[#16905] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/26
Hi,
[#16907] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2008/05/26
[#16908] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...>
2008/05/26
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
[#16910] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/26
Hi,
[#16911] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...>
2008/05/26
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>
[#16912] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/26
Hi,
[#16920] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2008/05/26
If I may, here are two entries from the ChangeLog file:
[#16922] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2008/05/26
[#16927] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2008/05/26
Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16928] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2008/05/26
[#16929] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2008/05/26
Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16931] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2008/05/27
[#16946] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2008/05/27
Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16947] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— James Gray <james@...>
2008/05/27
On May 27, 2008, at 12:33 PM, David Flanagan wrote:
[#16949] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2008/05/27
James Gray wrote:
[#16954] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2008/05/27
[#16956] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2008/05/27
Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16961] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...>
2008/05/28
David Flanagan wrote:
[#16967] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/28
Hi,
[#16971] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
2008/05/28
On 5/28/08, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#16990] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/29
Hi,
[#16960] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
2008/05/28
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Eric Mahurin <eric.mahurin@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16921] Major performance degradation on trunk — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2008/05/26
[#16943] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (updated) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
MjAwOC81LzI2IFJhZG9zs2F3IEJ1s2F0IDxyYWRlay5idWxhdEBnbWFpbC5jb20+OgoKPiBIZXkh
5 messages
2008/05/27
[#16945] Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Looking at the source, I'd expect the following to work:
9 messages
2008/05/27
[#16951] Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered" — "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...>
Hi,
8 messages
2008/05/27
[#17133] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered"
— "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...>
2008/06/06
2008/5/27, Paul Boekholt <p.boekholt@gmail.com>:
[#17199] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered"
— "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...>
2008/06/10
2008/6/6, Paul Boekholt <p.boekholt@gmail.com>:
[#17227] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered"
— "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...>
2008/06/11
> 2008/6/6, Paul Boekholt <p.boekholt@gmail.com>:
[#16953] 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem — Christopher Thompson <cthompson@...>
Warning: This message is probably only peripherally related to Ruby!
8 messages
2008/05/27
[#16970] Re: 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem
— "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...>
2008/05/28
I used to catch Errno::EINVAL when using lots of open file descriptors
[#16955] ruby-mode.el copyright assignment — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...>
6 messages
2008/05/27
[#17022] Re: ruby-mode.el copyright assignment
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/05/31
Hi,
[#16979] Array.nitems replacement? — David Flanagan <david@...>
Array.nitems has just been removed from 1.9, and as near as I can make
8 messages
2008/05/28
[#16984] ZLIB for MSVC 8 - tar_input.rb — "Giancarlo F Bellido" <support@...>
I managed to install wxruby and compile zlib extension using this patch in
5 messages
2008/05/29
[#16986] Re: [PATCH] ZLIB for MSVC 8 - tar_input.rb
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2008/05/29
On May 28, 2008, at 19:48 PM, Giancarlo F Bellido wrote:
[#17010] unexpected return using define_method — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
Is this a bug?
8 messages
2008/05/30
[#17012] Re: unexpected return using define_method
— ts <decoux@...>
2008/05/30
Paul Brannan wrote:
[#17014] Re: unexpected return using define_method
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2008/05/30
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 06:10:25PM +0900, ts wrote:
[#17015] Re: unexpected return using define_method
— ts <decoux@...>
2008/05/30
Paul Brannan wrote:
[#17028] Ruby 1.8.7 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Folks,
10 messages
2008/05/31
[#17033] Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken
— "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...>
2008/06/01
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 12:25:08AM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17042] Re: Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken
— "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
2008/06/02
At Mon, 2 Jun 2008 06:37:21 +0900,
[#17044] Re: Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken
— "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...>
2008/06/02
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 03:46:53PM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17030] Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9 — Adam Strzelecki <ono@...>
Hello,
8 messages
2008/05/31
[#17119] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9
— Adam Strzelecki <ono@...>
2008/06/05
Hello again,
[#17121] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2008/06/05
Hi,
[#17122] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9
— Adam Strzelecki <ono@...>
2008/06/05
> to_ary() convert ISeq object to Array and well known objects such as
Re: Array.nitems replacement?
From:
David Flanagan <david@...>
Date:
2008-05-28 20:16:25 UTC
List:
ruby-core #16980
I've attached a patch to alter Enumerable#count and Array#count so that when invoked with no argument and no block they behave like the Array#nitems method of Ruby 1.8: they count non-nil items instead of returning an Enumerator. David
Attachments (1)
patch
(2.45 KB, text/x-diff)
Index: array.c
===================================================================
--- array.c (revision 16676)
+++ array.c (working copy)
@@ -2749,9 +2749,12 @@
* call-seq:
* array.count(obj) -> int
* array.count { |item| block } -> int
+ * array.count -> int
*
* Returns the number of elements which equals to <i>obj</i>.
- * If a block is given, counts tthe number of elements yielding a true value.
+ * If a block is given, counts the number of elements yielding a true value.
+ * If no argument or block is given, returns the number of non-nil items
+ * (false is considered non-nil).
*
* ary = [1, 2, 4, 2]
* ary.count(2) # => 2
@@ -2767,11 +2770,16 @@
if (argc == 0) {
VALUE *p, *pend;
- RETURN_ENUMERATOR(ary, 0, 0);
-
- for (p = RARRAY_PTR(ary), pend = p + RARRAY_LEN(ary); p < pend; p++) {
- if (RTEST(rb_yield(*p))) n++;
+ if (rb_block_given_p()) {
+ for (p = RARRAY_PTR(ary), pend = p+RARRAY_LEN(ary); p<pend; p++) {
+ if (RTEST(rb_yield(*p))) n++;
+ }
}
+ else {
+ for (p = RARRAY_PTR(ary), pend = p+RARRAY_LEN(ary); p<pend; p++) {
+ if (!NIL_P(*p)) n++;
+ }
+ }
}
else {
VALUE obj, *p, *pend;
Index: enum.c
===================================================================
--- enum.c (revision 16676)
+++ enum.c (working copy)
@@ -98,6 +98,19 @@
}
static VALUE
+count_nonnil_i(VALUE i, VALUE memop, int argc, VALUE *argv)
+{
+ VALUE *memo = (VALUE*)memop;
+
+ ENUM_WANT_SVALUE();
+
+ if (!NIL_P(i)) {
+ memo[0]++;
+ }
+ return Qnil;
+}
+
+static VALUE
count_iter_i(VALUE i, VALUE memop, int argc, VALUE *argv)
{
VALUE *memo = (VALUE*)memop;
@@ -112,9 +125,12 @@
* call-seq:
* enum.count(item) => int
* enum.count {| obj | block } => int
+ * enum.count => int
*
* Returns the number of items in <i>enum</i> for which equals to <i>item</i>.
* If a block is given, counts the number of elements yielding a true value.
+ * If no argument or block is given, returns the number of non-nil items.
+ * (False is considered non-nil.)
*
* ary = [1, 2, 4, 2]
* ary.count(2) # => 2
@@ -129,8 +145,12 @@
rb_block_call_func *func;
if (argc == 0) {
- RETURN_ENUMERATOR(obj, 0, 0);
- func = count_iter_i;
+ if (rb_block_given_p()) {
+ func = count_iter_i;
+ }
+ else {
+ func = count_nonnil_i;
+ }
}
else {
rb_scan_args(argc, argv, "1", &memo[1]);