ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#16611] lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

This is one of those e-mails that I know from the start to be futile, =20=

148 messages 2008/05/01
[#16613] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2008/05/01

T24gV2VkLCBBcHIgMzAsIDIwMDggYXQgMTE6MjYgUE0sIERhdmUgVGhvbWFzIDxkYXZlQHByYWdw
[#16620] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/01

Hi --
[#16622] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2008/05/01

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 11:06 AM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#16631] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/05/02

David A. Black wrote:
[#16632] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/05/02

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#16633] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/05/02

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
[#16635] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/05/02

Joel VanderWerf wrote:
[#16678] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Jakub Hegenbart" <jakub.hegenbart@...> 2008/05/06

T24gRnJpLCBNYXkgMiwgMjAwOCBhdCA0OjUyIEFNLCBNLiBFZHdhcmQgKEVkKSBCb3Jhc2t5Cjx6
[#16634] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/02

Hi --
[#16638] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2008/05/02

Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> writes:
[#16649] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...> 2008/05/04

wouldn't
[#16651] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2008/05/04

On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16612] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/05/01

I agree, I prefer this syntax. Although I'd prefer being consistent with
[#16615] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2008/05/01

Dave Thomas schrieb:
[#16618] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn@...> 2008/05/01

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#16625] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2008/05/01

Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner wrote:
[#16616] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/05/01

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
[#16661] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/05

On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 12:26:47PM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16662] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/05

Hi --
[#16663] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/05

David A. Black wrote:
[#16664] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/05

Hi --
[#16665] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/05

David A. Black wrote:
[#16669] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/05

On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:07:26AM +0900, ts wrote:
[#16671] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/05

Hi --
[#16673] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2008/05/05

On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 1:21 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#16674] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/05

On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:21:58AM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
[#16667] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/05

Hi --
[#16666] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/05

On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:02:34AM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
[#16668] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/05

Hi --
[#16670] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2008/05/05

On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 1:16 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#16676] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/05

Hi --
[#16672] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/05

On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:16:20AM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
[#16677] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/05

Hi --
[#16675] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...> 2008/05/05

Doing something completely foreign and, dare I say, Perl-esque seems
[#16711] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Artem Voroztsov" <artem.voroztsov@...> 2008/05/11

2008/5/5 Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com>:
[#16682] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — ara howard <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/08

[#16683] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/08

Hi --
[#16686] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/08

[#16689] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/08

Hi --
[#16894] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Curt Sampson <cjs@...> 2008/05/25

As background: I've been doing Ruby full-time for about four years,
[#16684] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2008/05/08

ara howard wrote:
[#16685] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/08

[#16687] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/08

Hi --
[#16688] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...> 2008/05/08

Not only that but don't you think that it's going to cause conflicts
[#16691] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/08

[#16692] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/08

Hi --
[#16695] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/08

[#16696] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/08

Hi --
[#16697] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "E S" <ruby-ml@...> 2008/05/09

How about we just move to UTF-8 source files and
[#16698] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...> 2008/05/09

"E S" <ruby-ml@kittensoft.org> writes:
[#16699] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/05/09

T24gRnJpLCBNYXkgOSwgMjAwOCBhdCA2OjM0IFBNLCBQaGlsIEhhZ2VsYmVyZyA8cGhpbEBoYWdl
[#16701] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2008/05/09

Phil Hagelberg wrote:
[#16700] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/05/09

On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:09 PM, E S <ruby-ml@kittensoft.org> wrote:
[#16705] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/05/11

Not to throw the whole thread into a tizzy again, but why again is:
[#16706] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Dirk Traulsen" <dirk.traulsen@...> 2008/05/11

Am 11 May 2008 um 15:14 hat Evan Phoenix geschrieben:
[#16707] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2008/05/11

Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#16742] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/12

On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 07:24:07PM +0900, Michael Neumann wrote:
[#16743] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/12

Paul Brannan wrote:
[#16744] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/12

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> wrote:
[#16748] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — apeiros <apeiros@...> 2008/05/12

Am 12.05.2008 um 16:40 schrieb Eric Mahurin:
[#16708] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/11

Hi,
[#16709] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/11

Hi --
[#16714] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/05/11

[#16716] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2008/05/11

Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#16717] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/05/11

[#16725] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/05/12

On May 11, 2008, at 3:40 PM, Jim Weirich wrote:
[#16718] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/05/11

On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16751] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/13

[#16710] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/11

On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
[#16712] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/05/11

On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Eric Mahurin <eric.mahurin@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16713] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/11

On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com>
[#16715] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/05/11

On May 11, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#16720] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/11

Hi,
[#16721] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/12

Hi --
[#16722] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/12

Hi,
[#16723] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/05/12

[#16724] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/12

Hi,
[#16726] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/05/12

What about "fn" or "fun", for "function"?
[#16728] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/12

Hi,
[#16731] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/05/12

[#16732] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/12

Hi,
[#16733] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/05/12

[#16734] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/12

Hi,
[#16771] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Joseph A Holsten <joseph@...> 2008/05/14

[#16740] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/12

On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>
[#16735] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...> 2008/05/12

I like the idea of fun or fn simply because it doesn't lock a language
[#16741] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/12

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:39:27AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#16759] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/13

Hi --
[#16766] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/14

Hi,
[#16768] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/05/14

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#16785] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/18

Hi --
[#16784] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/18

Hi --
[#16795] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Nate_Wiger@... 2008/05/19

On Wed, 14 May 2008, David A. Black wrote:
[#16797] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/19

Hi,
[#16798] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Christopher Gill" <gilltots@...> 2008/05/19

how about an uppercase lambda (instead of the usual lowercase one)
[#16802] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/20

Christopher Gill wrote:
[#16843] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/22

Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
[#16844] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/22

Hi,
[#16859] Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity (Was: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on) — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/23

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#16862] Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity (Was: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/23

Hi,
[#16867] Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity (Was: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/23

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
[#16868] Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity (Was: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on) — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/23

Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#16869] Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity (Was: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on) — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/23

Hi,
[#16846] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2008/05/22

=20
[#16847] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/22

[#16852] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/05/22

On May 22, 2008, at 8:37 AM, Berger, Daniel wrote:
[#16854] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/05/22

T24gVGh1LCBNYXkgMjIsIDIwMDggYXQgNTozNyBQTSwgQmVyZ2VyLCBEYW5pZWwgPERhbmllbC5C
[#16857] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...> 2008/05/23

RXZlbiB0aG91Z2ggSSBzZWUgdGhlIHVzZWZ1bG5lc3MsIHRoYXQncyBqdXN0IHVnbHkuCgotLUpl
[#16874] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Nate_Wiger@... 2008/05/23

"Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@gmail.com> wrote on 05/22/2008 05:35:01=20
[#16875] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2008/05/23

2008/5/23 <Nate_Wiger@playstation.sony.com>:
[#16879] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Tammo Tjarks <tammo@...> 2008/05/24

I am not sure if that fits to the thread. I have not used yet the more
[#16881] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/05/24

Tammo Tjarks wrote:
[#16883] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/24

Hi --
[#16885] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/05/25

> assert_yin_yang -> { q += 0 }, 'it broke!', -> { q == 42 }
[#16887] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/25

Hi --
[#16888] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/05/25

>> assert_yin_yang proc{ q += 0 }, 'it broke!',
[#16889] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/25

Hi --
[#16890] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/05/25

> My view is that it isn't excess, any more than in this case:
[#16893] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/25

Hi --
[#16899] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/05/26

> It's really just -> that I (and others, if I'm
[#16891] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/25

On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 6:46 AM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#16892] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/25

Hi --
[#16801] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...> 2008/05/19

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 02:37:49AM +0900, Christopher Gill wrote:
[#16804] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/20

[#16850] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — _why <why@...> 2008/05/22

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 01:54:17PM +0900, ara.t.howard wrote:
[#16813] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/05/20

> So, you prefer lambda(x) {...} or x => {...} over ->(x){...}, right?
[#16815] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2008/05/20

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Phlip <phlip2005@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16814] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/05/20

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Phlip <phlip2005@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16831] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Nate_Wiger@... 2008/05/21

Hi-
[#16835] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Yemi I. D. Bedu" <yemi@...> 2008/05/21

Hello,
[#16838] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/22

Hi --
[#16840] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/22

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 02:23:29AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#16841] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2008/05/22

On 19/05/2008, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#16752] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/13

[#16756] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/13

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:25:10PM +0900, ara.t.howard wrote:
[#16757] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/13

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> wrote:
[#16758] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/13

[#16761] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/05/13

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> wrote:
[#16745] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...> 2008/05/12

Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@gmail.com> writes:
[#16727] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2008/05/12

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#16729] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/12

Hi,
[#16730] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/05/12

[#16737] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...> 2008/05/12

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:37:52AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#16736] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/12

[#16753] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/13

[#16693] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2008/05/08

David A. Black wrote:
[#16694] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/08

Hi --

[#16614] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

> Is it too late for Ruby 1.9 to support lambdas that look like

3 messages 2008/05/01
[#16617] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/05/01

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> wrote:
[#16619] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/01

Hi --

[#16623] expect.rb Maintainer? — James Gray <james@...>

Does anyone here know who the expect.rb maintainer is? Brian Candler

2 messages 2008/05/01
[#16624] Re: expect.rb Maintainer? — James Gray <james@...> 2008/05/01

On May 1, 2008, at 10:24 AM, James Gray wrote:

[#16626] Documentation Patch: Preventing XPath Injection attacks — Ken Bloom <kbloom@...>

Here's a patch to rexml/xpath.rb which documents the variables parameter

1 message 2008/05/01

[#16627] Monotonic timeofday() — zimbatm <zimbatm@...>

Hi ruby-core.

4 messages 2008/05/01
[#16628] Re: [PATCH] Monotonic timeofday() — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/05/01

On Fri, 2 May 2008 02:45:55 +0900, zimbatm <zimbatm@oree.ch> wrote:
[#16629] Re: [PATCH] Monotonic timeofday() — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/05/01

On Fri, 2 May 2008 03:26:53 +0900, MenTaLguY <mental@rydia.net> wrote:
[#16630] Re: [PATCH] Monotonic timeofday() — zimbatm <zimbatm@...> 2008/05/01

2008/5/1 MenTaLguY <mental@rydia.net>:

[#16636] ruby-mode.el patch — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...>

2 messages 2008/05/02
[#16637] Re: ruby-mode.el patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/02

Hi,

[#16639] Problem with YAML and Exception — Bill Lear <rael@...>

Very sorry if this is the wrong forum, but using ruby 1.8.6

1 message 2008/05/02

[#16640] TCPSocket with multiple sub-domains - always a 60 second timeout — "Luke Bayes" <lbayes@...>

Hey Folks,

3 messages 2008/05/02
[#16641] Re: TCPSocket with multiple sub-domains - always a 60 second timeout — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2008/05/02

[#16644] Re: TCPSocket with multiple sub-domains - always a 60 second timeout — "Luke Bayes" <lbayes@...> 2008/05/02

Thanks to your response, I found this thread:

[#16642] ruby/trunk rev 16276 broken? ib/erb.rb:429:in `initialize': wrong argument type StringScanner (expected true) (TypeError) — Kurt Stephens <ks@...>

Build crashes shortly after miniruby linkage

4 messages 2008/05/02
[#16643] Re: ruby/trunk rev 16276 broken? ib/erb.rb:429:in `initialize': wrong argument type StringScanner (expected true) (TypeError) — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/05/02

Same here.
[#16645] Re: ruby/trunk rev 16276 broken? ib/erb.rb:429:in `initialize': wrong argument type StringScanner (expected true) (TypeError) — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/03

Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
[#16646] Re: ruby/trunk rev 16276 broken? ib/erb.rb:429:in `initialize': wrong argument type StringScanner (expected true) (TypeError) — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2008/05/03

make MINIRUBY=ruby

[#16647] Struct::new — ts <decoux@...>

1 message 2008/05/03

[#16648] Uniform RDoc markup — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...>

Would there be any resistance to making the markup of the RDoc

9 messages 2008/05/04
[#16650] Re: Uniform RDoc markup — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/05/04

Jeremy McAnally wrote:
[#16652] Re: Uniform RDoc markup — Eleanor McHugh <eleanor@...> 2008/05/04

On 4 May 2008, at 19:05, Phlip wrote:
[#16653] Re: Uniform RDoc markup — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...> 2008/05/04

"Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@gmail.com> writes:
[#16654] Re: Uniform RDoc markup — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/05/05

[#16660] Re: Uniform RDoc markup — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...> 2008/05/05

Of course. I just tossed that out there because it makes sense to me,
[#16680] Re: Uniform RDoc markup — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/05/07

On May 4, 2008, at 09:13 AM, Jeremy McAnally wrote:
[#16681] Re: Uniform RDoc markup — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...> 2008/05/08

Right. The chrome would disappear if it's not necessary. Only 3
[#16690] Re: Uniform RDoc markup - automatic require() section — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/08

Jeremy McAnally wrote:

[#16655] load(true) — ts <decoux@...>

1 message 2008/05/05

[#16656] VM::InstructionSequence#disasm — ts <decoux@...>

1 message 2008/05/05

[#16657] docstrings (Was Re: Uniform RDoc markup) — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>

Speaking of Ruby and documentation, I'd like to put in a suggestion for

1 message 2008/05/05

[#16658] docstrings (Was Re: Uniform RDoc markup) — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>

Speaking of Ruby and documentation, I'd like to put in a suggestion for

2 messages 2008/05/05
[#16659] Re: docstrings (Was Re: Uniform RDoc markup) — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...> 2008/05/05

Message got truncated...

[#16679] Continuation && Array#sort! — ts <decoux@...>

1 message 2008/05/07

[#16702] — Xarc <shark234@...>

unsubscribe

2 messages 2008/05/10
[#16703] Re: — "Jet Ju" <jetbillwin@...> 2008/05/10

>

[#16704] — paqualou 1380 <paqualou1380@...>

unsuscribe=0A=0A__________________________________________________=0ADo You=

1 message 2008/05/10

[#16719] IRHG -- NEW RELEASE -- Chapter 05 Complete and Moving On — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Core,

2 messages 2008/05/11
[#16747] Re: IRHG -- NEW RELEASE -- Chapter 05 Complete and Moving On — "Pit Capitain" <pit.capitain@...> 2008/05/12

Hi Chuck,

[#16738] defined?(C &&= 0) — ts <decoux@...>

2 messages 2008/05/12
[#16750] Re: defined?(C &&= 0) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/13

Hi,

[#16739] IRHG -- Small Problem with Multi Character Translation — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Core,

1 message 2008/05/12

[#16746] Buffer overflow in Ruby 1.8.6? — Christopher Thompson <cthompson@...>

I think I have found a minor buffer overflow in string.c in Ruby 1.8.6.

2 messages 2008/05/12
[#16749] Re: Buffer overflow in Ruby 1.8.6? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/13

Hi,

[#16754] problems compiling 1.9 on MacOS 10.5.2 — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...>

2 messages 2008/05/13
[#16755] Re: problems compiling 1.9 on MacOS 10.5.2 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/13

Hi,

[#16760] errors running make test — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...>

I updated to revision 16403 and now compiling and running ruby1.9

4 messages 2008/05/13
[#16767] Re: errors running make test — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/14

Stephen Bannasch wrote:
[#16769] Re: errors running make test — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...> 2008/05/14

At 6:01 PM +0900 5/14/08, ts wrote:
[#16770] Re: errors running make test — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/14

Stephen Bannasch wrote:

[#16762] Minor memory leak in 1.8.6? — Christopher Thompson <cthompson@...>

Is it not the case that rb_Str_to_inum(str, base, badcheck) in bignum.c

1 message 2008/05/13

[#16763] Minor memory leak in 1.8.6? — Christopher Thompson <cthompson@...>

Is it not the case that rb_Str_to_inum(str, base, badcheck) in bignum.c

3 messages 2008/05/13
[#16764] Re: Minor memory leak in 1.8.6? — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/05/13

I think the point of ALLOCA_N is that the memory is allocated from the
[#16765] Re: Minor memory leak in 1.8.6? — <cthompson@...> 2008/05/14

Ah, of course. Yes. I hadn't run in to alloca before. Strange.

[#16772] The RubySpec project at rubyspec.org — Brian Ford <brixen@...>

Hi all,

1 message 2008/05/14

[#16773] Singleton methods on Float and Bignum — Evan Phoenix <evan@...>

In 1.8 (and 1.9 likely), trying to add a singleton method to a Float

8 messages 2008/05/15
[#16774] Re: Singleton methods on Float and Bignum — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/15

[#16775] Re: Singleton methods on Float and Bignum — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/05/15

Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#16776] Re: Singleton methods on Float and Bignum — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/05/15

[#16779] Re: Singleton methods on Float and Bignum — Matthias W臘hter <matthias@...> 2008/05/15

On 5/15/2008 5:33 AM, Joel VanderWerf wrote:
[#16780] Re: Singleton methods on Float and Bignum — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/05/15

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:24 AM, Matthias W=E4chter
[#16781] Re: Singleton methods on Float and Bignum — Matthias W臘hter <matthias@...> 2008/05/15

On 5/15/2008 1:39 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
[#16782] Re: Singleton methods on Float and Bignum — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/05/16

[#16777] Strange bug with common.mk, File, Test::Unit — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi all,

2 messages 2008/05/15
[#16778] Re: Strange bug with common.mk, File, Test::Unit — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/15

Hi,

[#16786] Kernel#system() do not last_status_set properly on Windows — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>

Hello Ruby hackers,

2 messages 2008/05/18
[#16787] Re: [PATCH] Kernel#system() do not last_status_set properly on Windows — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/05/18

It seems that previous message lost the patch:

[#16788] Ruby 1.8.7-preview3 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Folks,

3 messages 2008/05/18
[#16793] Re: Ruby 1.8.7-preview3 has been released — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/05/19

SSd2ZSB0cmllZCBsYXRlc3QgdmVyc2lvbiBmcm9tIDEuOCBicmFuY2ggKHJldmlzaW9uIHIxNjQ3
[#16848] Re: Ruby 1.8.7-preview3 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/05/22

At Mon, 19 May 2008 20:18:28 +0900,

[#16789] IRHG - Some parenthesis warnings in 1.8.6 - Missing 1.90??? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Core.

2 messages 2008/05/19
[#16790] Re: IRHG - Some parenthesis warnings in 1.8.6 - Missing 1.90??? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/19

Hi,

[#16791] GC heap allocation in 1.9 — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>

While getting the latest of trunk, I stumbled on r16194.

5 messages 2008/05/19
[#16792] Re: GC heap allocation in 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/19

Hi,
[#16975] Re: GC heap allocation in 1.9 — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2008/05/28

> I am very interested in any improvement on Ruby's GC. I'd happy to
[#16977] Re: GC heap allocation in 1.9 — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2008/05/28

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:33:28PM +0900, Roger Pack wrote:
[#17002] Re: GC heap allocation in 1.9 — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2008/05/29

---------- Forwarded message ----------

[#16794] instance_eval / instance_exec — ts <decoux@...>

1 message 2008/05/19

[#16796] instance_eval / instance_exec — ts <decoux@...>

1 message 2008/05/19

[#16799] Ruby 1.9 Pathname.new('/usr/bin') equivalent? — Nate_Wiger@...

Hi again, please let me know if this should go to Ruby Talk instead. I

2 messages 2008/05/19
[#16800] Nevermind (Re: Ruby 1.9 Pathname.new('/usr/bin') equivalent?) — Nate_Wiger@... 2008/05/19

Nevermind, this question is invalid. I had RUBYLIB set which was causing

[#16806] nil.instance_eval — ts <decoux@...>

4 messages 2008/05/20
[#16808] Re: [ruby-core:16806] [1.9] nil.instance_eval — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/05/20

Hi,
[#16810] Re: [ruby-core:16806] [1.9] nil.instance_eval — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/20

SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#16811] Re: [ruby-core:16810] Re: [ruby-core:16806] [1.9] nil.instance_eval — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/05/20

ts wrote:

[#16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — Masoom <masoom.shaikh@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2008/05/20
[#16809] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/05/20

Hi,
[#16816] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — Masoom <masoom.shaikh@...> 2008/05/20

that means current vm is not embeddable ? by min. src I guess you mean the
[#16817] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/20

Masoom wrote:
[#16819] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — Masoom <masoom.shaikh@...> 2008/05/20

yeah, thanks, but main.c was my reference for writing my own version :)
[#16821] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/20

Masoom wrote:
[#16828] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — Masoom <masoom.shaikh@...> 2008/05/21

Hello Guy,
[#16830] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/21

Masoom wrote:
[#16824] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/21

Hi,
[#16827] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — Masoom <masoom.shaikh@...> 2008/05/21

oh, I didn't notice, this example I just typed right here in mail client, my

[#16812] Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2008/05/20
[#16820] Re: Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/05/20

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:20 AM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#16822] Re: Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/05/20

Luis Lavena wrote:
[#16871] Re: Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/05/23

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Joel VanderWerf
[#16873] Re: Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/05/23

Robert Dober wrote:
[#16823] Re: Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number — "Jano Svitok" <jan.svitok@...> 2008/05/20

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16818] Re: Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number — "Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)" <shot@...> 2008/05/20

SASADA Koichi:
[#16829] Re: Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/05/21

Hello Koichi,

[#16825] Hash#delete wrong documentation — Gaston Ramos <ramos.gaston@...>

2 messages 2008/05/21
[#16826] Re: [PATCH] Hash#delete wrong documentation — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/21

Hi,

[#16832] Who is responsible for Ruby license? — "Han, Kimyung" <Kimyung.Han@...>

I am trying to discuss the ruby license with anyone who is responsible

6 messages 2008/05/21
[#16833] Re: [URGENT] Who is responsible for Ruby license? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/21

Hi,
[#16855] Re: [URGENT] Who is responsible for Ruby license? — "Han, Kimyung" <Kimyung.Han@...> 2008/05/22

[#16856] Re: [URGENT] Who is responsible for Ruby license? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/22

Hi,
[#16858] Re: [URGENT] Who is responsible for Ruby license? — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/05/23

Han, Kimyung wrote:
[#16866] Re: [URGENT] Who is responsible for Ruby license? — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/05/23

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Phlip <phlip2005@gmail.com> wrote:

[#16834] Returning duplicate values from Dir.glob — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>

Hi,

7 messages 2008/05/21
[#16836] Re: Returning duplicate values from Dir.glob — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/05/21

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Vladimir Sizikov <vsizikov@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16842] Re: Returning duplicate values from Dir.glob — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2008/05/22

> -----Original Message-----
[#16849] Re: Returning duplicate values from Dir.glob — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/05/22

Hi Luis, Dan,
[#16853] Re: Returning duplicate values from Dir.glob — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/22

Hi,
[#16865] Re: Returning duplicate values from Dir.glob — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/05/23

Hi guys,
[#16851] Re: Returning duplicate values from Dir.glob — "Johan Holmberg" <johan556@...> 2008/05/22

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Vladimir Sizikov <vsizikov@gmail.com> wrote:

[#16837] Server maintenance — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2008/05/22
[#16861] Re: Server maintenance — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...> 2008/05/23

Hello,

[#16839] ruby autoconf problems — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...>

Hello

6 messages 2008/05/22
[#16845] Re: ruby autoconf problems — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/22

Hi,
[#16860] Re: ruby autoconf problems — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2008/05/23

On 22/05/2008, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#16863] Re: ruby autoconf problems — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/23

Hi,
[#16872] Re: ruby autoconf problems — "Joseph Holsten" <joseph@...> 2008/05/23

Michal Suchanek wrote:
[#16882] Re: ruby autoconf problems — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2008/05/24

On 23/05/2008, Joseph Holsten <joseph@josephholsten.com> wrote:

[#16864] removal of magical definition of name for some class definition idioms — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>

Dear list

5 messages 2008/05/23
[#16870] Re: [RCR] removal of magical definition of name for some class definition idioms — "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...> 2008/05/23

On 5/23/08, Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16876] Re: [RCR] removal of magical definition of name for some class definition idioms — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/05/24

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Wilson Bilkovich <wilsonb@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16877] Re: [RCR] removal of magical definition of name for some class definition idioms — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/24

Hi --
[#16878] Re: [RCR] removal of magical definition of name for some class definition idioms — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/05/24

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 8:44 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:

[#16880] patch for block args w/ defaults (was Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:18 AM, ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote:

1 message 2008/05/24

[#16884] block args w/ defaults (was Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Eric Mahurin <eric.mahurin@gmail.com>

4 messages 2008/05/24
[#16925] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (was Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity) — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/05/26

SGV5IQoKSSd2ZSB0cmllZCB5b3VyIHBhdGNoIGFuZCBoYXZlIHNvbWUgdHJvdWJsZXMuCkkgZXhw
[#16932] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (was Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/27

MjAwOC81LzI2IFJhZG9zs2F3IEJ1s2F0IDxyYWRlay5idWxhdEBnbWFpbC5jb20+OgoKPiBIZXkh
[#16939] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (was Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity) — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/05/27

MjAwOC81LzI3IEVyaWMgTWFodXJpbiA8ZXJpYy5tYWh1cmluQGdtYWlsLmNvbT46Cj4gMjAwOC81

[#16886] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>

This patch is an independent but related one to my previous one. It can be

64 messages 2008/05/25
[#16895] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16900] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/26

On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
[#16901] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16902] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16903] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16904] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/26

[#16905] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16906] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/26

Hi --
[#16907] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/26

[#16908] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/05/26

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
[#16909] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/05/26

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Meinrad Recheis <meinrad.recheis@gmail.com>
[#16910] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16911] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/05/26

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>
[#16914] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16915] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/26

[#16916] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16917] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/26

[#16918] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16919] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...> 2008/05/26

Hello.
[#17021] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Yemi I. D. Bedu" <yemi@...> 2008/05/30

Hello,
[#17020] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Yemi I. D. Bedu" <yemi@...> 2008/05/30

Hello,
[#16912] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16920] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/26

If I may, here are two entries from the ChangeLog file:
[#16922] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/26

[#16926] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...> 2008/05/26

+1 to that. I've only now started trying to write a lot of my
[#16927] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/26

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16928] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/26

[#16929] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/26

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16931] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/27

[#16946] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/27

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16947] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — James Gray <james@...> 2008/05/27

On May 27, 2008, at 12:33 PM, David Flanagan wrote:
[#16949] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/27

James Gray wrote:
[#16950] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — James Gray <james@...> 2008/05/27

On May 27, 2008, at 1:32 PM, David Flanagan wrote:
[#16954] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/27

[#16956] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/27

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16961] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/28

David Flanagan wrote:
[#16964] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/28

Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
[#17113] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Yemi I. D. Bedu" <yemi@...> 2008/06/04

Hello,
[#16991] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/29

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:24:49PM +0900, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
[#17008] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/30

Hi,
[#17009] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/30

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:19 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#17013] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/30

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 11:19:34AM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#16957] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Nate_Wiger@... 2008/05/28

Hi-
[#16967] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/28

Hi,
[#16971] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/28

On 5/28/08, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#16990] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/29

Hi,
[#16992] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/29

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#16998] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/29

Hi,
[#16999] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/05/29

R3V5cywgSSBkbyB1bmRlcnN0YW5kIHdoeSB5b3UgZG9uJ3QgbGlrZSAtPiBhbmQgbWF5YmUgaXQg
[#17000] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/29

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#16930] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...> 2008/05/26

Uh, I'd argue that his condition has been met, but, obviously, that is
[#16935] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/27

Hi --
[#16948] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/27

David A. Black wrote:
[#16933] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/05/27

At 04:59 08/05/27, David Flanagan wrote:
[#16923] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/26

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>
[#16934] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/05/27

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#16937] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/27

Hi --
[#16938] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/27

On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 4:49 AM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#16942] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/27

Hi --
[#16913] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/26

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
[#16960] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/28

On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Eric Mahurin <eric.mahurin@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16981] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/28

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:12:05AM +0900, Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#16987] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/05/29

T24gV2VkLCBNYXkgMjgsIDIwMDggYXQgMTA6NTQgUE0sIFBhdWwgQnJhbm5hbiA8cGJyYW5uYW5A

[#16896] IRHG — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Core,

2 messages 2008/05/26
[#16897] Re: IRHG — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...> 2008/05/26

Nothing. As far as I can remember that syntax has worked. It made me

[#16898] Ruby 1.8.7-preview4 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Folks,

3 messages 2008/05/26
[#16952] Re: Ruby 1.8.7-preview4 has been released — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/27

On May 25, 8:47=A0pm, "Akinori MUSHA" <k...@iDaemons.org> wrote:
[#16996] Re: Ruby 1.8.7-preview4 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/05/29

At Wed, 28 May 2008 06:04:56 +0900,

[#16921] Major performance degradation on trunk — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2008/05/26
[#16924] Re: Major performance degradation on trunk — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16936] Re: Major performance degradation on trunk — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/05/27

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#16940] Re: Major performance degradation on trunk — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/27

Hi,
[#16941] Re: Major performance degradation on trunk — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/05/27

Hi,

[#16943] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (updated) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>

MjAwOC81LzI2IFJhZG9zs2F3IEJ1s2F0IDxyYWRlay5idWxhdEBnbWFpbC5jb20+OgoKPiBIZXkh

5 messages 2008/05/27
[#16944] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (updated) — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/05/27

Q291bGQgeW91IHNlbmQgdGhpcyBwYXRjaCBhcyBhdHRhY2htZW50IHBsZWFzZT8gV2hlbiBJIGNv
[#16959] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (updated) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/28

2008/5/27 Radoslaw Bulat <radek.bulat@gmail.com>:
[#16958] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (updated) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/28

MjAwOC81LzI3IFJhZG9zs2F3IEJ1s2F0IDxyYWRlay5idWxhdEBnbWFpbC5jb20+OgoKPiBDb3Vs
[#16963] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (updated) — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/28

Eric Mahurin wrote:

[#16945] Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Looking at the source, I'd expect the following to work:

9 messages 2008/05/27
[#16965] Re: Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/28

Hi,
[#16966] Re: Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/05/28

This used to work, but the last time I checked
[#16968] Re: Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/28

Martin Duerst wrote:
[#16969] Re: Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/28

Hi,
[#16973] Re: Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/28

[#16974] Re: Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/28

Hi,
[#17025] Re: Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/05/31

[written before Matz's additional answer]
[#16978] Re: Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/28

ts wrote:

[#16951] Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered" — "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2008/05/27
[#17133] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered" — "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...> 2008/06/06

2008/5/27, Paul Boekholt <p.boekholt@gmail.com>:
[#17199] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered" — "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...> 2008/06/10

2008/6/6, Paul Boekholt <p.boekholt@gmail.com>:
[#17227] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered" — "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...> 2008/06/11

> 2008/6/6, Paul Boekholt <p.boekholt@gmail.com>:
[#17231] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered" — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/06/12

Hi,
[#17235] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered" — "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...> 2008/06/12

2008/6/12, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>:
[#17420] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered" — "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...> 2008/06/28

Hi,
[#17624] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered" — "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...> 2008/07/06

Hi,

[#16953] 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem — Christopher Thompson <cthompson@...>

Warning: This message is probably only peripherally related to Ruby!

8 messages 2008/05/27
[#16970] Re: 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2008/05/28

I used to catch Errno::EINVAL when using lots of open file descriptors
[#16982] Re: 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/05/29

On May 28, 2008, at 04:23 AM, Roger Pack wrote:
[#16985] Re: 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/05/29

On May 28, 2008, at 18:09 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#17005] Re: 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/05/29

Roger Pack wrote:
[#17053] Re: 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem — Christopher Thompson <cthompson@...> 2008/06/02

Hongli Lai wrote:
[#17054] Re: 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem — "Nick Sieger" <nicksieger@...> 2008/06/02

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Christopher Thompson
[#16962] Re: 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/05/28

On May 27, 2008, at 14:16 PM, Christopher Thompson wrote:

[#16955] ruby-mode.el copyright assignment — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...>

6 messages 2008/05/27
[#17022] Re: ruby-mode.el copyright assignment — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/31

Hi,
[#17023] Re: ruby-mode.el copyright assignment — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...> 2008/05/31

Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> writes:
[#17024] Re: ruby-mode.el copyright assignment — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/31

Hi,
[#17205] Re: ruby-mode.el copyright assignment — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...> 2008/06/11

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
[#17514] Re: ruby-mode.el copyright assignment — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...> 2008/07/02

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#16976] IRHG -- New Release - Chapter 08 Finished! — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Core,

1 message 2008/05/28

[#16979] Array.nitems replacement? — David Flanagan <david@...>

Array.nitems has just been removed from 1.9, and as near as I can make

8 messages 2008/05/28
[#16993] Re: Array.nitems replacement? — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/05/29

At Thu, 29 May 2008 03:03:01 +0900,
[#16994] Re: Array.nitems replacement? — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/05/29

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
[#16995] Re: Array.nitems replacement? — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2008/05/29

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
[#16997] Re: Array.nitems replacement? — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2008/05/29

On Thursday 29 May 2008, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17003] Re: Array.nitems replacement? — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/29

Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17004] Re: Array.nitems replacement? — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/05/29

At Fri, 30 May 2008 02:35:56 +0900,
[#17006] Re: Array.nitems replacement? — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/05/29

I just changed Enumerable#count() to return the number of all elements

[#16980] Re: Array.nitems replacement? — David Flanagan <david@...>

I've attached a patch to alter Enumerable#count and Array#count so that

1 message 2008/05/28

[#16983] Bug in Method#to_proc on method with block — Mikael Hlund <mikael@...>

I seem to have found a bug in Ruby 1.9. Method#to_proc doesn't seem to =20=

2 messages 2008/05/29
[#16988] Re: Bug in Method#to_proc on method with block — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/29

Mikael Hlund wrote:

[#16984] ZLIB for MSVC 8 - tar_input.rb — "Giancarlo F Bellido" <support@...>

I managed to install wxruby and compile zlib extension using this patch in

5 messages 2008/05/29
[#16986] Re: [PATCH] ZLIB for MSVC 8 - tar_input.rb — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/05/29

On May 28, 2008, at 19:48 PM, Giancarlo F Bellido wrote:
[#16989] Re: [PATCH] ZLIB for MSVC 8 - tar_input.rb — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/05/29

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#17001] Re: [PATCH] ZLIB for MSVC 8 - tar_input.rb — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/05/29

On May 29, 2008, at 05:39 AM, Luis Lavena wrote:
[#17007] Re: [PATCH] ZLIB for MSVC 8 - tar_input.rb — "Giancarlo F Bellido" <support@...> 2008/05/29

> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Eric Hodel

[#17010] unexpected return using define_method — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>

Is this a bug?

8 messages 2008/05/30
[#17012] Re: unexpected return using define_method — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/30

Paul Brannan wrote:
[#17014] Re: unexpected return using define_method — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/30

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 06:10:25PM +0900, ts wrote:
[#17015] Re: unexpected return using define_method — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/30

Paul Brannan wrote:
[#17016] Re: unexpected return using define_method — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/05/30

At Fri, 30 May 2008 21:38:10 +0900,
[#17017] Re: unexpected return using define_method — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/30

Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17018] Re: unexpected return using define_method — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/05/30

At Fri, 30 May 2008 22:49:31 +0900,
[#17019] Re: unexpected return using define_method — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/30

Akinori MUSHA wrote:

[#17011] nd_file no longer used? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>

In the ChangeLog, I see this comment:

1 message 2008/05/30

[#17026] error when building 1.8.7 from source with --enable-shared — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...>

V2hlbiBJIHRyeSB0byBidWlsZCBydWJ5IGZyb20gYnJhbmNoIHJ1YnlfMV84IHdpdGggLS1lbmFi

2 messages 2008/05/31
[#17027] Re: error when building 1.8.7 from source with --enable-shared — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/05/31

VGhlIHNhbWUgZm9yIHNvdXJjZSBmcm9tIHRydW5rLgoKL3Vzci9iaW4vbGQ6IHJlZ2NvbXAubzog

[#17028] Ruby 1.8.7 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Folks,

10 messages 2008/05/31
[#17038] Ruby 1.8.7 slower than 1.8.6? — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...> 2008/06/02

Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17033] Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...> 2008/06/01

On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 12:25:08AM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17042] Re: Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/06/02

At Mon, 2 Jun 2008 06:37:21 +0900,
[#17043] Re: Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/06/02

At Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:46:53 +0900,
[#17044] Re: Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...> 2008/06/02

On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 03:46:53PM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17046] Re: Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...> 2008/06/02

On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 04:07:21PM +0900, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
[#17396] Re: Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken — "Stephen Sykes" <sdsykes@...> 2008/06/24

I notice that ERB is still broken in Ruby 1.8.7.
[#17403] Re: Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/06/25

I was under the impression that comments were never allowed in ERB. For
[#17404] Re: Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken — "Stephen Sykes" <sdsykes@...> 2008/06/25

OK, fair enough, thanks.

[#17029] Re: [ruby-cvs:23967] Ruby:r16731: oops — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Please checkout the ruby_1_8_7 branch over again if you have one.

1 message 2008/05/31

[#17030] Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9 — Adam Strzelecki <ono@...>

Hello,

8 messages 2008/05/31
[#17119] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9 — Adam Strzelecki <ono@...> 2008/06/05

Hello again,
[#17120] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9 — ts <decoux@...> 2008/06/05

Adam Strzelecki wrote:
[#17121] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/06/05

Hi,
[#17122] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9 — Adam Strzelecki <ono@...> 2008/06/05

> to_ary() convert ISeq object to Array and well known objects such as
[#17123] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9 — Adam Strzelecki <ono@...> 2008/06/05

Just wanted to say thanks again, it works like a charm. I've reenabled
[#17124] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/06/05

Hi,
[#17125] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/06/05

Hi,

Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (updated)

From: "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
Date: 2008-05-27 13:07:44 UTC
List: ruby-core #16943 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In This Thread

Prev Next