ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#16611] lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

This is one of those e-mails that I know from the start to be futile, =20=

148 messages 2008/05/01
[#16613] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2008/05/01

T24gV2VkLCBBcHIgMzAsIDIwMDggYXQgMTE6MjYgUE0sIERhdmUgVGhvbWFzIDxkYXZlQHByYWdw
[#16620] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/01

Hi --
[#16622] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2008/05/01

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 11:06 AM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#16631] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...> 2008/05/02

David A. Black wrote:
[#16632] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/05/02

Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
[#16633] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/05/02

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
[#16635] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2008/05/02

Joel VanderWerf wrote:
[#16678] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Jakub Hegenbart" <jakub.hegenbart@...> 2008/05/06

T24gRnJpLCBNYXkgMiwgMjAwOCBhdCA0OjUyIEFNLCBNLiBFZHdhcmQgKEVkKSBCb3Jhc2t5Cjx6
[#16634] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/02

Hi --
[#16638] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2008/05/02

Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> writes:
[#16649] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...> 2008/05/04

wouldn't
[#16651] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2008/05/04

On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16612] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/05/01

I agree, I prefer this syntax. Although I'd prefer being consistent with
[#16615] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Wolfgang Nádasi-Donner <ed.odanow@...> 2008/05/01

Dave Thomas schrieb:
[#16618] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn@...> 2008/05/01

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#16625] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2008/05/01

Wolfgang N叩dasi-Donner wrote:
[#16616] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/05/01

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
[#16661] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/05

On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 12:26:47PM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16662] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/05

Hi --
[#16663] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/05

David A. Black wrote:
[#16664] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/05

Hi --
[#16665] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/05

David A. Black wrote:
[#16669] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/05

On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:07:26AM +0900, ts wrote:
[#16671] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/05

Hi --
[#16673] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2008/05/05

On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 1:21 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#16674] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/05

On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:21:58AM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
[#16667] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/05

Hi --
[#16666] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/05

On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:02:34AM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
[#16668] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/05

Hi --
[#16670] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2008/05/05

On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 1:16 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#16676] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/05

Hi --
[#16672] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/05

On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:16:20AM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
[#16677] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/05

Hi --
[#16675] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...> 2008/05/05

Doing something completely foreign and, dare I say, Perl-esque seems
[#16711] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Artem Voroztsov" <artem.voroztsov@...> 2008/05/11

2008/5/5 Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com>:
[#16682] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — ara howard <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/08

[#16683] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/08

Hi --
[#16686] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/08

[#16689] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/08

Hi --
[#16894] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Curt Sampson <cjs@...> 2008/05/25

As background: I've been doing Ruby full-time for about four years,
[#16684] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2008/05/08

ara howard wrote:
[#16685] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/08

[#16687] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/08

Hi --
[#16688] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...> 2008/05/08

Not only that but don't you think that it's going to cause conflicts
[#16691] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/08

[#16692] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/08

Hi --
[#16695] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/08

[#16696] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/08

Hi --
[#16697] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "E S" <ruby-ml@...> 2008/05/09

How about we just move to UTF-8 source files and
[#16698] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...> 2008/05/09

"E S" <ruby-ml@kittensoft.org> writes:
[#16699] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/05/09

T24gRnJpLCBNYXkgOSwgMjAwOCBhdCA2OjM0IFBNLCBQaGlsIEhhZ2VsYmVyZyA8cGhpbEBoYWdl
[#16701] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2008/05/09

Phil Hagelberg wrote:
[#16700] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/05/09

On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:09 PM, E S <ruby-ml@kittensoft.org> wrote:
[#16705] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/05/11

Not to throw the whole thread into a tizzy again, but why again is:
[#16706] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Dirk Traulsen" <dirk.traulsen@...> 2008/05/11

Am 11 May 2008 um 15:14 hat Evan Phoenix geschrieben:
[#16707] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2008/05/11

Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#16742] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/12

On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 07:24:07PM +0900, Michael Neumann wrote:
[#16743] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/12

Paul Brannan wrote:
[#16744] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/12

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> wrote:
[#16748] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — apeiros <apeiros@...> 2008/05/12

Am 12.05.2008 um 16:40 schrieb Eric Mahurin:
[#16708] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/11

Hi,
[#16709] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/11

Hi --
[#16714] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/05/11

[#16716] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2008/05/11

Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#16717] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/05/11

[#16725] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/05/12

On May 11, 2008, at 3:40 PM, Jim Weirich wrote:
[#16718] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/05/11

On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Daniel Berger <djberg96@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16751] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/13

[#16710] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/11

On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
[#16712] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/05/11

On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Eric Mahurin <eric.mahurin@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16713] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/11

On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com>
[#16715] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/05/11

On May 11, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#16720] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/11

Hi,
[#16721] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/12

Hi --
[#16722] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/12

Hi,
[#16723] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/05/12

[#16724] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/12

Hi,
[#16726] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/05/12

What about "fn" or "fun", for "function"?
[#16728] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/12

Hi,
[#16731] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/05/12

[#16732] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/12

Hi,
[#16733] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/05/12

[#16734] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/12

Hi,
[#16771] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Joseph A Holsten <joseph@...> 2008/05/14

[#16740] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/12

On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>
[#16735] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...> 2008/05/12

I like the idea of fun or fn simply because it doesn't lock a language
[#16741] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/12

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:39:27AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#16759] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/13

Hi --
[#16766] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/14

Hi,
[#16768] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/05/14

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#16785] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/18

Hi --
[#16784] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/18

Hi --
[#16795] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Nate_Wiger@... 2008/05/19

On Wed, 14 May 2008, David A. Black wrote:
[#16797] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/19

Hi,
[#16798] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Christopher Gill" <gilltots@...> 2008/05/19

how about an uppercase lambda (instead of the usual lowercase one)
[#16802] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/20

Christopher Gill wrote:
[#16843] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/22

Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
[#16844] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/22

Hi,
[#16859] Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity (Was: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on) — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/23

Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#16862] Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity (Was: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/23

Hi,
[#16867] Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity (Was: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/23

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
[#16868] Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity (Was: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on) — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/23

Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#16869] Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity (Was: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on) — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/23

Hi,
[#16846] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2008/05/22

=20
[#16847] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/22

[#16852] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2008/05/22

On May 22, 2008, at 8:37 AM, Berger, Daniel wrote:
[#16854] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/05/22

T24gVGh1LCBNYXkgMjIsIDIwMDggYXQgNTozNyBQTSwgQmVyZ2VyLCBEYW5pZWwgPERhbmllbC5C
[#16857] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...> 2008/05/23

RXZlbiB0aG91Z2ggSSBzZWUgdGhlIHVzZWZ1bG5lc3MsIHRoYXQncyBqdXN0IHVnbHkuCgotLUpl
[#16874] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Nate_Wiger@... 2008/05/23

"Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@gmail.com> wrote on 05/22/2008 05:35:01=20
[#16875] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2008/05/23

2008/5/23 <Nate_Wiger@playstation.sony.com>:
[#16879] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Tammo Tjarks <tammo@...> 2008/05/24

I am not sure if that fits to the thread. I have not used yet the more
[#16881] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/05/24

Tammo Tjarks wrote:
[#16883] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/24

Hi --
[#16885] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/05/25

> assert_yin_yang -> { q += 0 }, 'it broke!', -> { q == 42 }
[#16887] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/25

Hi --
[#16888] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/05/25

>> assert_yin_yang proc{ q += 0 }, 'it broke!',
[#16889] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/25

Hi --
[#16890] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/05/25

> My view is that it isn't excess, any more than in this case:
[#16893] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/25

Hi --
[#16899] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/05/26

> It's really just -> that I (and others, if I'm
[#16891] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/25

On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 6:46 AM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#16892] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/25

Hi --
[#16801] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...> 2008/05/19

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 02:37:49AM +0900, Christopher Gill wrote:
[#16804] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/20

[#16850] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — _why <why@...> 2008/05/22

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 01:54:17PM +0900, ara.t.howard wrote:
[#16813] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/05/20

> So, you prefer lambda(x) {...} or x => {...} over ->(x){...}, right?
[#16815] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2008/05/20

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Phlip <phlip2005@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16814] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/05/20

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Phlip <phlip2005@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16831] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Nate_Wiger@... 2008/05/21

Hi-
[#16835] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Yemi I. D. Bedu" <yemi@...> 2008/05/21

Hello,
[#16838] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/22

Hi --
[#16840] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/22

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 02:23:29AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#16841] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2008/05/22

On 19/05/2008, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#16752] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/13

[#16756] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/13

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:25:10PM +0900, ara.t.howard wrote:
[#16757] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/13

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> wrote:
[#16758] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/13

[#16761] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/05/13

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> wrote:
[#16745] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...> 2008/05/12

Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@gmail.com> writes:
[#16727] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2008/05/12

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#16729] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/12

Hi,
[#16730] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/05/12

[#16737] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...> 2008/05/12

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:37:52AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#16736] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/12

[#16753] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/13

[#16693] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2008/05/08

David A. Black wrote:
[#16694] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/08

Hi --

[#16614] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

> Is it too late for Ruby 1.9 to support lambdas that look like

3 messages 2008/05/01
[#16617] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/05/01

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> wrote:
[#16619] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/01

Hi --

[#16623] expect.rb Maintainer? — James Gray <james@...>

Does anyone here know who the expect.rb maintainer is? Brian Candler

2 messages 2008/05/01
[#16624] Re: expect.rb Maintainer? — James Gray <james@...> 2008/05/01

On May 1, 2008, at 10:24 AM, James Gray wrote:

[#16626] Documentation Patch: Preventing XPath Injection attacks — Ken Bloom <kbloom@...>

Here's a patch to rexml/xpath.rb which documents the variables parameter

1 message 2008/05/01

[#16627] Monotonic timeofday() — zimbatm <zimbatm@...>

Hi ruby-core.

4 messages 2008/05/01
[#16628] Re: [PATCH] Monotonic timeofday() — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/05/01

On Fri, 2 May 2008 02:45:55 +0900, zimbatm <zimbatm@oree.ch> wrote:
[#16629] Re: [PATCH] Monotonic timeofday() — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2008/05/01

On Fri, 2 May 2008 03:26:53 +0900, MenTaLguY <mental@rydia.net> wrote:
[#16630] Re: [PATCH] Monotonic timeofday() — zimbatm <zimbatm@...> 2008/05/01

2008/5/1 MenTaLguY <mental@rydia.net>:

[#16636] ruby-mode.el patch — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...>

2 messages 2008/05/02
[#16637] Re: ruby-mode.el patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/02

Hi,

[#16639] Problem with YAML and Exception — Bill Lear <rael@...>

Very sorry if this is the wrong forum, but using ruby 1.8.6

1 message 2008/05/02

[#16640] TCPSocket with multiple sub-domains - always a 60 second timeout — "Luke Bayes" <lbayes@...>

Hey Folks,

3 messages 2008/05/02
[#16641] Re: TCPSocket with multiple sub-domains - always a 60 second timeout — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2008/05/02

[#16644] Re: TCPSocket with multiple sub-domains - always a 60 second timeout — "Luke Bayes" <lbayes@...> 2008/05/02

Thanks to your response, I found this thread:

[#16642] ruby/trunk rev 16276 broken? ib/erb.rb:429:in `initialize': wrong argument type StringScanner (expected true) (TypeError) — Kurt Stephens <ks@...>

Build crashes shortly after miniruby linkage

4 messages 2008/05/02
[#16643] Re: ruby/trunk rev 16276 broken? ib/erb.rb:429:in `initialize': wrong argument type StringScanner (expected true) (TypeError) — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/05/02

Same here.
[#16645] Re: ruby/trunk rev 16276 broken? ib/erb.rb:429:in `initialize': wrong argument type StringScanner (expected true) (TypeError) — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/03

Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
[#16646] Re: ruby/trunk rev 16276 broken? ib/erb.rb:429:in `initialize': wrong argument type StringScanner (expected true) (TypeError) — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2008/05/03

make MINIRUBY=ruby

[#16647] Struct::new — ts <decoux@...>

1 message 2008/05/03

[#16648] Uniform RDoc markup — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...>

Would there be any resistance to making the markup of the RDoc

9 messages 2008/05/04
[#16650] Re: Uniform RDoc markup — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/05/04

Jeremy McAnally wrote:
[#16652] Re: Uniform RDoc markup — Eleanor McHugh <eleanor@...> 2008/05/04

On 4 May 2008, at 19:05, Phlip wrote:
[#16653] Re: Uniform RDoc markup — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...> 2008/05/04

"Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@gmail.com> writes:
[#16654] Re: Uniform RDoc markup — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2008/05/05

[#16660] Re: Uniform RDoc markup — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...> 2008/05/05

Of course. I just tossed that out there because it makes sense to me,
[#16680] Re: Uniform RDoc markup — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/05/07

On May 4, 2008, at 09:13 AM, Jeremy McAnally wrote:
[#16681] Re: Uniform RDoc markup — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...> 2008/05/08

Right. The chrome would disappear if it's not necessary. Only 3
[#16690] Re: Uniform RDoc markup - automatic require() section — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/08

Jeremy McAnally wrote:

[#16655] load(true) — ts <decoux@...>

1 message 2008/05/05

[#16656] VM::InstructionSequence#disasm — ts <decoux@...>

1 message 2008/05/05

[#16657] docstrings (Was Re: Uniform RDoc markup) — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>

Speaking of Ruby and documentation, I'd like to put in a suggestion for

1 message 2008/05/05

[#16658] docstrings (Was Re: Uniform RDoc markup) — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...>

Speaking of Ruby and documentation, I'd like to put in a suggestion for

2 messages 2008/05/05
[#16659] Re: docstrings (Was Re: Uniform RDoc markup) — "Rocky Bernstein" <rocky.bernstein@...> 2008/05/05

Message got truncated...

[#16679] Continuation && Array#sort! — ts <decoux@...>

1 message 2008/05/07

[#16702] — Xarc <shark234@...>

unsubscribe

2 messages 2008/05/10
[#16703] Re: — "Jet Ju" <jetbillwin@...> 2008/05/10

>

[#16704] — paqualou 1380 <paqualou1380@...>

unsuscribe=0A=0A__________________________________________________=0ADo You=

1 message 2008/05/10

[#16719] IRHG -- NEW RELEASE -- Chapter 05 Complete and Moving On — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Core,

2 messages 2008/05/11
[#16747] Re: IRHG -- NEW RELEASE -- Chapter 05 Complete and Moving On — "Pit Capitain" <pit.capitain@...> 2008/05/12

Hi Chuck,

[#16738] defined?(C &&= 0) — ts <decoux@...>

2 messages 2008/05/12
[#16750] Re: defined?(C &&= 0) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/13

Hi,

[#16739] IRHG -- Small Problem with Multi Character Translation — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Core,

1 message 2008/05/12

[#16746] Buffer overflow in Ruby 1.8.6? — Christopher Thompson <cthompson@...>

I think I have found a minor buffer overflow in string.c in Ruby 1.8.6.

2 messages 2008/05/12
[#16749] Re: Buffer overflow in Ruby 1.8.6? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/13

Hi,

[#16754] problems compiling 1.9 on MacOS 10.5.2 — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...>

2 messages 2008/05/13
[#16755] Re: problems compiling 1.9 on MacOS 10.5.2 — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/13

Hi,

[#16760] errors running make test — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...>

I updated to revision 16403 and now compiling and running ruby1.9

4 messages 2008/05/13
[#16767] Re: errors running make test — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/14

Stephen Bannasch wrote:
[#16769] Re: errors running make test — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...> 2008/05/14

At 6:01 PM +0900 5/14/08, ts wrote:
[#16770] Re: errors running make test — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/14

Stephen Bannasch wrote:

[#16762] Minor memory leak in 1.8.6? — Christopher Thompson <cthompson@...>

Is it not the case that rb_Str_to_inum(str, base, badcheck) in bignum.c

1 message 2008/05/13

[#16763] Minor memory leak in 1.8.6? — Christopher Thompson <cthompson@...>

Is it not the case that rb_Str_to_inum(str, base, badcheck) in bignum.c

3 messages 2008/05/13
[#16764] Re: Minor memory leak in 1.8.6? — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/05/13

I think the point of ALLOCA_N is that the memory is allocated from the
[#16765] Re: Minor memory leak in 1.8.6? — <cthompson@...> 2008/05/14

Ah, of course. Yes. I hadn't run in to alloca before. Strange.

[#16772] The RubySpec project at rubyspec.org — Brian Ford <brixen@...>

Hi all,

1 message 2008/05/14

[#16773] Singleton methods on Float and Bignum — Evan Phoenix <evan@...>

In 1.8 (and 1.9 likely), trying to add a singleton method to a Float

8 messages 2008/05/15
[#16774] Re: Singleton methods on Float and Bignum — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/15

[#16775] Re: Singleton methods on Float and Bignum — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/05/15

Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#16776] Re: Singleton methods on Float and Bignum — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/05/15

[#16779] Re: Singleton methods on Float and Bignum — Matthias W臘hter <matthias@...> 2008/05/15

On 5/15/2008 5:33 AM, Joel VanderWerf wrote:
[#16780] Re: Singleton methods on Float and Bignum — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2008/05/15

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:24 AM, Matthias W=E4chter
[#16781] Re: Singleton methods on Float and Bignum — Matthias W臘hter <matthias@...> 2008/05/15

On 5/15/2008 1:39 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
[#16782] Re: Singleton methods on Float and Bignum — Kurt Stephens <ks@...> 2008/05/16

[#16777] Strange bug with common.mk, File, Test::Unit — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi all,

2 messages 2008/05/15
[#16778] Re: Strange bug with common.mk, File, Test::Unit — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/15

Hi,

[#16786] Kernel#system() do not last_status_set properly on Windows — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>

Hello Ruby hackers,

2 messages 2008/05/18
[#16787] Re: [PATCH] Kernel#system() do not last_status_set properly on Windows — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/05/18

It seems that previous message lost the patch:

[#16788] Ruby 1.8.7-preview3 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Folks,

3 messages 2008/05/18
[#16793] Re: Ruby 1.8.7-preview3 has been released — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/05/19

SSd2ZSB0cmllZCBsYXRlc3QgdmVyc2lvbiBmcm9tIDEuOCBicmFuY2ggKHJldmlzaW9uIHIxNjQ3
[#16848] Re: Ruby 1.8.7-preview3 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/05/22

At Mon, 19 May 2008 20:18:28 +0900,

[#16789] IRHG - Some parenthesis warnings in 1.8.6 - Missing 1.90??? — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Core.

2 messages 2008/05/19
[#16790] Re: IRHG - Some parenthesis warnings in 1.8.6 - Missing 1.90??? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/19

Hi,

[#16791] GC heap allocation in 1.9 — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>

While getting the latest of trunk, I stumbled on r16194.

5 messages 2008/05/19
[#16792] Re: GC heap allocation in 1.9 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/19

Hi,
[#16975] Re: GC heap allocation in 1.9 — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2008/05/28

> I am very interested in any improvement on Ruby's GC. I'd happy to
[#16977] Re: GC heap allocation in 1.9 — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org> 2008/05/28

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:33:28PM +0900, Roger Pack wrote:
[#17002] Re: GC heap allocation in 1.9 — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2008/05/29

---------- Forwarded message ----------

[#16794] instance_eval / instance_exec — ts <decoux@...>

1 message 2008/05/19

[#16796] instance_eval / instance_exec — ts <decoux@...>

1 message 2008/05/19

[#16799] Ruby 1.9 Pathname.new('/usr/bin') equivalent? — Nate_Wiger@...

Hi again, please let me know if this should go to Ruby Talk instead. I

2 messages 2008/05/19
[#16800] Nevermind (Re: Ruby 1.9 Pathname.new('/usr/bin') equivalent?) — Nate_Wiger@... 2008/05/19

Nevermind, this question is invalid. I had RUBYLIB set which was causing

[#16806] nil.instance_eval — ts <decoux@...>

4 messages 2008/05/20
[#16808] Re: [ruby-core:16806] [1.9] nil.instance_eval — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/05/20

Hi,
[#16810] Re: [ruby-core:16806] [1.9] nil.instance_eval — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/20

SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#16811] Re: [ruby-core:16810] Re: [ruby-core:16806] [1.9] nil.instance_eval — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/05/20

ts wrote:

[#16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — Masoom <masoom.shaikh@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2008/05/20
[#16809] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/05/20

Hi,
[#16816] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — Masoom <masoom.shaikh@...> 2008/05/20

that means current vm is not embeddable ? by min. src I guess you mean the
[#16817] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/20

Masoom wrote:
[#16819] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — Masoom <masoom.shaikh@...> 2008/05/20

yeah, thanks, but main.c was my reference for writing my own version :)
[#16821] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/20

Masoom wrote:
[#16828] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — Masoom <masoom.shaikh@...> 2008/05/21

Hello Guy,
[#16830] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/21

Masoom wrote:
[#16824] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/21

Hi,
[#16827] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — Masoom <masoom.shaikh@...> 2008/05/21

oh, I didn't notice, this example I just typed right here in mail client, my

[#16812] Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2008/05/20
[#16820] Re: Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/05/20

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:20 AM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#16822] Re: Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/05/20

Luis Lavena wrote:
[#16871] Re: Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/05/23

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Joel VanderWerf
[#16873] Re: Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2008/05/23

Robert Dober wrote:
[#16823] Re: Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number — "Jano Svitok" <jan.svitok@...> 2008/05/20

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16818] Re: Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number — "Shot (Piotr Szotkowski)" <shot@...> 2008/05/20

SASADA Koichi:
[#16829] Re: Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/05/21

Hello Koichi,

[#16825] Hash#delete wrong documentation — Gaston Ramos <ramos.gaston@...>

2 messages 2008/05/21
[#16826] Re: [PATCH] Hash#delete wrong documentation — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/21

Hi,

[#16832] Who is responsible for Ruby license? — "Han, Kimyung" <Kimyung.Han@...>

I am trying to discuss the ruby license with anyone who is responsible

6 messages 2008/05/21
[#16833] Re: [URGENT] Who is responsible for Ruby license? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/21

Hi,
[#16855] Re: [URGENT] Who is responsible for Ruby license? — "Han, Kimyung" <Kimyung.Han@...> 2008/05/22

[#16856] Re: [URGENT] Who is responsible for Ruby license? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/22

Hi,
[#16858] Re: [URGENT] Who is responsible for Ruby license? — Phlip <phlip2005@...> 2008/05/23

Han, Kimyung wrote:
[#16866] Re: [URGENT] Who is responsible for Ruby license? — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/05/23

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Phlip <phlip2005@gmail.com> wrote:

[#16834] Returning duplicate values from Dir.glob — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>

Hi,

7 messages 2008/05/21
[#16836] Re: Returning duplicate values from Dir.glob — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/05/21

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Vladimir Sizikov <vsizikov@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16842] Re: Returning duplicate values from Dir.glob — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2008/05/22

> -----Original Message-----
[#16849] Re: Returning duplicate values from Dir.glob — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/05/22

Hi Luis, Dan,
[#16853] Re: Returning duplicate values from Dir.glob — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/22

Hi,
[#16865] Re: Returning duplicate values from Dir.glob — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/05/23

Hi guys,
[#16851] Re: Returning duplicate values from Dir.glob — "Johan Holmberg" <johan556@...> 2008/05/22

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Vladimir Sizikov <vsizikov@gmail.com> wrote:

[#16837] Server maintenance — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...>

Hello,

2 messages 2008/05/22
[#16861] Re: Server maintenance — "Shugo Maeda" <shugo@...> 2008/05/23

Hello,

[#16839] ruby autoconf problems — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...>

Hello

6 messages 2008/05/22
[#16845] Re: ruby autoconf problems — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/22

Hi,
[#16860] Re: ruby autoconf problems — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2008/05/23

On 22/05/2008, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#16863] Re: ruby autoconf problems — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/23

Hi,
[#16872] Re: ruby autoconf problems — "Joseph Holsten" <joseph@...> 2008/05/23

Michal Suchanek wrote:
[#16882] Re: ruby autoconf problems — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...> 2008/05/24

On 23/05/2008, Joseph Holsten <joseph@josephholsten.com> wrote:

[#16864] removal of magical definition of name for some class definition idioms — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>

Dear list

5 messages 2008/05/23
[#16870] Re: [RCR] removal of magical definition of name for some class definition idioms — "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...> 2008/05/23

On 5/23/08, Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16876] Re: [RCR] removal of magical definition of name for some class definition idioms — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/05/24

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Wilson Bilkovich <wilsonb@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16877] Re: [RCR] removal of magical definition of name for some class definition idioms — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/24

Hi --
[#16878] Re: [RCR] removal of magical definition of name for some class definition idioms — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/05/24

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 8:44 PM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:

[#16880] patch for block args w/ defaults (was Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:18 AM, ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote:

1 message 2008/05/24

[#16884] block args w/ defaults (was Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Eric Mahurin <eric.mahurin@gmail.com>

4 messages 2008/05/24
[#16925] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (was Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity) — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/05/26

SGV5IQoKSSd2ZSB0cmllZCB5b3VyIHBhdGNoIGFuZCBoYXZlIHNvbWUgdHJvdWJsZXMuCkkgZXhw
[#16932] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (was Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/27

MjAwOC81LzI2IFJhZG9zs2F3IEJ1s2F0IDxyYWRlay5idWxhdEBnbWFpbC5jb20+OgoKPiBIZXkh
[#16939] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (was Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity) — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/05/27

MjAwOC81LzI3IEVyaWMgTWFodXJpbiA8ZXJpYy5tYWh1cmluQGdtYWlsLmNvbT46Cj4gMjAwOC81

[#16886] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>

This patch is an independent but related one to my previous one. It can be

64 messages 2008/05/25
[#16895] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16900] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/26

On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
[#16901] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16902] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16903] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16904] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/26

[#16905] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16906] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/26

Hi --
[#16907] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/26

[#16908] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/05/26

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
[#16909] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/05/26

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Meinrad Recheis <meinrad.recheis@gmail.com>
[#16910] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16911] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/05/26

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>
[#16914] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16915] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/26

[#16916] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16917] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/26

[#16918] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16919] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...> 2008/05/26

Hello.
[#17021] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Yemi I. D. Bedu" <yemi@...> 2008/05/30

Hello,
[#17020] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Yemi I. D. Bedu" <yemi@...> 2008/05/30

Hello,
[#16912] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16920] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/26

If I may, here are two entries from the ChangeLog file:
[#16922] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/26

[#16926] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...> 2008/05/26

+1 to that. I've only now started trying to write a lot of my
[#16927] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/26

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16928] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/26

[#16929] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/26

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16931] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/27

[#16946] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/27

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16947] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — James Gray <james@...> 2008/05/27

On May 27, 2008, at 12:33 PM, David Flanagan wrote:
[#16949] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/27

James Gray wrote:
[#16950] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — James Gray <james@...> 2008/05/27

On May 27, 2008, at 1:32 PM, David Flanagan wrote:
[#16954] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/27

[#16956] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/27

Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16961] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/28

David Flanagan wrote:
[#16964] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/28

Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
[#17113] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Yemi I. D. Bedu" <yemi@...> 2008/06/04

Hello,
[#16991] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/29

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:24:49PM +0900, Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
[#17008] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/30

Hi,
[#17009] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/30

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:19 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#17013] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/30

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 11:19:34AM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#16957] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Nate_Wiger@... 2008/05/28

Hi-
[#16967] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/28

Hi,
[#16971] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/28

On 5/28/08, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#16990] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/29

Hi,
[#16992] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/29

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#16998] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/29

Hi,
[#16999] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/05/29

R3V5cywgSSBkbyB1bmRlcnN0YW5kIHdoeSB5b3UgZG9uJ3QgbGlrZSAtPiBhbmQgbWF5YmUgaXQg
[#17000] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/29

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#16930] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...> 2008/05/26

Uh, I'd argue that his condition has been met, but, obviously, that is
[#16935] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/27

Hi --
[#16948] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/27

David A. Black wrote:
[#16933] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/05/27

At 04:59 08/05/27, David Flanagan wrote:
[#16923] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/26

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>
[#16934] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/05/27

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#16937] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/27

Hi --
[#16938] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/27

On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 4:49 AM, David A. Black <dblack@rubypal.com> wrote:
[#16942] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/27

Hi --
[#16913] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/26

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
[#16960] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/28

On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Eric Mahurin <eric.mahurin@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16981] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/28

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:12:05AM +0900, Eric Mahurin wrote:
[#16987] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/05/29

T24gV2VkLCBNYXkgMjgsIDIwMDggYXQgMTA6NTQgUE0sIFBhdWwgQnJhbm5hbiA8cGJyYW5uYW5A

[#16896] IRHG — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Core,

2 messages 2008/05/26
[#16897] Re: IRHG — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...> 2008/05/26

Nothing. As far as I can remember that syntax has worked. It made me

[#16898] Ruby 1.8.7-preview4 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Folks,

3 messages 2008/05/26
[#16952] Re: Ruby 1.8.7-preview4 has been released — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/27

On May 25, 8:47=A0pm, "Akinori MUSHA" <k...@iDaemons.org> wrote:
[#16996] Re: Ruby 1.8.7-preview4 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/05/29

At Wed, 28 May 2008 06:04:56 +0900,

[#16921] Major performance degradation on trunk — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>

Hi,

5 messages 2008/05/26
[#16924] Re: Major performance degradation on trunk — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,
[#16936] Re: Major performance degradation on trunk — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2008/05/27

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 10:40 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#16940] Re: Major performance degradation on trunk — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/27

Hi,
[#16941] Re: Major performance degradation on trunk — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...> 2008/05/27

Hi,

[#16943] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (updated) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>

MjAwOC81LzI2IFJhZG9zs2F3IEJ1s2F0IDxyYWRlay5idWxhdEBnbWFpbC5jb20+OgoKPiBIZXkh

5 messages 2008/05/27
[#16944] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (updated) — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/05/27

Q291bGQgeW91IHNlbmQgdGhpcyBwYXRjaCBhcyBhdHRhY2htZW50IHBsZWFzZT8gV2hlbiBJIGNv
[#16959] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (updated) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/28

2008/5/27 Radoslaw Bulat <radek.bulat@gmail.com>:
[#16958] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (updated) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/28

MjAwOC81LzI3IFJhZG9zs2F3IEJ1s2F0IDxyYWRlay5idWxhdEBnbWFpbC5jb20+OgoKPiBDb3Vs
[#16963] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (updated) — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/28

Eric Mahurin wrote:

[#16945] Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Looking at the source, I'd expect the following to work:

9 messages 2008/05/27
[#16965] Re: Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/28

Hi,
[#16966] Re: Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/05/28

This used to work, but the last time I checked
[#16968] Re: Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/28

Martin Duerst wrote:
[#16969] Re: Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/28

Hi,
[#16973] Re: Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/28

[#16974] Re: Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/28

Hi,
[#17025] Re: Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2008/05/31

[written before Matz's additional answer]
[#16978] Re: Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/28

ts wrote:

[#16951] Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered" — "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2008/05/27
[#17133] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered" — "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...> 2008/06/06

2008/5/27, Paul Boekholt <p.boekholt@gmail.com>:
[#17199] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered" — "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...> 2008/06/10

2008/6/6, Paul Boekholt <p.boekholt@gmail.com>:
[#17227] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered" — "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...> 2008/06/11

> 2008/6/6, Paul Boekholt <p.boekholt@gmail.com>:
[#17231] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered" — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/06/12

Hi,
[#17235] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered" — "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...> 2008/06/12

2008/6/12, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>:
[#17420] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered" — "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...> 2008/06/28

Hi,
[#17624] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered" — "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...> 2008/07/06

Hi,

[#16953] 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem — Christopher Thompson <cthompson@...>

Warning: This message is probably only peripherally related to Ruby!

8 messages 2008/05/27
[#16970] Re: 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem — "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...> 2008/05/28

I used to catch Errno::EINVAL when using lots of open file descriptors
[#16982] Re: 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/05/29

On May 28, 2008, at 04:23 AM, Roger Pack wrote:
[#16985] Re: 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/05/29

On May 28, 2008, at 18:09 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#17005] Re: 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem — Hongli Lai <hongli@...99.net> 2008/05/29

Roger Pack wrote:
[#17053] Re: 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem — Christopher Thompson <cthompson@...> 2008/06/02

Hongli Lai wrote:
[#17054] Re: 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem — "Nick Sieger" <nicksieger@...> 2008/06/02

On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Christopher Thompson
[#16962] Re: 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/05/28

On May 27, 2008, at 14:16 PM, Christopher Thompson wrote:

[#16955] ruby-mode.el copyright assignment — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...>

6 messages 2008/05/27
[#17022] Re: ruby-mode.el copyright assignment — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/31

Hi,
[#17023] Re: ruby-mode.el copyright assignment — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...> 2008/05/31

Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> writes:
[#17024] Re: ruby-mode.el copyright assignment — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/31

Hi,
[#17205] Re: ruby-mode.el copyright assignment — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...> 2008/06/11

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
[#17514] Re: ruby-mode.el copyright assignment — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...> 2008/07/02

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#16976] IRHG -- New Release - Chapter 08 Finished! — Charles Thornton <ceo@...>

Core,

1 message 2008/05/28

[#16979] Array.nitems replacement? — David Flanagan <david@...>

Array.nitems has just been removed from 1.9, and as near as I can make

8 messages 2008/05/28
[#16993] Re: Array.nitems replacement? — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/05/29

At Thu, 29 May 2008 03:03:01 +0900,
[#16994] Re: Array.nitems replacement? — "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...> 2008/05/29

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
[#16995] Re: Array.nitems replacement? — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2008/05/29

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Akinori MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
[#16997] Re: Array.nitems replacement? — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2008/05/29

On Thursday 29 May 2008, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17003] Re: Array.nitems replacement? — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/29

Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17004] Re: Array.nitems replacement? — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/05/29

At Fri, 30 May 2008 02:35:56 +0900,
[#17006] Re: Array.nitems replacement? — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/05/29

I just changed Enumerable#count() to return the number of all elements

[#16980] Re: Array.nitems replacement? — David Flanagan <david@...>

I've attached a patch to alter Enumerable#count and Array#count so that

1 message 2008/05/28

[#16983] Bug in Method#to_proc on method with block — Mikael Hlund <mikael@...>

I seem to have found a bug in Ruby 1.9. Method#to_proc doesn't seem to =20=

2 messages 2008/05/29
[#16988] Re: Bug in Method#to_proc on method with block — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/29

Mikael Hlund wrote:

[#16984] ZLIB for MSVC 8 - tar_input.rb — "Giancarlo F Bellido" <support@...>

I managed to install wxruby and compile zlib extension using this patch in

5 messages 2008/05/29
[#16986] Re: [PATCH] ZLIB for MSVC 8 - tar_input.rb — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/05/29

On May 28, 2008, at 19:48 PM, Giancarlo F Bellido wrote:
[#16989] Re: [PATCH] ZLIB for MSVC 8 - tar_input.rb — "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...> 2008/05/29

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#17001] Re: [PATCH] ZLIB for MSVC 8 - tar_input.rb — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2008/05/29

On May 29, 2008, at 05:39 AM, Luis Lavena wrote:
[#17007] Re: [PATCH] ZLIB for MSVC 8 - tar_input.rb — "Giancarlo F Bellido" <support@...> 2008/05/29

> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Eric Hodel

[#17010] unexpected return using define_method — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>

Is this a bug?

8 messages 2008/05/30
[#17012] Re: unexpected return using define_method — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/30

Paul Brannan wrote:
[#17014] Re: unexpected return using define_method — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/30

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 06:10:25PM +0900, ts wrote:
[#17015] Re: unexpected return using define_method — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/30

Paul Brannan wrote:
[#17016] Re: unexpected return using define_method — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/05/30

At Fri, 30 May 2008 21:38:10 +0900,
[#17017] Re: unexpected return using define_method — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/30

Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17018] Re: unexpected return using define_method — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/05/30

At Fri, 30 May 2008 22:49:31 +0900,
[#17019] Re: unexpected return using define_method — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/30

Akinori MUSHA wrote:

[#17011] nd_file no longer used? — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>

In the ChangeLog, I see this comment:

1 message 2008/05/30

[#17026] error when building 1.8.7 from source with --enable-shared — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...>

V2hlbiBJIHRyeSB0byBidWlsZCBydWJ5IGZyb20gYnJhbmNoIHJ1YnlfMV84IHdpdGggLS1lbmFi

2 messages 2008/05/31
[#17027] Re: error when building 1.8.7 from source with --enable-shared — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/05/31

VGhlIHNhbWUgZm9yIHNvdXJjZSBmcm9tIHRydW5rLgoKL3Vzci9iaW4vbGQ6IHJlZ2NvbXAubzog

[#17028] Ruby 1.8.7 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Folks,

10 messages 2008/05/31
[#17038] Ruby 1.8.7 slower than 1.8.6? — Kornelius Kalnbach <murphy@...> 2008/06/02

Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17033] Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...> 2008/06/01

On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 12:25:08AM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17042] Re: Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/06/02

At Mon, 2 Jun 2008 06:37:21 +0900,
[#17043] Re: Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...> 2008/06/02

At Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:46:53 +0900,
[#17044] Re: Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...> 2008/06/02

On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 03:46:53PM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17046] Re: Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...> 2008/06/02

On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 04:07:21PM +0900, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
[#17396] Re: Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken — "Stephen Sykes" <sdsykes@...> 2008/06/24

I notice that ERB is still broken in Ruby 1.8.7.
[#17403] Re: Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/06/25

I was under the impression that comments were never allowed in ERB. For
[#17404] Re: Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken — "Stephen Sykes" <sdsykes@...> 2008/06/25

OK, fair enough, thanks.

[#17029] Re: [ruby-cvs:23967] Ruby:r16731: oops — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>

Please checkout the ruby_1_8_7 branch over again if you have one.

1 message 2008/05/31

[#17030] Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9 — Adam Strzelecki <ono@...>

Hello,

8 messages 2008/05/31
[#17119] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9 — Adam Strzelecki <ono@...> 2008/06/05

Hello again,
[#17120] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9 — ts <decoux@...> 2008/06/05

Adam Strzelecki wrote:
[#17121] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/06/05

Hi,
[#17122] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9 — Adam Strzelecki <ono@...> 2008/06/05

> to_ary() convert ISeq object to Array and well known objects such as
[#17123] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9 — Adam Strzelecki <ono@...> 2008/06/05

Just wanted to say thanks again, it works like a charm. I've reenabled
[#17124] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/06/05

Hi,
[#17125] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2008/06/05

Hi,

Ruby 1.8.7-preview3 has been released

From: "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Date: 2008-05-18 22:17:44 UTC
List: ruby-core #16788 
Folks,

Here is an announcement that the third preview of Ruby 1.8.7 has just
been released.  Changes from the previous preview release include
fixes for a couple of security problems, some incompatibility issues
and many bugs that have been addressed since the last preview, and a
few backports including Symbol#to_proc that was temporarily backed
out after preview1.

The new version of Ruby includes many bug fixes, lots of feature
enhancements and some performance improvements since 1.8.6 while
maintaining stability and backward compatibility with the previous
release to a high degree, although there are ongoing efforts that need
to be done toward adopting RubySpec.

The source code package is available in three formats at the following
locations:

	ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.8/ruby-1.8.7-preview3.tar.bz2
	ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.8/ruby-1.8.7-preview3.tar.gz
	ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/1.8/ruby-1.8.7-preview3.tar.zip

Checksums:

	MD5 (ruby-1.8.7-preview3.tar.bz2) = c3b09422860cf8defd972ade49c8a3d5
	SHA256 (ruby-1.8.7-preview3.tar.bz2) = a73649f8c595cae34dc74e0d6c8b74998cc708d26d7d7300b16254d876dc7fe0
	SIZE (ruby-1.8.7-preview3.tar.bz2) = 4055052

	MD5 (ruby-1.8.7-preview3.tar.gz) = a10233448872538f5dbb04a1104fe0c9
	SHA256 (ruby-1.8.7-preview3.tar.gz) = dfe15287d379956761e5059be624d00fe3626674be197ead63526d9bb78fdab4
	SIZE (ruby-1.8.7-preview3.tar.gz) = 4747478

	MD5 (ruby-1.8.7-preview3.zip) = 21ca74601ce1a7250a2f22712e392b7e
	SHA256 (ruby-1.8.7-preview3.zip) = 1659a25e30119e207580b5f05540bf58244e8cef64de8c6a18e1813b1efbfa3f
	SIZE (ruby-1.8.7-preview3.zip) = 5833388

For a brief list of user visible changes and a full list of all
changes, see the bundled files named NEWS and ChangeLog, which are
also available at the following locations:

	http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/tags/v1_8_7_preview3/NEWS
	http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/tags/v1_8_7_preview3/ChangeLog

Please test it out and drop us a report in the following tracker if
you find any problem:

	http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?atid=22040&group_id=426&func=browse

Some known problems are on the list and when you find one it may be
fixed already, so please look through all items querying with "State"
set to "Any" before submitting a new one.

The next and probably the last preview is planned on next Monday, and
the final release will be released by the end of this month.

This may be your last chance to report problems!  Please help us debug
this preview using your libraries and applications and make the final
release production ready.

Regards,

--
Akinori MUSHA / http://akinori.org/

In This Thread

Prev Next