From: ts <decoux@...>
Date: 2008-05-06T02:07:26+09:00
Subject: Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on

David A. Black wrote:
>    define_method(:m) &lambda(x,y,z) { block }

 too complex for me :-)

> 
> I thought that was one of the purposes of ->(){} -- to let you use
> method argument semantics in Proc objects. Am I wrong about that?

 no, probably.

 This is just me which associate, probably wrongly, lambda and
 define_method and 1.9 seems have method argument semantics with
 lambda 


Guy Decoux