[#16611] lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

This is one of those e-mails that I know from the start to be futile, =20=

148 messages 2008/05/01
[#16661] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2008/05/05

On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 12:26:47PM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#16662] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/05

Hi --

[#16663] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — ts <decoux@...> 2008/05/05

David A. Black wrote:

[#16664] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/05

Hi --

[#16682] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — ara howard <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/08

[#16684] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Michael Neumann <mneumann@...> 2008/05/08

ara howard wrote:

[#16687] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/08

Hi --

[#16691] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/08

[#16692] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/08

Hi --

[#16695] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...> 2008/05/08

[#16705] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/05/11

Not to throw the whole thread into a tizzy again, but why again is:

[#16708] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/11

Hi,

[#16720] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/11

Hi,

[#16721] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/12

Hi --

[#16722] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/12

Hi,

[#16723] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/05/12

[#16724] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/12

Hi,

[#16726] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...> 2008/05/12

What about "fn" or "fun", for "function"?

[#16728] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/12

Hi,

[#16731] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Evan Phoenix <evan@...> 2008/05/12

[#16732] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/12

Hi,

[#16759] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/13

Hi --

[#16766] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/14

Hi,

[#16784] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "David A. Black" <dblack@...> 2008/05/18

Hi --

[#16795] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Nate_Wiger@... 2008/05/19

On Wed, 14 May 2008, David A. Black wrote:

[#16797] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/19

Hi,

[#16798] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Christopher Gill" <gilltots@...> 2008/05/19

how about an uppercase lambda (instead of the usual lowercase one)

[#16802] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/20

Christopher Gill wrote:

[#16843] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/22

Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:

[#16846] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2008/05/22

=20

[#16854] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...> 2008/05/22

T24gVGh1LCBNYXkgMjIsIDIwMDggYXQgNTozNyBQTSwgQmVyZ2VyLCBEYW5pZWwgPERhbmllbC5C

[#16857] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...> 2008/05/23

RXZlbiB0aG91Z2ggSSBzZWUgdGhlIHVzZWZ1bG5lc3MsIHRoYXQncyBqdXN0IHVnbHkuCgotLUpl

[#16874] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Nate_Wiger@... 2008/05/23

"Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@gmail.com> wrote on 05/22/2008 05:35:01=20

[#16875] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2008/05/23

2008/5/23 <Nate_Wiger@playstation.sony.com>:

[#16886] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>

This patch is an independent but related one to my previous one. It can be

64 messages 2008/05/25
[#16895] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,

[#16900] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...> 2008/05/26

On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>

[#16901] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,

[#16902] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,

[#16903] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,

[#16904] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/26

[#16905] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,

[#16907] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/26

[#16912] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2008/05/26

Hi,

[#16920] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/26

If I may, here are two entries from the ChangeLog file:

[#16922] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/26

[#16927] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/26

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#16928] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/26

[#16929] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/26

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#16931] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — Dave Thomas <dave@...> 2008/05/27

[#16946] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/27

Dave Thomas wrote:

[#16947] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — James Gray <james@...> 2008/05/27

On May 27, 2008, at 12:33 PM, David Flanagan wrote:

[#16949] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax — David Flanagan <david@...> 2008/05/27

James Gray wrote:

Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax

From: "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...>
Date: 2008-05-29 16:15:07 UTC
List: ruby-core #16999
R3V5cywgSSBkbyB1bmRlcnN0YW5kIHdoeSB5b3UgZG9uJ3QgbGlrZSAtPiBhbmQgbWF5YmUgaXQg
aXMgbm90Cm5lY2Vzc2FyeSB3aXRoIEVyaWMgTWFodXJpbiBwYXRjaCAoSSd2ZSB0cmllZCBpdCBh
bHJlYWR5IGFuZCBsb3ZlIGl0LAppdCB3b3JrcyBhcyBJIGV4cGVjdGVkIHdoZW4gd2FzIGxlYXJu
aW5nIHJ1YnkgLSBtZXRvZCBkbyB8YSwgYj0xMCwKKnJlc3QsICZibG9ja3wgZW5kIGV0YykuIEJ1
dCB3aHkgZG8geW91IHB1c2ggTWF0eiB0byB1c2UgYmxvY2sgPSB7fHwKLi4uIH0gc3ludGF4ID8g
SXQgaXMgdG8gaGFyZCB0byB1c2UgbGFtYmRhL3Byb2MvUHJvYy5uZXc/IEVzcGVjaWFsbHkKd2hl
biB7fSBjb3VsZCBiZSBtaXN0YWtlbiB3aXRoIGhhc2guIFdoZW4gSSBsZWFybmVkIFJ1YnkgSSB3
YXMgc28KaGFwcHkgdGhhdCAgKG9uIHRoZSBjb250cmFyeSB0byBQZXJsKSBJIGRvbid0IGhhdmUg
dG8gcGFyc2UgY29kZSBpbiBteQptaW5kIHNvIG11Y2guIEkgY2FuIGp1c3QgcmVhZCBjb2RlLiBB
bmQgYWRkaW5nIHRoaW5ncyBsaWtlIGJsb2NrID0ge30Kd2hpY2ggY291bGQgYmUgdmVyeSBlYXNs
eSBtaXN0YWtlbiB3aXRoIGhhc2ggaXMgcmV0dXJuaW5nIHRvIHNvIHVnbHkKUGVybCB0aGluZ3Mu
CgpJIGFzayBhZ2Fpbi4KV2hhdCdzIHdyb25nIHdpdGgKCmZuID0gbGFtYmRhIHt8cHwgcHV0cyBw
fQo/CgpBbmQgd2h5IGJlbG93IHZlcnNpb24gc2hvdWxkIGJlIGNvbnNpZGVyZWQgYmV0dGVyPwpm
biA9IHt8cHwgcHV0cyBwfQoKQUZBSVIgUGVybCA1LjEwIChJIGRvbid0IHVzZSBQZXJsIGJ1dCBy
ZWFkIHNvbWV3aGVyZSkgaW50cm9kdWNlZCB0d28KbmV3IG9wZXJhdG9yczogLy8gYW5kIC8vPS4g
SSBkb24ndCBrbm93IGV4YWN0bHkgd2hhdCBpdCBkb2VzIGJ1dCBJIGNhbgpvbmx5IHNheSB0aGF0
IGl0IHN1Y2tzLiBBZnRlciBhbGwgaXQgY291bGQgYmUgZWFzaWx5IG1pc3Rha2VuIHdpdGggfHwK
YW5kIHx8PS4gUGxlYXNlLCBkb24ndCB0cnkgbWFrZSBSdWJ5IHNvIHBlcmxpc2guCgpFcmljLCBw
YXRjaCBmb3IgZG9pbmcgcGFyYW1ldGVycyBmb3IgYmxvY2tzL2xhbWJhZHMgYXMgbWV0aG9kcyB3
b3JrcyBncmVhdC4KCi0tIApSYWRvc7NhdyBCdbNhdAoKaHR0cDovL3JhZGFyZWsuam9nZ2VyLnBs
IC0gbfNqIGJsb2cK

In This Thread