[#16611] lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
This is one of those e-mails that I know from the start to be futile,
148 messages
2008/05/01
[#16613] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...>
2008/05/01
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
[#16620] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/01
Hi --
[#16631] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2008/05/02
David A. Black wrote:
[#16649] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...>
2008/05/04
wouldn't
[#16661] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2008/05/05
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 12:26:47PM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16662] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/05
Hi --
[#16663] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— ts <decoux@...>
2008/05/05
David A. Black wrote:
[#16664] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/05
Hi --
[#16665] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— ts <decoux@...>
2008/05/05
David A. Black wrote:
[#16666] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2008/05/05
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:02:34AM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
[#16668] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/05
Hi --
[#16682] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— ara howard <ara.t.howard@...>
2008/05/08
[#16684] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
2008/05/08
ara howard wrote:
[#16687] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/08
Hi --
[#16691] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...>
2008/05/08
[#16692] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/08
Hi --
[#16695] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...>
2008/05/08
[#16696] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/08
Hi --
[#16705] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
2008/05/11
Not to throw the whole thread into a tizzy again, but why again is:
[#16707] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
2008/05/11
Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#16742] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2008/05/12
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 07:24:07PM +0900, Michael Neumann wrote:
[#16708] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/05/11
Hi,
[#16709] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/11
Hi --
[#16710] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
2008/05/11
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
[#16720] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/11
Hi,
[#16721] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/12
Hi --
[#16722] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/12
Hi,
[#16723] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
2008/05/12
[#16724] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/12
Hi,
[#16726] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...>
2008/05/12
What about "fn" or "fun", for "function"?
[#16728] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/12
Hi,
[#16731] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
2008/05/12
[#16732] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/12
Hi,
[#16733] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
2008/05/12
[#16759] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/13
Hi --
[#16766] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/14
Hi,
[#16784] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/18
Hi --
[#16795] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Nate_Wiger@...
2008/05/19
On Wed, 14 May 2008, David A. Black wrote:
[#16797] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/19
Hi,
[#16798] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Christopher Gill" <gilltots@...>
2008/05/19
how about an uppercase lambda (instead of the usual lowercase one)
[#16802] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...>
2008/05/20
Christopher Gill wrote:
[#16843] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...>
2008/05/22
Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
[#16846] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
2008/05/22
[#16854] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...>
2008/05/22
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
[#16857] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...>
2008/05/23
Even though I see the usefulness, that's just ugly.
[#16874] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Nate_Wiger@...
2008/05/23
"Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@gmail.com> wrote on 05/22/2008 05:35:01
[#16875] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...>
2008/05/23
2008/5/23 <Nate_Wiger@playstation.sony.com>:
[#16879] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Tammo Tjarks <tammo@...>
2008/05/24
I am not sure if that fits to the thread. I have not used yet the more
[#16881] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Phlip <phlip2005@...>
2008/05/24
Tammo Tjarks wrote:
[#16883] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/24
Hi --
[#16885] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Phlip <phlip2005@...>
2008/05/25
> assert_yin_yang -> { q += 0 }, 'it broke!', -> { q == 42 }
[#16887] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/25
Hi --
[#16888] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Phlip <phlip2005@...>
2008/05/25
>> assert_yin_yang proc{ q += 0 }, 'it broke!',
[#16844] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/05/22
Hi,
[#16859] Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity (Was: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on)
— "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...>
2008/05/23
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#16862] Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity (Was: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on)
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/05/23
Hi,
[#16627] Monotonic timeofday() — zimbatm <zimbatm@...>
Hi ruby-core.
4 messages
2008/05/01
[#16642] ruby/trunk rev 16276 broken? ib/erb.rb:429:in `initialize': wrong argument type StringScanner (expected true) (TypeError) — Kurt Stephens <ks@...>
Build crashes shortly after miniruby linkage
4 messages
2008/05/02
[#16648] Uniform RDoc markup — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...>
Would there be any resistance to making the markup of the RDoc
9 messages
2008/05/04
[#16760] errors running make test — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...>
I updated to revision 16403 and now compiling and running ruby1.9
4 messages
2008/05/13
[#16772] The RubySpec project at rubyspec.org — Brian Ford <brixen@...>
Hi all,
1 message
2008/05/14
[#16773] Singleton methods on Float and Bignum — Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
In 1.8 (and 1.9 likely), trying to add a singleton method to a Float
8 messages
2008/05/15
[#16775] Re: Singleton methods on Float and Bignum
— Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>
2008/05/15
Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#16788] Ruby 1.8.7-preview3 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Folks,
3 messages
2008/05/18
[#16791] GC heap allocation in 1.9 — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>
While getting the latest of trunk, I stumbled on r16194.
5 messages
2008/05/19
[#16806] nil.instance_eval — ts <decoux@...>
4 messages
2008/05/20
[#16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — Masoom <masoom.shaikh@...>
Hi,
10 messages
2008/05/20
[#16809] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2008/05/20
Hi,
[#16816] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault
— Masoom <masoom.shaikh@...>
2008/05/20
that means current vm is not embeddable ? by min. src I guess you mean the
[#16817] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault
— ts <decoux@...>
2008/05/20
Masoom wrote:
[#16812] Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
8 messages
2008/05/20
[#16820] Re: Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number
— "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>
2008/05/20
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:20 AM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#16822] Re: Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number
— Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>
2008/05/20
Luis Lavena wrote:
[#16832] Who is responsible for Ruby license? — "Han, Kimyung" <Kimyung.Han@...>
I am trying to discuss the ruby license with anyone who is responsible
6 messages
2008/05/21
[#16833] Re: [URGENT] Who is responsible for Ruby license?
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/21
Hi,
[#16834] Returning duplicate values from Dir.glob — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>
Hi,
7 messages
2008/05/21
[#16839] ruby autoconf problems — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...>
Hello
6 messages
2008/05/22
[#16845] Re: ruby autoconf problems
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/05/22
Hi,
[#16864] removal of magical definition of name for some class definition idioms — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>
Dear list
5 messages
2008/05/23
[#16884] block args w/ defaults (was Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Eric Mahurin <eric.mahurin@gmail.com>
4 messages
2008/05/24
[#16925] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (was Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity)
— "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...>
2008/05/26
Hey!
[#16886] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
This patch is an independent but related one to my previous one. It can be
64 messages
2008/05/25
[#16960] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
2008/05/28
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Eric Mahurin <eric.mahurin@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16895] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/05/26
Hi,
[#16900] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
2008/05/26
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
[#16901] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/26
Hi,
[#16902] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...>
2008/05/26
Hi,
[#16903] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/26
Hi,
[#16904] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2008/05/26
[#16905] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/26
Hi,
[#16907] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2008/05/26
[#16912] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/26
Hi,
[#16920] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2008/05/26
If I may, here are two entries from the ChangeLog file:
[#16922] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2008/05/26
[#16927] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2008/05/26
Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16928] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2008/05/26
[#16929] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2008/05/26
Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16931] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2008/05/27
[#16946] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2008/05/27
Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16947] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— James Gray <james@...>
2008/05/27
On May 27, 2008, at 12:33 PM, David Flanagan wrote:
[#16949] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2008/05/27
James Gray wrote:
[#16954] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2008/05/27
[#16956] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2008/05/27
Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16961] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...>
2008/05/28
David Flanagan wrote:
[#16967] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/28
Hi,
[#16971] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
2008/05/28
On 5/28/08, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#16990] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/29
Hi,
[#16908] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...>
2008/05/26
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
[#16910] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/26
Hi,
[#16911] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...>
2008/05/26
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>
[#16921] Major performance degradation on trunk — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2008/05/26
[#16943] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (updated) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
2008/5/26 Rados梶w Buウat <radek.bulat@gmail.com>:
5 messages
2008/05/27
[#16945] Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Looking at the source, I'd expect the following to work:
9 messages
2008/05/27
[#16951] Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered" — "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...>
Hi,
8 messages
2008/05/27
[#17133] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered"
— "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...>
2008/06/06
2008/5/27, Paul Boekholt <p.boekholt@gmail.com>:
[#17199] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered"
— "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...>
2008/06/10
2008/6/6, Paul Boekholt <p.boekholt@gmail.com>:
[#17227] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered"
— "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...>
2008/06/11
> 2008/6/6, Paul Boekholt <p.boekholt@gmail.com>:
[#16953] 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem — Christopher Thompson <cthompson@...>
Warning: This message is probably only peripherally related to Ruby!
8 messages
2008/05/27
[#16970] Re: 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem
— "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...>
2008/05/28
I used to catch Errno::EINVAL when using lots of open file descriptors
[#16955] ruby-mode.el copyright assignment — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...>
6 messages
2008/05/27
[#17022] Re: ruby-mode.el copyright assignment
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/05/31
Hi,
[#16979] Array.nitems replacement? — David Flanagan <david@...>
Array.nitems has just been removed from 1.9, and as near as I can make
8 messages
2008/05/28
[#16984] ZLIB for MSVC 8 - tar_input.rb — "Giancarlo F Bellido" <support@...>
I managed to install wxruby and compile zlib extension using this patch in
5 messages
2008/05/29
[#16986] Re: [PATCH] ZLIB for MSVC 8 - tar_input.rb
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2008/05/29
On May 28, 2008, at 19:48 PM, Giancarlo F Bellido wrote:
[#17010] unexpected return using define_method — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
Is this a bug?
8 messages
2008/05/30
[#17012] Re: unexpected return using define_method
— ts <decoux@...>
2008/05/30
Paul Brannan wrote:
[#17014] Re: unexpected return using define_method
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2008/05/30
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 06:10:25PM +0900, ts wrote:
[#17015] Re: unexpected return using define_method
— ts <decoux@...>
2008/05/30
Paul Brannan wrote:
[#17028] Ruby 1.8.7 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Folks,
10 messages
2008/05/31
[#17033] Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken
— "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...>
2008/06/01
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 12:25:08AM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17042] Re: Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken
— "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
2008/06/02
At Mon, 2 Jun 2008 06:37:21 +0900,
[#17044] Re: Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken
— "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...>
2008/06/02
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 03:46:53PM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17030] Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9 — Adam Strzelecki <ono@...>
Hello,
8 messages
2008/05/31
[#17119] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9
— Adam Strzelecki <ono@...>
2008/06/05
Hello again,
[#17121] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2008/06/05
Hi,
[#17122] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9
— Adam Strzelecki <ono@...>
2008/06/05
> to_ary() convert ISeq object to Array and well known objects such as
Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault
From:
Masoom <masoom.shaikh@...>
Date:
2008-05-20 10:12:43 UTC
List:
ruby-core #16807
Hi,
I am trying to embed the interpreter inside my executable but it crashes
@ vm.c line # 69 ----------- if (iseq->type != ISEQ_TYPE_TOP) {
any thoughts ?
also I failed to build the latest src, Revision: 16492 with following crash
log
this is XP Prof SP2 box
D:/code_downloads/ruby/ruby1.9/lib/mkmf.rb:81: [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.9.0 (2008-05-20 revision 16416) [i386-mswin32_80]
-- stack frame ------------
0000 (00B30020): 00000004
0001 (00B30024): 00000001
0002 (00B30028): 00000004
0003 (00B3002C): 00000001
0004 (00B30030): 00c49910
0005 (00B30034): 00000004
0006 (00B30038): 00c799d0
0007 (00B3003C): 00ef9340
0008 (00B30040): 00ef92a0
0009 (00B30044): 00ef9264
0010 (00B30048): 00000004
0011 (00B3004C): 00000004
0012 (00B30050): 00ef87c4
0013 (00B30054): 00ef8788
0014 (00B30058): 00000004
0015 (00B3005C): 00000004
0016 (00B30060): 00000004
0017 (00B30064): 00000004
0018 (00B30068): 00000004
0019 (00B3006C): 00000004
0020 (00B30070): 00000004
0021 (00B30074): 00000004
0022 (00B30078): 00000004
0023 (00B3007C): 00000004
0024 (00B30080): 00000004
0025 (00B30084): 00000004
0026 (00B30088): 00000004
0027 (00B3008C): 00000004
0028 (00B30090): 00000004
0029 (00B30094): 00000004
0030 (00B30098): 00000004
0031 (00B3009C): 00000004
0032 (00B300A0): 00000004
0033 (00B300A4): 00ef923c
0034 (00B300A8): 00ef85a8
0035 (00B300AC): 00f1f978
0036 (00B300B0): 00000004
0037 (00B300B4): 00baff8d
0038 (00B300B8): 00ef806c
0039 (00B300BC): 00000004
0040 (00B300C0): 00f040a9
0041 (00B300C4): 00000004
0042 (00B300C8): 00ef806c
0043 (00B300CC): 00f1f0f4
0044 (00B300D0): 00f1f16c
0045 (00B300D4): 00f1f220
0046 (00B300D8): 00f1f144
0047 (00B300DC): 00f1f0b8
0048 (00B300E0): 00f1eec4
0049 (00B300E4): 00000002
0050 (00B300E8): 00c7b898
0051 (00B300EC): 00c79c78
0052 (00B300F0): 00f1ee60
0053 (00B300F4): 00f1edac
0054 (00B300F8): 00f2ab48
0055 (00B300FC): 00bc6948
0056 (00B30100): 00ee5fac
0057 (00B30104): 00000004
0058 (00B30108): 00000001
0059 (00B3010C): 00ee5fac
0060 (00B30110): 00000004
0061 (00B30114): 00f2a74c
0062 (00B30118): 00000004
0063 (00B3011C): 00efa3f8
0064 (00B30120): 00f2a724
0065 (00B30124): 00f2a6e8
0066 (00B30128): 00000004
0067 (00B3012C): 00000001
0068 (00B30130): 00f2a6d4
0069 (00B30134): 00bd4da4
0070 (00B30138): 00f2a6e8
0071 (00B3013C): 00f2a724
0072 (00B30140): 00000004
0073 (00B30144): 00000001 <- lfp <- dfp
-- control frame ----------
c:0009 p:---- s:0074 b:0074 l:000073 d:000073 CFUNC :expand_path
c:0008 p:0051 s:0069 b:0068 l:000067 d:000067 METHOD
D:/code_downloads/ruby/ruby
1.9/lib/mkmf.rb:81
c:0007 p:0861 s:0062 b:0059 l:000058 d:000058 METHOD ./ext/extmk.rb:184
c:0006 p:0010 s:0041 b:0041 l:001448 d:000040 BLOCK ./ext/extmk.rb:436
c:0005 p:---- s:0040 b:0040 l:000039 d:000039 FINISH :join
c:0004 p:---- s:0038 b:0038 l:000037 d:000037 CFUNC :each
c:0003 p:1006 s:0035 b:0035 l:001448 d:001448 TOP ./ext/extmk.rb:435
c:0002 p:---- s:0004 b:0004 l:000003 d:000003 FINISH :private_class_method
c:0001 p:0000 s:0002 b:0002 l:000001 d:000001 TOP <dummy toplevel>:480
---------------------------
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '.\miniruby.exe' : return code '0xc0000005'
Stop.
Masoom Shaikh